Rosacea (cnidarian)

Rosacea
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Cnidaria
Class: Hydrozoa
Order: Siphonophorae
Family: Prayidae
Subfamily: Prayinae
Genus: Rosacea
Quoy & Gaimard, 1827[1]
Type species
Rosacea plicata
Bigelow, 1911 (by subsequent designation)
Species[2]
  • Rosacea arabiana Pugh, 2002
  • Rosacea cymbiformis (Delle Chiaje, 1830)
  • Rosacea flaccida Biggs, Pugh & Carré, 1978
  • Rosacea limbata Pugh & Youngbluth, 1988
  • Rosacea plicata Bigelow, 1911
  • Rosacea repanda Pugh & Youngbluth, 1988
Synonyms[2]

The Rosacea genus is a genus of hydrozoan cnidarians in the order Siphonophorae and the family Prayidae. They have been observed in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Mediterranean Sea, the Sargasso Sea, and the Gulf of Oman, with some species having worldwide distribution excluding polar waters.[5][6][7][8][9][10] The Rosacea genus is a pelagic, deep-sea, holoplanktonic species residing in the water column.[9] The genus contains bioluminescent species.[11]

Known Species

There is still a lot that is unknown about Siphonophores and the Rosacea genus specifically, however with continued research and dives in HOVs, ROVs, and AUVs, scientists are continue to discover more information. Currently, researchers have been able to identify at least six species of Rosacea siphonophores; Rosacea cymbiformis, R. plicata, R. flaccida, R. limbiata, R. repanda, and Rosacea arabiana. Each of the organisms share a similar body plan, with a hydroecial groove and lateral radial canals in the nectosac.[12] A deeper analysis of the physiology of Rosacea will be described in the next section of this page.

The major differences in each species lies in their relative locations and origins of discovery. The genus Rosacea was discovered by Quoy and Gaimard in 1827, and since their original discovery, which provided a description of the unknown organism, other researchers have been able to compare and discover new species of the Rosacea genus.[9]

Origins of Discovery

R. cymbiformis was discovered in 1830 by Delle Chiaje and are typically located in warmer waters, such as the North Atlantic, Mediterranean Sea, and parts of the Pacific Ocean along the coast of California.[13]

R. plicata was discovered in 1911 by Henry Bryant Bigelow, which was originally thought to have been discovered by Quoy and Gaimard. After examining the speciment and comparing it to thr description provided by Quoy and Gaimard, it was decided that the organisms were not the same, and R. plicata was a Bigelow discovery.[14]

R. limbata was discovered in 1988 by Pugh and Youngbluth in the North Atlantic. It can typically be found in the Northwest Providence Channel, around the Great Abaco Islands, the bahamas, and the North Atlantic.[15] Similar to R. plicata, it prefers to inhabit warmer waters.

Physiology

Like all siphonophores, Rosacea are colonial organisms composed of multicellular individuals called zooids that are added to the colonial organism through asexual reproduction. Zooids, while genetically identical, serve distinct functions within the siphonophore.[16] See Siphonophore for descriptions of some notable zooids.

Morphology and Distinguishing Features

Rosacea nectophores are cylindrical, containing nectosacs that are relatively small. A distinguishing characteristic of Rosacea is their typically S-shaped course of the lateral radial canals on the nectosacs, and ascending or descending branches to the simple somatocyst,[17] an oil-filled cavity found in the nectophore of the species (the swimming bell). Hydroecial canals have been described as both ?-shaped and S-shaped within the genus.[18][7][17] Important physiological features, like bracts and nectosacs, vary greatly in size from species to species within the Rosacea genus.[18] Gonophores, or specialized reproductive zooids, are asymmetric in all Rosacea species except R. flaccida. Some species, like Rosacea repanda and R. limbata, have frilled nectophores.[18]

While little work has been done on in-tact species of the Rosacea genus, researchers were able to study the real-time development of nematocysts in R. cymbiformis. Nematocysts are stinging capsules that develop on tentilla and stun and capture prey. In Rosacea, these nematocysts grow and develop within cnidoblasts, which then differentiate into a cnidocyte containing a functional nematocyst.[19]

When characterizing or distinguishing a Rosacea organism, the shape of the nectophore, the presence or absence of a distinct descending or ascending branch to the somatocyst, and the course of the lateral radial canals on the nectosac are primarily used.[20] When distinguishing one Rosacea species from another, the shape of the bracts, as well as the shape and nature of the nectophores, and specifically the course of the hydroecial canals,[7] are used.[18]

Diet and Hunting

Rosacea diets consists primarily of copepods, crab larvae, juvenile shrimp and mysids, and pelagic molluscs. Specific prey compositions vary greatly by individual, depending on specific organisms available in each siphonophores adjacent environment.[5] Since siphonophores are gelatinous zooplankton,[21] they lack strong swimming ability and thus cannot dart after prey like some other pelagic organisms. Thus, "Feeding selectivity likely depends on the speed and diameter of the prey," and the frequency at which they come in contact with the siphonophores tentacles, or tentilla.[22]

Challenges with Research

The Rosacea genus, like all siphonophores, is gelatinous. This makes them highly difficult to collect, disintegrating when coming into contact with a collecting net. Without intact species to study, learning about siphonophore biology and physiology is extremely difficult.[23] This often limits the number of species that can be collected once siphonophores are found, making in-depth research challenging even when some specimens are able to be collected.[24] This is the primary reason for it being a understudied marine order.[25] Some siphonophores have also been shown to be sensitive to changes in current and light, causing research vehicles like ROVs and HOVs to disrupt their natural behavior and make study more difficult.[26]

References

  1. ^ Quoy, J. R. C. & Gaimard, J. P. (1827). Observations zoologiques faites à bord de l'Astrolabe, en mai 1826, dans le Détroit de Gibraltar. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. 10: 5-21, 172-193, 225-239; pl. 1-2, 4-9., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6008318 page: 176
  2. ^ a b Schuchert, P. (2019). World Hydrozoa Database. Rosacea Quoy & Gaimard, 1827. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=135379 on 2019-10-15
  3. ^ Haeckel, E. (1888). Report on the Siphonophorae. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology. 28 (part 77): i-viii, 1-380, pl. 1-50., available online at http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-77/README.htm page(s): 108
  4. ^ Margulis, R. Ya. 1994. Revision of the genus Rosacea (Cnidaria, Siphonophora, Calycophorae, Prayidae, Prayinae). Zool. Zh. 73 (11): 15-28. (English translation in Hydrobiological Journal 31 (7): 33-50, 1995). page(s): 24, pl.3a-l
  5. ^ a b Purcell, J. E. (1981). "Selective predation and caloric consumption by the siphonophore Rosacea cymbiformis in nature". Marine Biology. 63 (3): 283–294. doi:10.1007/BF00395998. ISSN 0025-3162. Archived from the original on 2015-12-18.
  6. ^ "WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Rosacea cymbiformis (Delle Chiaje, 1830)". www.marinespecies.org. Retrieved 2026-03-17.
  7. ^ a b c Pugh, P. R. (February 2002). "A new species of Rosacea (Siphonophora: Calycophorae: Prayidae) from the Gulf of Oman". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 82 (1): 171–172. doi:10.1017/S0025315402005301. ISSN 1469-7769.
  8. ^ Biggs, D. C.; Pugh, P. R.; Carré, Claude (1978-01-01). "Rosacea flaccida n. sp., a new species of siphonophore (Calycophorae Prayinae) from the North Atlantic Ocean". Beaufortia. 27 (340): 207–218. ISSN 0067-4745.
  9. ^ a b c Mapstone, Gillian M. (2014). "Global diversity and review of Siphonophorae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa)". PLOS ONE. 9 (2) e87737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087737. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3916360. PMID 24516560.
  10. ^ "Meet the Siphonophores". Google Arts & Culture. Retrieved 2026-03-17.
  11. ^ Herring, Peter J. (1987). "Systematic distribution of bioluminescence in living organisms". Journal of Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence. 1 (3): 147–163. doi:10.1002/bio.1170010303. PMID 3503524.
  12. ^ Biggs, D. C.; Pugh, P. R.; Carré, Claude (1978-01-01). "Rosacea flaccida n. sp., a new species of siphonophore (Calycophorae Prayinae) from the North Atlantic Ocean". Beaufortia. 27 (340): 207–218. ISSN 0067-4745.
  13. ^ Biggs, D. C.; Pugh, P. R.; Carré, Claude (1978-01-01). "Rosacea flaccida n. sp., a new species of siphonophore (Calycophorae Prayinae) from the North Atlantic Ocean". Beaufortia. 27 (340): 207–218. ISSN 0067-4745.
  14. ^ "WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Rosacea plicata Bigelow, 1911". www.marinespecies.org. Retrieved 2026-03-18.
  15. ^ "Rosacea limbata | Smithsonian Institution". www.si.edu. Retrieved 2026-03-18.
  16. ^ Dunn, Casey (2009-03-24). "Siphonophores". Current Biology. 19 (6): R233–R234. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.009. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 19321136.
  17. ^ a b Three new species of prayine siphonophore (Calycophorae, Prayidae) collected by a submersible, with notes on related species. 1987.
  18. ^ a b c d Mapstone, Gillian M. (June 2005). "Re-description of Rosacea cymbiformis, a prayine siphonophore (from the Mediterranean Sea), with comments on nectophore designation and bract orientation". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 85 (3): 709–721. doi:10.1017/S0025315405011628. ISSN 1469-7769.
  19. ^ Skaer, R. J. (1973-09-01). "The secretion and development of nematocysts in a siphonophore". Journal of Cell Science. 13 (2): 371–393. doi:10.1242/jcs.13.2.371. ISSN 0021-9533. PMID 4148557.
  20. ^ Pugh, P. R. (1992). "DESMOPHYES HAEMATOGASTER, A NEW SPECIES OF PRA YINE SIPHONOPHORE (CALYCOPHORAE, PRA YIDAE)" (PDF). Bulletin of Marine Science. 50 (1): 89–96.
  21. ^ Park, Nayeon; Lee, Wonchoel (2022-06-17). "Eight New Records of Siphonophores (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) in Korean Waters". Diversity. 14 (6): 494. doi:10.3390/d14060494. ISSN 1424-2818.
  22. ^ "Woolly siphonophore • MBARI". MBARI. Retrieved 2026-03-14.
  23. ^ Dunn, Casey (2009-03-24). "Siphonophores". Current Biology. 19 (6): R233–R234. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.009. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 19321136.
  24. ^ Damian-Serrano, A.; Haddock, S. H. D.; Dunn, C. W. (2021). "The Evolutionary History of Siphonophore Tentilla: Novelties, Convergence, and Integration". Integrative Organismal Biology (Oxford, England). 3 (1) obab019. doi:10.1093/iob/obab019. ISSN 2517-4843. PMC 8331849. PMID 34355122.
  25. ^ Panasiuk, A.; Grzonka, L.; Prątnicka, P.; Wawrzynek-Borejko, J.; Szymelfenig, M. (2020-10-01). "Zonal variability of pelagic Siphonophora (Cnidaria) in the atlantic sector of the southern ocean". Journal of Sea Research. 165 101951. doi:10.1016/j.seares.2020.101951. ISSN 1385-1101.
  26. ^ Sutherland, Kelly R.; Gemmell, Brad J.; Colin, Sean P.; Costello, John H. (2019-09-05). "Maneuvering Performance in the Colonial Siphonophore, Nanomia bijuga". Biomimetics. 4 (3): 62. doi:10.3390/biomimetics4030062. ISSN 2313-7673. PMC 6784285. PMID 31491890.