Working shy (National Socialism)

Arbeitsscheu (German: "work-shy" or "averse to work") was a specific stigmatizing label used in Nazi Germany for people whom the regime accused of refusing work, evading labour discipline, or failing to meet National Socialist expectations of productive conduct. Unlike asocial (Asoziale), which functioned as a broad umbrella category for people deemed socially deviant or "community alien", arbeitsscheu referred more narrowly to an alleged defect in willingness to work. In Nazi practice, however, the distinction was not stable: people described as arbeitsscheu were usually persecuted administratively and police-wise as part of the broader category of those branded asocial.[1][2]

The term drew on older traditions of poor relief, workhouses and coercive labour, but under National Socialism it acquired a specifically ideological and police function. It served to identify persons who were said not merely to be unemployed, but to resist the labour and behavioural norms of the Volksgemeinschaft ("people's community").[3]

The best-known measure associated with the term was the 1938 mass arrest campaign later known as Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich, during which more than 10,000 people were deported to concentration camps.[4][5]

Terminology

In Nazi usage, arbeitsscheu and asocial were related but not identical terms.

Asocial (asozial) was the broader and more diffuse category. It was applied to people whom the regime considered unwilling or unable to fit into the social, moral and disciplinary order of the Volksgemeinschaft. The term could encompass beggars, homeless people, people accused of prostitution or pimping, alcoholics, welfare recipients, persons with repeated minor convictions, and many others whom police and welfare authorities regarded as deviant.[6][7]

Arbeitsscheu, by contrast, referred more specifically to an alleged refusal to work or to submit to labour discipline. The term implied that the person concerned was not simply poor, unemployed, or marginal, but supposedly unwilling to perform regular work or to accept the regime's demand for disciplined productivity.[8]

In practice, the narrower charge of being arbeitsscheu was often used as one way of classifying someone as asocial. In other words, not every person branded asocial was accused of being arbeitsscheu, but people stigmatized as arbeitsscheu were commonly processed by police and camp authorities within the wider persecution of so-called asocials.[9]

For that reason, historians generally distinguish analytically between the two terms even though Nazi administrative and police practice frequently blurred them.[10]

Historical background

The accusation of being "work-shy" predated National Socialism. In German-speaking Europe, poor people had long been divided into supposedly "worthy" and "unworthy" poor, and institutions such as workhouses and houses of correction were used to enforce labour discipline. Recent scholarship has emphasized the long continuity of coercive measures directed at poverty, vagrancy and alleged idleness from the early modern period into the 20th century.[11]

Under National Socialism, these older traditions were radicalized and fused with racial, eugenic and police concepts. The regime did not treat alleged work-shyness merely as a labour-market or welfare issue; it treated it as evidence of a defective attitude toward work and social discipline, and therefore as a sign of exclusion from the national community.[12]

Meaning in Nazi ideology

In the ideological language of the Nazi state, labour was not understood only in economic terms. It was presented as a moral obligation to the Volksgemeinschaft. A person labelled arbeitsscheu was therefore constructed as someone who rejected not merely employment, but the discipline, obedience and usefulness expected by the regime.[13]

This distinguished the term from the broader notion of asociality. Whereas asocial marked an allegedly general incompatibility with the social order, arbeitsscheu focused on the specific accusation that a person failed to fulfil the National Socialist demand for labour discipline. The charge could be levelled against people who were poor or homeless, but also against persons who were considered insufficiently compliant in the workplace or resistant to compulsory labour expectations.[14]

At the same time, Nazi authorities did not use the term consistently. The accusation often merged with wider categories of social deviance, so that an alleged failure to work could be treated as one indicator of asocial behaviour rather than as a strictly separate classification.[15]

Police practice and persecution

From the early years of the dictatorship, Nazi authorities persecuted people described as "work-shy" through welfare measures, compulsory labour, police surveillance, preventive detention and concentration camp imprisonment. The accusation enabled the regime to redefine social marginality as wilful refusal and to convert poverty or nonconformity into a police matter.[16]

The accusation became especially important in 1938. In April and June of that year, the criminal police carried out a Reich-wide campaign of mass arrests, retrospectively known as Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich. According to the Deutsches Historisches Museum, more than 10,000 people classified as "asocial" were arrested between 13 and 18 June 1938 alone and deported to concentration camps.[17]

The title of the action itself shows the semantic overlap: the campaign was named after Arbeitsscheu, yet those arrested were in large part police-defined as asocials. This reflects the fact that arbeitsscheu operated as a more specific accusation inside a wider regime of persecution directed at persons labelled socially deviant.[18]

The campaign was directed at a heterogeneous group. Sachsenhausen Memorial lists among those affected people convicted of "begging" and vagrancy, homeless people, alcoholics, alleged pimps, men accused of refusing maintenance payments, and others whose lifestyle did not conform to National Socialist norms. The same source notes that striking workers, Jewish men, and Sinti and Roma were also among those arrested.[19][20]

Concentration camps

People deported under the accusation of work-shyness were generally not treated in the camps as a wholly separate prisoner group. Instead, they were usually subsumed within the broader prisoner category of those branded asocial. This administrative practice is one reason why the distinction between the terms can disappear in camp records even when it remains analytically important.[21]

In Sachsenhausen, around 6,000 people arrested in the June 1938 action were sent to the camp.[22][23] According to Buchenwald Memorial, more than 4,000 men were committed to Buchenwald in the April and June actions, where the SS registered them as ASR-Häftlinge ("Arbeitsscheu Reich" prisoners). Under cover of the same arrests, hundreds of Sinti and Roma and more than a thousand Jews were also deported to Buchenwald.[24]

Prisoners stigmatized in this field of persecution were generally marked with the black triangle associated with the camp category of the so-called asocials.[25] Many died from hunger, disease, forced labour, or SS violence.

Post-war memory and recognition

After 1945, people persecuted under the labels asocial and arbeitsscheu remained marginalized in public memory and in compensation practice. The post-war persistence of the stigma meant that the narrower accusation of work-shyness was often not critically distinguished from the broader Nazi label of asociality, and both groups remained under-recognized for decades.[26]

Sachsenhausen Memorial notes that this victim group remained marginalized in remembrance culture for decades and that only a small number of survivors spoke publicly about their experiences.[27]

On 13 February 2020, the German Bundestag adopted a motion recognizing people persecuted by the Nazis as so-called "asocials" and "professional criminals" as victims of National Socialism.[28] In current historical scholarship and memorial work, arbeitsscheu is treated not as a descriptive social category but as a specific Nazi accusation within the broader persecution complex commonly summarized under the label of the so-called asocials.[29]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  2. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  3. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  4. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  5. ^ "Massenverhaftungen". Gedenkstätte Buchenwald (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  6. ^ "34/2018 Die Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen erinnert mit einer Führung über „asoziale" Häftlinge im KZ Sachsenhausen an den 80. Jahrestag der „Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich"". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  7. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  8. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  9. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  10. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  11. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  12. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  13. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  14. ^ "34/2018 Die Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen erinnert mit einer Führung über „asoziale" Häftlinge im KZ Sachsenhausen an den 80. Jahrestag der „Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich"". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  15. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  16. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  17. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  18. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  19. ^ "34/2018 Die Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen erinnert mit einer Führung über „asoziale" Häftlinge im KZ Sachsenhausen an den 80. Jahrestag der „Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich"". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  20. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  21. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  22. ^ "Aktion "Arbeitsscheu Reich" 1938". LeMO (in German). Deutsches Historisches Museum. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  23. ^ "34/2018 Die Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen erinnert mit einer Führung über „asoziale" Häftlinge im KZ Sachsenhausen an den 80. Jahrestag der „Aktion Arbeitsscheu Reich"". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  24. ^ "Massenverhaftungen". Gedenkstätte Buchenwald (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  25. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  26. ^ Kutschke, Beate (2023). "The State's Dealing with the Poor before, during, and after National Socialism: Continuities and Discontinuities. Part 1". S:I.M.O.N. – Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 10 (3): 104–120. doi:10.23777/sn.0323/ess_bkut01. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  27. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  28. ^ "„Asoziale" und „Berufsverbrecher" sollen als NS-Opfer anerkannt werden". Deutscher Bundestag (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  29. ^ "27/2023: 85. Jahrestag der „Aktion arbeitsscheu Reich" – In der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen wird ein Gedenkzeichen für die Häftlinge mit dem schwarzen Winkel eingeweiht". Gedenkstätte und Museum Sachsenhausen (in German). Retrieved 14 March 2026.

Further reading

  • Ayaß, Wolfgang (1995). "Asoziale" im Nationalsozialismus (in German). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
  • Hörath, Julia (2017). "Asoziale" und "Berufsverbrecher" in den Konzentrationslagern 1933 bis 1938 (in German). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Ayaß, Wolfgang (1998). "Gemeinschaftsfremde". Quellen zur Verfolgung von "Asozialen" 1933–1945 (in German). Koblenz: Bundesarchiv.