Polarized pluralism

Polarized pluralism is multi-party political system with a lot of established parties (at least five) that are far away on the political spectrum with sometimes irreconcilable agendas, presence of successful anti-system opposition, and "centrifugal pressure" from the center to the fringes.[1]

The configuration was originally defined by political philosopher Giovanni Sartori.[2] In this system, the moderate views are replaced by polarized views, leading to dysfunctional governments.

The term is typically used to describe highly unstable party systems of Weimar Germany, the French Fourth Republic, and the post-war Italian Republic.[1] The phrase was also used by Roger Cohen, a jornalist writing in the New York Times to describe American politics about energy.[3]

References

  1. ^ a b Patton 2026, p. 84.
  2. ^ Sartori 1976, p. 132.
  3. ^ Cohen 2010.

Sources

  • Cohen, Roger (2010-11-08). "Energy lessons". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-11-08. Perhaps there's something to treadmill wisdom. We're all so narrow-band these days, using the vast resources of broadband to direct ourselves into a chosen ideological and news tunnel. Polarized pluralism defines us.
  • Patton, David F. (Spring 2026). "Voting the Bums Out or Echoes of Weimar?: The FDP, Greens, AfD, Left Party, and BSW in the 2025 Bundestag Election" (PDF). German Politics and Society. 44 (1): 84–102. doi:10.3167/gps.2026.440105.
  • Sartori, Giovanni (1976). "Competitive Systems". Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 131–173.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.