William Winthrop

William Winthrop
Acting Judge Advocate General of the United States Army
In office
January 22, 1881 โ€“ February 18, 1881
PresidentRutherford B. Hayes
Preceded byWilliam McKee Dunn
Succeeded byDavid Gaskill Swaim
Personal details
Born(1831-08-03)August 3, 1831
DiedApril 8, 1899(1899-04-08) (aged 67)
SpouseAlice Worthington Winthrop
ParentElizabeth Dwight (Woolsey) Winthrop
RelativesJohn Winthrop (ancestor)
Robert Charles Winthrop (uncle)
Theodore Dwight Woolsey (uncle)
Theodore Winthrop (brother)
EducationYale University (A.B.)
Yale Law School (LL.B.)
Military service
AllegianceUnited States of America
Union
Branch/serviceUnited States Army
Union Army
Years of service1861โ€“1895
Rank Colonel
Unit7th New York Militia
1st United States Sharpshooters
CommandsJudge Advocate General of the Army
Battles/warsAmerican Civil War

William Woolsey Winthrop (1831โ€“1899) was acting Judge Advocate General of the United States Army from January 22, 1881, to February 18, 1881.[1] A legal scholar, he was the author of a number of works on military law, including the influential Military Law and Precedents. The United States Supreme Court has described him as "the Blackstone of military law."[2]. According to his biographer, Winthrop descended from John Winthrop and was related to Theodore Dwight Woolsey as well as Speaker of the House Robert Charles Winthrop.

Winthrop graduated from Yale University and Yale Law School then spent another year studying at Harvard Law School. After law school he travelled to the Minnesota Territory where he set up a law practice but became involved in drafting the first constitution for its statehood[3]. Winthrop was staunchly anti-slavery and he placed into the constitution the right to universal make suffrage.[4]

When the Civil War broke out, he and his brother Theodore Winthrop, joined the New York Seventh Regiment, and after ninety days of service, he was commissioned as a lieutenant in the First United States Sharpshooters.[5] After being shot in the lung during the American Civil War, he spent the rest of his career as a judge advocate general until 1895.[6]

The robustness of Winthrop's scholarship has been challenged, as has the reliance on his work by judges to make ahistorical claims bolstering their decisions.[6][7] In particular, Winthrop's scholarship aggressively argued for the expansion of executive power over the military, presenting his ideas as the law without citation, and his ideas were then picked up by jurists who believed themselves to be following precedent.[6] For example, after Winthrop cited the United States Supreme Court case Dynes v. Hoover near his assertion that the court martial system was an "instrumentality" that the president could use liberally to discipline military personnel, judges began to summarily cite that case for that proposition despite the fact that it had nothing to do with that. Over time, this position even came to be called the "traditional view."[7]

Footnotes

  1. ^ "William Winthrop", Military Law Review, 1965, retrieved April 26, 2023
  2. ^ Ortiz v. United States (PDF), 2018
  3. ^ Joshua E. Kastenberg, The Blackstone of Military Law: Colonel William Winthrop (Scarecrow Press 2009)
  4. ^ Id
  5. ^ Id
  6. ^ a b c Joshua E. Kastenberg, Reassessing the Ahistorical Judicial Use of William Winthrop and Frederick Bernays Wiener, Journal of National Security Law & Policy (2021). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/904
  7. ^ a b Richard L. Tedrow, Get Rid of this Fallacy, 32 JUDGE ADVOC. J. 48 (1962).

Sources