English Phonotypic Alphabet

The English Phonotypic Alphabet (EPA) is a phonetic alphabet developed by Sir Isaac Pitman and Alexander John Ellis, originally as an English language spelling reform.[2] Although never gaining wide acceptance, elements of it were incorporated into the modern International Phonetic Alphabet.[3]

It was originally published in June 1845 in The Phonotypic Journal, a sister publication of The Phonetic Journal.[4] Subsequently, adaptations were published which extended the alphabet to the German, Arabic, Spanish, Tuscan, French, Welsh, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese and Sanskrit languages.[5]

26 EPA letters are in the pipeline for publication by Unicode in 2026.[6]

Purpose

The philosophical case for the EPA was made by Ellis, who conducted an extensive study of the problems with English orthography, which he published in his treatise Plea for Phonetic Spelling, or the Necessity of Orthographic Reform, in 1848.[7] Learned societies such as the London Philological Society and education journals such as The Massachusetts Teacher debated the arguments for reform and the utility of the EPA.[8][9]

When the EPA was trialled for teaching literacy, it was found that after learning to read and write, students effortlessly transitioned their literacy skills to traditional English orthography. This gave additional purpose to the EPA for being used as a transitional mechanism to improve the teaching of literacy.[10][11]

Letters

The EPA had many different letter systems, depending on the author. Below are two early examples.

1843

At this stage, long vowels had a cross-bar, and short vowels did not. There were also no lowercase letterforms; only capital forms were used.

Vowels
EPA IPA
Ɨ I /iː ɪ/
E /eɪ ɛ/
A Ʌ /ɑː æ/[a]
Ɵ O /ɔː ɒ/
Ʉ U /oʊ ʌ/
/uː ʊ/
Ǝ /ɜː ə/[b]
Semivowels
Y /j/
W /w/
Diphthongs[c]
Ɯ (= I) /iu/
Y (= ɅI) /aɪ/
(= O) /aʊ/
Consonants
EPA IPA
P B /p b/
T D /t d/
J /tʃ dʒ/
K G /k ɡ/
F V /f v/
Θ Δ ð/
S Z /s z/
Σ Σ ʒ/
L /l/
R /r/
M /m/
N /n/
/ŋ/
H /h/
  1. ^ ⟨Ʌ⟩ may conceivably represent /a/ rather than /æ/ in dialects with the more open pronunciation.
  2. ^ The two forms of the "obscure vowel" are evidently ambiguous. The words a (article) and serve are written with ⟨Ǝ⟩, the words specimen and gladness are written with , and the word the is written with both (in separate instances).
  3. ^ The diphthong /ɔɪ/ did not have its own letter in this edition, but gains one in subsequent editions. Here it is written with ⟨OƗ⟩ in the word joyful and ⟨ƟƗ⟩ in the word noise.

1847

Monophthongs
Front Back
Close Ɛɛ ɯ
Near-close Ii
Open-mid Ee Uu Oo
Near-open Ɵɵ
Diphthongs ending with an unrounded vowel
Front Back
Close-mid a
Near-open
Open
Diphthongs ending with a rounded vowel
Front Back
Close
Close-mid ɷ
Open
Consonants
Labial Coronal Dorsal Laryngeal
Bilabial Labiodental Dental Alveolar Postalveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal Mm Nn ŋ
Plosive Pp Bb Tt Dd Cc Gg
Sibilant affricate Jj
fricative Ss Zz Σʃ ʒ
Non-sibilant Ff Vv Ƌ Hh
Approximant median Rr Yy Ww
lateral Ll

Teaching Literacy

The ultimate objective of the EPA was to improve literacy levels; as such, to demonstrate its efficacy, it was trialled for teaching literacy in many different settings. It was mainly tried in schools with children but also illiterate inmates of workhouses, reformatories and jails and by missionaries in Africa, China & India. In 1849, its potential was shown when 1,300 Mancunian illiterates were taught to read and write in only a few months.[12]

These trials culminated in the adoption of the EPA in two public school districts in the United States: Waltham, Massachusetts, between 1852–60 and Syracuse, New York, between 1850–66. Both districts used a variant of the EPA known as the Cincinnati Phonotypy or the American Phonetic Alphabet.[13] This type was used by Longley Brothers to publish a set of reading-books: a first phonetic reader, a second phonetic reader, and a transition reader.[14][15][16]

Waltham

In the 1852–53 annual report of Waltham's school committee, the chairman, Reverend Thomas Hill, reported the effect of learning the EPA on the 800 pupils within the ten schools:[17]

It has been proved in repeated experiment that if a child upon his first learning his letters, is taught the Phonetic Alphabet, and is confined to Phonetic books for the first six to eight months of schooling, he will at the end of the first year's schooling read common print and spell in common spelling better than children will ordinarily do at the end of four or five year's instruction.[12]

Syracuse

Bothe's analysis of the course of study for the Syracuse school district measured the improvement from using the EPA:

In 1855, before the introduction of the transitional alphabet, the student was expected to finish reading Webb's Second Reader by the end of the third grade. In 1858, the first year in which phonetic texts appeared in the course of study, Webb's Second Reader was entirely completed two-thirds through the second grade (four trimesters gained).[18]

Successor

Edwin Leigh extensively practised using the EPA to teach literacy. He became persuaded of its efficacy and a passionate advocate but failed to convince his own St. Louis school district to adopt it. He concluded that the EPA was not widely accepted because parents, teachers, and district officials could not understand the orthography themselves.[19] Leigh subsequently designed a spiritual successor system, Pronouncing Orthography, in an attempt to address some of these flaws.[20]

References

  1. ^ Mason, Cai (25 January 2019). "Bath Abbey: Revelations from Abbey Chambers, Kingston Buildings and the 4th Fonetik Institut". Wessex Archaeology. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  2. ^ Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William, eds. (1996). The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University Press. p. 831. ISBN 0-19-507993-0.
  3. ^ Coulmas, Florian (12 March 1999). "English Phonotypic Alphabet". The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Wiley. ISBN 0-631-21481-X.
  4. ^ "Completion of the Phonotypic Alphabet". The Phonotypic Journal. 4 (42). Bath: Phonographic Institution: 105–106. June 1845.
  5. ^ "Extension of the Phonotypic Alphabet". The Phonotypic Journal. 4 (43). Bath: Phonographic Institution: 121–123. June 1845.
  6. ^ [1]
  7. ^ Ellis 1848, pp. 1–195.
  8. ^ Blake, F.N. (1 March 1850). "Spelling Reform". The Massachusetts Teacher. III (3): 83–85 – via Internet Archive.
  9. ^ Marshall 2020, p. 2.
  10. ^ Hill, Thomas (3 July 1856). "Phonotypy as a Reading Reform". The Four Ways of Teaching to Read: An Address Delivered Before the Ohio Teachers' Association, July 3rd, 1856. Cincinnati: Longley Brothers. pp. 14–15.
  11. ^ Withers 2023, pp. 59–76.
  12. ^ a b Pitman & St. John 1969, p. 85.
  13. ^ Bothe 1967, p. 38.
  14. ^ Longley 1851a.
  15. ^ Longley 1851b.
  16. ^ Longley 1855.
  17. ^ Hill 1889, pp. 186–187.
  18. ^ Bothe 1967, pp. 55–56.
  19. ^ Leigh 1864, p. 3.
  20. ^ Leigh 1864, p. 6.

Bibliography

See also