Sustainable innovation

Environmental innovation, eco-innovation or sustainable innovation refers to innovation focused on the systematic development of new products, services, processes, or business models that significantly reduce environmental harm while creating economic and social value.[1][2] Beyond technological and environmental dimensions, sustainable innovation extends to incorporate behavioral, cultural, and systemic transformations that foster long-term ecological balance, social equity, and economic viability.[3] It plays a crucial role in addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion while aligning economic growth with environmental protection and social well-being.[4] Environmental sustainable innovation integrates environmental considerations into all stages of innovation, aligning with circular economy principles, green technologies, and clean production practices.[1][5] It encourages organisations to transition from linear production models to restorative and regenerative systems.[6]

Definition and Scope

Sustainable innovation prioritizes long-term ecological balance, social equity, and economic viability by integrating technological advancements with behavioral, cultural, and systemic transformations.[3][7][8] According to Andrew Hargadon, sustainable innovation involves the development of financially viable products that support healthy environments and communities, distinguishing it from conventional innovation strategies that often disregard these criteria.[8]

A key distinguishing feature is its focus on the behavioral dimension of sustainability, acknowledging that people's behaviors are influenced by social, economic, and environmental conditions, and these behaviors significantly impact the economy, environment, and society.[9] This dimension emphasizes the need for interventions that promote positive and lasting behavioral changes, aligning closely with behavioral design principles and behavioral economics.[10]

The concept has gained significant attention in scholarly literature, with researchers highlighting its systemic, impact-oriented, and inclusive nature, particularly through the work of Michele Visciòla and others who emphasize thinking as behavioral scientists while acting as designers.[3][11][12]

Key characteristics

These innovation encompasses a broad range of technological and non-technological characteristics. These characteristics highlight how businesses, industries, and institutions adopt different mechanisms, ranging from incremental improvements to systemic transformations, to advance sustainability objectives.[13]

Technological

Technological eco-innovations focus on modifying, redesigning, and creating processes and products to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining or improving economic performance.[14] They typically involve cleaner production methods, resource efficiency measures, life-cycle thinking, and the development of closed-loop manufacturing systems.[13]

  • Resource Efficiency (Eco-efficiency, Cleaner Production): Reducing the use of finite resources and energy throughout production and consumption processes while integrating renewable energy where possible. This aligns with eco-efficiency and cleaner production mechanisms, focusing on modification and redesign of existing processes to reduce input needs.[15]
  • Pollution and Waste Reduction (Pollution Control): Minimizing emissions, pollutants, and waste generation across the product life cycle aligns with pollution control and cleaner production, focusing on modification of existing production systems for lower environmental impact.[16]
  • Circular Economy (Closed-loop Production, Life-cycle Thinking): Designing products and processes for repairability, reusability, and recycling to extend product lifespans aligns with closed-loop production and life-cycle thinking, emphasizing alternatives and creation within technological eco-innovation mechanisms.[17]

Non-Technological

Non-technological eco-innovations address system-level and organizational changes required for sustainability transitions. They involve rethinking institutions, business models, marketing methods, and value chains to embed sustainability principles across all stages, from design and production to consumption and disposal.[13]

  • Systemic Approach (Industrial Ecology) Restructuring value chains, business models, and industrial systems to embed sustainability principles at every stage, from design to disposal.[18][19] This aligns with industrial ecology, focusing on system-level creation and alternatives for eco-innovation that go beyond technological changes, addressing institutions and organizational structures.[20]
  • Behavioral and Cultural Transformation: Sustainable innovation recognizes that lasting change requires shifts in societal values, norms, and behaviors over time.[3][21][22] This includes addressing bounded rationality as a key factor inhibiting behavioral change, going beyond mere nudging strategies to focus on measures that induce strong cognitive impact to boost intended behavioral changes.[23] The alignment of social, technological, and cultural dimensions in innovation journeys is essential for achieving sustainable outcomes.[3]

Key Dimensions of Sustainable Innovation

Sustainable innovation expands the traditional three dimensions of sustainability—environmental, economic, and social—by incorporating the often-overlooked behavioral and cultural dimensions. Some perspectives also include political dimensions, making sustainable innovation a comprehensive framework for addressing multifaceted challenges.[3][24] The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into innovation strategies is emphasized to restore natural ecosystems and promote circularity.[25]

Behavioral Dimension

The behavioral dimension is central to all 17 interlinked objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which serve as a "shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future."[25] This dimension acknowledges that sustainable innovation contributes to the economic transition towards a circular economy and multiple value creation, necessitating radical business model transformations.[7] Sustainable innovation strategies must align with the triple bottom line—economic, social, and environmental outcomes—to achieve long-term impact.[26]

Cultural Evolution and Progress

Sustainable innovation is closely linked to cultural evolution and societal progress, emphasizing the transformation of societal values and norms over time. The role of power dynamics in technological progress highlights how innovation can either reinforce existing inequalities or drive inclusive societal advancements.[27] Sustainable innovation seeks to ensure that technological revolutions align with broader social benefits rather than exacerbating disparities.

Types

Sustainability can be achieved through different types of innovation. Here are four key approaches:

Product innovation

Creating eco-friendly goods that meet consumer demands and lessen environmental damage.[28][29][30] Examples include the use of non-toxic chemicals, biodegradable and compostable materials, and goods that require less energy when in use.[31] Modular designs that provide simpler maintenance and upgrades, extending product life and lowering the need for additional resources, are another example of product improvements.[32]

Process innovation

The use of low-emission, energy-efficient, and cleaner manufacturing techniques in industrial processes.[33][34] This involves setting up closed-loop water or material systems to decrease resource usage and pollution during industrial operations, using renewable energy inside production lines, and using sophisticated manufacturing technologies that minimise waste and emissions.[34][35]

Business model innovation

Creating and adopting new ways of delivering value that align profitability with sustainability, such as product-as-a-service models, leasing systems, and sharing platforms.[36] These models encourage users to access rather than own products, promoting higher utilisation rates, enabling take-back and reuse systems by maintaining control over product life cycles to facilitate reuse, refurbishment, or recycling.[37]

System-Level innovation

Promoting significant changes in cities and industries to promote sustainable development. Examples include creating integrated zero-waste industrial parks, constructing smart city systems to maximise energy and resource use.[38][39]

Challenges

Environmental sustainable innovation faces multiple challenges that can slow adoption and effectiveness despite its critical role in sustainability transitions:

  • High Upfront Costs: Developing sustainable technologies and processes often involves significant initial investments in research, establishisng production systems, and building new infrastructure.[40]
  • Technological and Market Uncertainty: Many eco-innovations involve emerging technologies with unproven reliability at scale, leading to concerns about maintenance and return on investment.[41] Additionally, limited consumer demand for green products can hinder market development, making it challenging for innovators to justify early adoption.[42]
  • Regulatory Complexity: Inconsistent or fragmented environmental policies across regions can create uncertainty, making firms hesitant to invest in eco-innovations without clear, stable policy signals or supportive frameworks.[43]
  • Market Resistance and Consumer Behaviour: Even when green technologies are available, persistent consumer habits, limited awareness of environmental benefits, and perceptions of higher costs can slow their adoption, requiring targeted education and incentives to shift demand.[42]
  • Infrastructure Constraints: Many sustainable innovations depend on supporting infrastructure such as renewable energy grids, electric vehicle charging networks, and advanced recycling systems.[40][44]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Eco-Innovation". European Commission.
  2. ^ Pichlak, Magdalena; Szromek, Adam R. (2021-06-01). "Eco-Innovation, Sustainability and Business Model Innovation by Open Innovation Dynamics". Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 7 (2): 149. doi:10.3390/joitmc7020149. hdl:10419/241734. ISSN 2199-8531.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Visciola, Michele (2022), "Sustainable Innovation. Thinking as Behavior Scientists, Acting as Designers", Sustainable Innovation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, ISBN 978-3-031-18750-6, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  4. ^ "Better Policies to Support Eco-innovation". OECD. 15 March 2011.
  5. ^ Alinda, Kassim; Tumwine, Sulait; Kaawaase, Twaha Kigongo (2024-01-01). "Environmental innovations and sustainability practices of manufacturing firms in Uganda". Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 18 (2): 102–129. doi:10.1108/APJIE-08-2023-0164. ISSN 2398-7812.
  6. ^ "For manufacturers, the circular economy strengthens supply chains. Here's how". World Economic Forum. 2024.
  7. ^ a b Dommerholt, Egbert; Soltanifar, Mariusz; Bessant, John (2021-04-02), "Impact of sustainable innovation on organizational performance", Sustainable Innovation, Routledge, pp. 213–228, ISBN 978-0-429-29950-6, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  8. ^ a b "Sustainable innovation: build your company's capacity to change the world". Choice Reviews Online. 53 (04): 53–1851-53-1851. 2015-11-18. doi:10.5860/choice.193299. ISSN 0009-4978.
  9. ^ Le Bas, Christian. "Frugal innovation, sustainable innovation, reverse innovation: why do they look alike? Why are they different?". Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. doi:10.3917/jie.021.0009. ISSN 2032-5355.
  10. ^ Schaltegger, Stefan; Wagner, Marcus (2011-04-07). "Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions". Business Strategy and the Environment. 20 (4): 222–237. doi:10.1002/bse.682. ISSN 0964-4733.
  11. ^ Hautamäki, Antti; Oksanen, Kaisa (2016-02-24), "SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION: SOLVING WICKED PROBLEMS THROUGH INNOVATION", Open Innovation: Bridging Theory and Practice, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 87–110, retrieved 2026-01-12
  12. ^ "Sustainable innovation: analysing literature lineages", Handbook on Alternative Theories of Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 122–134, 2021-10-12, ISBN 978-1-78990-230-3, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  13. ^ a b c "Eco-Innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth" (PDF). OECD. 2009.
  14. ^ Paipa-Sanabria, Edwin Giovanny; Montoya, Daniel Gonzales; Hernandez, Jairo Coronado (2025-03-10). "Understanding Eco-Innovation: A Critical Examination of Theories and Tools for Achieving Societal Sustainability". Journal of Sustainability Research. 7 (1). doi:10.20900/jsr20250013.
  15. ^ "Renewables - Energy System". IEA. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  16. ^ Islam, Nazim Forid; Gogoi, Bhoirob; Saikia, Rimon; Yousaf, Balal; Narayan, Mahesh; Sarma, Hemen (2024-12-01). "Encouraging circular economy and sustainable environmental practices by addressing waste management and biomass energy production". Regional Sustainability. 5 (4) 100174. doi:10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100174. ISSN 2666-660X.
  17. ^ Kirchherr, Julian; Reike, Denise; Hekkert, Marko (2017). "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 127: 221–232. Bibcode:2017RCR...127..221K. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
  18. ^ Awan, Usama; Sroufe, Robert; Bozan, Karoly (2022-06-09). "Designing Value Chains for Industry 4.0 and a Circular Economy: A Review of the Literature". Sustainability. 14 (12): 7084. Bibcode:2022Sust...14.7084A. doi:10.3390/su14127084. ISSN 2071-1050.
  19. ^ Knudson, Haley (2023), Fet, Annik Magerholm (ed.), "Business Models for Sustainability", Business Transitions: A Path to Sustainability: The CapSEM Model, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 101–112, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22245-0_10, hdl:11250/3122992, ISBN 978-3-031-22245-0{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  20. ^ Shkarupeta, Elena; Babkin, Aleksandr (2024-09-01). "Eco-innovative development of industrial ecosystems based on the quintuple helix". International Journal of Innovation Studies. 8 (3): 273–286. doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.002. ISSN 2096-2487.
  21. ^ Dzionek-Kozłowska, Joanna (2025-03-20). "Review of the Book Power and Progress. Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson, Basic Books 2023, pp. 546". Ekonomista: 1–4. doi:10.52335/ekon/202841. ISSN 0013-3205.
  22. ^ Godin, Benoît (2019), "How does innovation sustain 'sustainable innovation'?", Handbook of Sustainable Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 27–37, ISBN 978-1-78811-257-4, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  23. ^ Visciòla, Michele (2025-06-20). "Rethinking Human-Centered Design: From Automation to Sustainable Innovation". Interactions. 32 (4): 22–27. doi:10.1145/3733153. ISSN 1072-5520.
  24. ^ Blowfield, Michael (2012-12-12), "Innovation planning, and design", Business and Sustainability, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-964298-4, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  25. ^ a b Awan, Usama (2021), "Steering for Sustainable Development Goals: A Typology of Sustainable Innovation", Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1026–1036, ISBN 978-3-319-95872-9, retrieved 2026-01-12{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  26. ^ Voinea, Cosmina L.; Roijakkers, Nadine; Ooms, Ward, eds. (2021-04-02). Sustainable Innovation. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-29950-6.
  27. ^ Acemoglu, Daron (2023). Power and Progress. Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. PublicAffairs.
  28. ^ Ramani, Karthik; Ramanujan, Devarajan; Bernstein, William Z.; Zhao, Fu; Sutherland, John; Handwerker, Carol; Choi, Jun-Ki; Kim, Harrison; Thurston, Deborah (2010-09-16). "Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review". Journal of Mechanical Design. 132 (91004). doi:10.1115/1.4002308. ISSN 1050-0472.
  29. ^ Biju, P. L.; Shalij, P. R.; Prabhushankar, G. V. (2015-12-01). "Evaluation of customer requirements and sustainability requirements through the application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process". Journal of Cleaner Production. 108: 808–817. Bibcode:2015JCPro.108..808B. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.051. ISSN 0959-6526.
  30. ^ US EPA, OP (2015-07-30). "Sustainable Manufacturing". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  31. ^ "What is an eco-friendly product ?". www.europe-consommateurs.eu. 2025-04-28. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  32. ^ "Design for easy Repair and Maintenance Sustainable | Product Design". milani.ch. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  33. ^ Zheng, Jun; Shi, Junjie; Lin, Feng; Hu, Xinyu; Pan, Qi; Qi, Tiening; Ren, Yicheng; Guan, Aizhi; Zhang, Zhiyi; Ling, Wei (2023-02-01). "Reducing manufacturing carbon emissions: Optimal low carbon production strategies respect to product structures and batches". Science of the Total Environment. 858 (Pt 3) 159916. Bibcode:2023ScTEn.85859916Z. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159916. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 36356727.
  34. ^ a b "Adapting to Clean Manufacturing: A Guide | SafetyCulture". SafetyCulture. 2022-03-18. Archived from the original on 2025-04-28. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  35. ^ Kara, Sami; Hauschild, Michael; Sutherland, John; McAloone, Tim (2022-01-01). "Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability?". CIRP Annals. 71 (2): 505–528. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.008. ISSN 0007-8506.
  36. ^ "Circular Business Model Innovation: Product-as-a-Service". kpmg.com. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  37. ^ Mignon, Ingrid; Bankel, Amanda (2023). "Sustainable business models and innovation strategies to realize them: A review of 87 empirical cases". Business Strategy and the Environment. 32 (4): 1357–1372. Bibcode:2023BSEnv..32.1357M. doi:10.1002/bse.3192. ISSN 1099-0836.
  38. ^ Bibri, Simon Elias; Krogstie, John (2017-05-01). "Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review". Sustainable Cities and Society. 31: 183–212. Bibcode:2017SusCS..31..183B. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016. hdl:11250/2478627. ISSN 2210-6707.
  39. ^ Chertow, Marian R. (2000-11-01). "INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 25 (2000): 313–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313. ISSN 1543-5938.
  40. ^ a b Onifade, Moshood; Zvarivadza, Tawanda; Adebisi, John A.; Said, Khadija Omar; Dayo-Olupona, Oluwatobi; Lawal, Abiodun Ismail; Khandelwal, Manoj (2024-06-01). "Advancing toward sustainability: The emergence of green mining technologies and practices". Green and Smart Mining Engineering. 1 (2): 157–174. doi:10.1016/j.gsme.2024.05.005. ISSN 2950-5550.
  41. ^ Lv, Wen-Dong; Tian, Dan; Wei, Yuan; Xi, Rui-Xue (2018-10-11). "Innovation Resilience: A New Approach for Managing Uncertainties Concerned with Sustainable Innovation". Sustainability. 10 (10): 3641. Bibcode:2018Sust...10.3641L. doi:10.3390/su10103641. ISSN 2071-1050.
  42. ^ a b "The Elusive Green Consumer". Harvard Business Review. 2019-07-01. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
  43. ^ Horbach, Jens; Rammer, Christian; Rennings, Klaus (2012). "Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull". Ecological Economics. 78: 112–122. Bibcode:2012EcoEc..78..112H. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005. hdl:10419/44979.
  44. ^ "Net Zero by 2050 – Analysis". IEA. 2021-05-18. Retrieved 2025-07-10.