Sindhob Amarin

Sindhob Amarin
สินธพอมรินทร์
King of Phraek Si Racha
Reign937–996
PredecessorSudhammaraja
SuccessorSundaradeśanā (Seat later shifted to Lavo)
King of Lavo
Reign940s–996
PredecessorKampoch (Under Tambralinga)
SuccessorSundaradeśanā (Ruled from Phraek Si Racha until the beginning of the 1000s)
King of Ayodhya
Reign980s–996
PredecessorGotraboṅ
SuccessorMerged into Phraek Si Racha and followed by 3 successive local rulers
(Title next held by Narai I)
Died996
Phraek Si Racha

Sindhob Amarin (Thai: สินธพอมรินทร์), also known by the abbreviated title Phraya Kreak (พญาแกรก), emerges as a monarch of the 10th century in mainland Southeast Asian historiography, principally attested in the Northern Chronicle,[1]: 30–3  the Ayutthaya Testimonies.[2]: 35  and the Testimony of Khun Luang Wat Pradu Songtham.[3]: ๓๖–๘  These sources identify him as a ruler exercising authority over the ancient polities of the Phraek Si Racha–Ayodhya historical region, a strategic zone within the central Menam Basin.[2]: 35  While the Ayutthaya Testimonies do not explicitly record the dates of his reign, a chronological reconstruction derived from the narrative framework of the Northern Chronicle suggests that Sindhob Amarin's rule extended approximately from 937 to 996 CE.[a] The polity of Lavo is also said to have come under his authority during this period.[4] Moreover, his reign also associated with the episode of Sricandradhipati, who, after being ordered arrested by the king of Indaprasthanagara, fled and was subsequently offered the throne of Sukhothai in 959 CE.[1]: 27–9 

This reconstructed reign period partially overlaps with that of Sudhammaraja, another ruler associated with Phraek Si Racha, whose reign is estimated to have lasted from 922 to 957 CE.[b] The apparent overlap can be plausibly reconciled by the testimony of the Ayutthaya Testimonies, which records that Sudhammaraja subsequently relocated northward to establish Phitsanulok as his new political seat.[2]: 37  On this basis, it is reasonable to infer that Sindhob Amarin's accession coincided with, or immediately followed, Sudhammaraja's departure from Phraek Si Racha.

No extant source explicitly records the dynastic relationship between Sindhob Amarin and his predecessor, Sudhammaraja. Nevertheless, his reign corresponds chronologically with a period during which Tambralinga exerted influence over the lower Menam Basin, approximately from 927 CE to the mid-10th century, with Lavo functioning as a principal regional power center.[10] The Sihinganidāna further records that in 1500 BE (958/59 CE) political authority associated with Sukhothai encountered that of Nakhon Si Thammarat (Tambralinga) to the south.[11]: 24 

Sindhob Amarin is also found in the regnal lists of Ayutthaya reconstructed by the Burmese compilers of the Ayutthaya Testimonies. However, these Burmese-derived king lists have subsequently been interpreted by Thai scholars as containing numerous errors and chronological inconsistencies when compared with other extant sources.[12]

Warfare

Narratives concerning Lavo

In 927 CE, Lavo is recorded as having come under the authority of King Sujita of Tambralinga. Three years later, he was succeeded by his son, Kampoch, who is said to have conducted several campaigns against polities in the Menam basin, including Haripuñjaya.[10] During one retreat from Haripuñjaya to Lavo, Kampoch reportedly led his forces to attack Nakaburi (นาคบุรี), but the attempt was unsuccessful.[13]

During the reconstructed reign of Sindhob Amarin (937–996 CE), Lavo is described in the Northern Chronicle as a tributary of Indaprasthanagara. In the same source, Sricandradhipati, originally named Ruang and identified as a commoner of Lavo, fled after being ordered arrested by the ruler of Indaprasthanagara and was subsequently offered the throne of Sukhothai in 959 CE.[1]: 27–9  The sources do not specify when Indaprasthanagara assumed control over Lavo from Tambralinga, and Nakaburi remains unidentified in relation to other contemporary polities.[13]

Conquest of Ayodhya

The Northern Chronicle further provides a narrative backdrop that illuminates Sindhob Amarin's military campaign. According to the chronicle, in 944 CE,[c] a nobleman from Mueang Bang Pan (บางพาน; in present-day Phran Kratai district) named Bhuddhasagara (พุทธสาคร) migrated southward and was subsequently enthroned as ruler of Mueang Wat Derm (เมืองวัดเดิม), later known as Ayodhya, located on the eastern bank of the Pasak River opposite the site of modern Ayutthaya Island. In 974 CE, Bhuddhasagara's son succeeded to the throne, only to be later deposed by Phraya Kreak. Upon this successful usurpation, Phraya Kreak assumed the regnal title Sindhob Amarin.[1]: 30–3 

Following his victory over the ruling house of Mueang Wat Derm, Sindhob Amarin consolidated political authority over both Mueang Wat Derm (Ayodhya) and Mueang Phreak, thereby unifying two key centers within the lower PasakMenam corridor. Notably, despite this expansion of control, he continued to maintain his principal seat of power at Phraek Si Racha.

Legacy

The legacy of Phraya Kreak persisted into the Ayutthaya period through regalia believed to have originated in his reign. Chief among these was the Phra Saeng Khan Chaiyasi (พระแสงขรรค์ไชยศรี; lit.'royal sword of victory'), regarded as a sacred emblem of kingship and employed in the royal oath-taking ceremony (พิธีถือน้ำ). A late Ayutthayan account, Testimony of Khun Luang Wat Pradu Songtham, states that this sword was lost during the succession conflict during the late period of King Thai Sa in the 18th century, when fleeing princes cast it into the river amid political turmoil.[4][3]: ๓๕–๘ 

Equally significant was the Crown of Phraya Kreak, which symbolized primordial royal authority and continuity of sovereignty. Unlike the sword, the crown was said to have survived the dynastic upheavals of the late Ayutthaya court and remained in royal possession until the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767.[3]: ๓๕–๘ 

Notes

  1. ^ Calculated from the text provided in the Northern Chronicle: Phrase 1: ...พระพุทธศักราช ๑๘๕๐...พระเจ้าสินธพอำมรินทร์เสวยราชสมบัติได้ ๓ ปี...[1]: 32  which is transcribed as ...Buddhist Era? 1850...Sindhob Amarin has been reigning for 3 years..., Phrase 2: ...จึงลบพระพุทธศักราช ๑๘๕๗ เปนจุลศักราช ๓๐๖...[1]: 33  transcribed as ... Buddhist Era? 1857 is changed to Chula Sakarat 306... On the basis of the two aforementioned textual references, it may be inferred that the reign of Sindhob Amarin commenced in Chula Sakarat 299 (corresponding to 937 CE). This chronological point appears to overlap with the reign of Bhuddhasagara and his son at Mueang Wat Derm. Consequently, the year 937 CE may reasonably be identified as the probable date of Sindhob Amarin’s enthronement at Mueang Phreak, and the Phrase 3: ...พระเจ้าสินธพอำมรินทร์เสวยราชสมบัติ ๕๙ ปี พระองค์สวรรคต... transcribed as ...Sindhob Amarin ruled for 59 years and died...[1]: 33  that means he died in 996 CE.
  2. ^ As Chen Li Fu was likewise centered in the Phraek Si Racha region,[5]: 18 [6]: 15  Chinese historical sources record that the dynasty’s first monarch ascended the throne in 1180 CE.[7]: 6–7  This chronological datum serves as a basis for retrospective calculation in determining the approximate period of reigns of the Siamese rulers belonging to this lineage. However, the Dong Mè Nang Mưo’ng Inscription (K. 766), dated to 1167 CE,[8] suggests that Sri Dharmasokaraja II may have extended his authority northward as far as present-day Nakhon Sawan Province, which would imply that the Phraek Si Racha region likewise fell under his control;[9]: 36–39  if this interpretation is accepted, the reigns of the Xiū Luó Fēn rulers in question must have ended no later than 1167 CE, rather than in 1180 CE.
  3. ^ Calculated from the text given in the chronicle: "สิ้น 97 ปีสวรรคต ศักราชได้ 336 ปี พระยาโคดมได้ครองราชสมบัติอยู่ ณ วัดเดิม 30 ปี"[1]: 30  which is transcribed as "…at the age of 97, he passed away in the year 336 of the Chula Sakarat. Phraya Kodom reigned in the Mueang Wat Derm for 30 years…."

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Phra Wichianpreecha (Noi) (1934). Northern Chronicle (in Thai). Royal Society of Thailand. Retrieved 2 October 2025.
  2. ^ a b c Fine Arts Department, ed. (1968) [First published in Thai in 1912.]. Khamhaikan Chao Krung Kao Khamhaikan Khun Luang Ha Wat Lae Phra Ratcha Pongsawadarn Krung Kao Chabab Luang Luang Prasoet Aksorn คำให้การชาวกรุงเก่า คำให้การขุนหลวงหาวัด และ พระราชพงศาวดารกรุงเก่าฉบับหลวงประเสริฐอักษรนิติ์ [Testimony of the King Who Entered a Wat, Testimony of the Inhabitants of the Old Capital, and Royal Chronicle of the Old Capital: Luang Prasoet Aksorn Version] (PDF) (in Thai). Bangkok: Rung Rueang Tham. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
  3. ^ a b c "คำให้การขุนหลวงวัดประดู่ทรงธรรม" [Testimony of Khun Luang Wat Pradu Songtham] (in Thai). Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. 2012. ISBN 978-616-505-785-1.
  4. ^ a b "ผ่าปม "พระยาแกรก" กษัตริย์ในตำนาน ทำพระเจ้าแผ่นดินวิตกจนสั่งกำจัดคนท้อง-ทารกทุกแห่ง" [Unraveling the mystery of "Phraya Kraek," a legendary king who caused the monarch such anxiety that he ordered the elimination of pregnant women and babies everywhere.]. www.silpa-mag.com (in Thai). 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2026.
  5. ^ Walailak Songsiri (2025). "ในดินแดนแห่งเจนลีฟู นครรัฐที่ไม่ได้อยู่ในอำนาจทางการเมืองของพระเจ้าชัยวรมันที่ ๗ สู่ปัญหาทางประวัตศาสตร์ที่หาทางออกไม่เจอของสังคมไทย" [In the land of Chen Li Fu, a city-state that was not under the political power of King Jayavarman VII, to the historical problems that cannot be solved for Thai society.]. Lek-Prapai Viriyahpant Foundation (in Thai). Retrieved 14 July 2025.
  6. ^ Walailak Songsiri (2025). ในดินแดนแห่งเจนลีฟูและตามหารากเง้าพระอาจารย์ธรรมโชติ [In the land of Cenlifu and searching for the roots of Master Thammachot] (in Thai). Lek-Prapai Viriyaphan Foundation.
  7. ^ O. W. Wolters (1960). "Chên Li Fu: A State On The Gulf Of Siam at the Beginning of the 14th Century". The Journal of the Siam Society. XLVIII.
  8. ^ "จารึกดงแม่นางเมือง" [Dong Mè Nang Mưo’ng Inscription]. Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (in Thai). 8 September 2025. Retrieved 18 December 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  9. ^ Chatchai Sukrakarn (October 2005). "พระเจ้าศรีธรรมาโศกราช" [Sri Thammasokaraj] (PDF) (in Thai). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 August 2024. Retrieved 6 November 2024.
  10. ^ a b "๑ สหัสวรรษ แห่ง "พระนิยม"". Fine Arts Department (in Thai). Archived from the original on 16 January 2026. Retrieved 16 January 2026.
  11. ^ Lha Amaramedho, Phra (2011). "การวิเคราะห์ตำนานสิหิงคนินานในล้านนา" [An Analysis of Sihinganidāna in Lanna] (PDF). Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University (in Thai).
  12. ^ "ตารางรายพระนามพระเจ้าแผ่นดิน" [List of Kings]. vajirayana.org (in Thai). Retrieved 27 February 2026.
  13. ^ a b เพ็ญสุภา สุขคตะ (12 September 2019). "ปริศนาโบราณคดี : 'สงครามสามนคร' (จบ) : การปรากฏนามของพระเจ้ากัมโพชแห่งกรุงละโว้?" (in Thai). Matichon. Archived from the original on 7 September 2025. Retrieved 25 December 2023.