Fusarium solani species complex

Fusarium solani species complex
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Ascomycota
Class: Sordariomycetes
Order: Hypocreales
Family: Nectriaceae
Genus: Fusarium
Species complex: Fusarium solani species complex
Synonyms

The Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC) is a group of filamentous fungi in the division Ascomycota, family Nectriaceae. Members are common soil-inhabiting molds.[2] Members of this group are implicated in plant diseases as well as in serious human diseases such as fungal keratitis.[3]

This species complex includes at least 50 species.[4] They were originally all considered a singular species Fusarium solani on the basis of morphology, until genetic methods that were able to differentiate between them were developed. Each of them has genetic characteristics that justify their distinction from another,[5] reflecting adaptations to different hosts and habits. For example, the actual Fusarium solani is not associated with bean root rot.[4] Nevertheless, due to the difficulty of distinguishing them without using genetic methods, non-taxonomic sources tend to still call all of them F. solani, sometimes with additional infraspecific designations such as forma and forma specialis.[1]

The "FSSC" naming reflects a "lumper" view commonly adopted by researchers who deal with these fungi as pathogens under the genus Fusarium.[4] "Splitter" fungal taxonomists refer to FSSC as Neocosmospora.[6]

History and taxonomy

Fusarium solani
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Ascomycota
Class: Sordariomycetes
Order: Hypocreales
Family: Nectriaceae
Genus: Fusarium
Species:
F. solani
Binomial name
Fusarium solani
(Mart.) Sacc. (1881)
Synonyms

Homotypic

  • Fusisporium solani Mart. (1842)
  • Fusarium solani (Mart.) Appel & Wollenw. (1910)
  • Neocosmospora solani (Martius) L. Lombard & Crous (2015)

Heterotypic, anamorph

  • Fusarium martii Appel & Wollenw. (1910)
  • Nectria cancri Rutgers (1913)
  • Fusarium striatum Sherb. (1915)
  • Fusarium solani var. minus Wollenw. (1916)
  • Cephalosporium keratoplasticum T. Morik. (1939)
  • Fusarium solani f. keratitis Y.N. Ming & T.F. Yu (1966)
  • Cylindrocarpon vaginae C. Booth, Y.M. Clayton & Usherw. (1985)

The genus Fusarium was described in 1809 by Link.[7] In the 1930s, Wollenweber and Reinking organized the genus Fusarium into sections, including Martiella and Ventricosum,[7] which were collapsed together by Snyder and Hansen in the 1940s to form a single species, Fusarium solani;[7] one of nine Fusarium species they recognized based on morphological features.[2] "F. solani" in this historical, morphological classification actually constitutes a species complex consisting of multiple, closely related and morphologically poorly distinguishable, "cryptic" species with characteristic genetic differences.[5] This species complex includes the sexual species, Nectria haematococca, in the family Nectriaceae (phylum Ascomycota).[3]

There is a "lumper and splitter" problem surrounding the anamorphic genus Fusarium, which affects the taxonomy of the genus. The "lumper" view holds that there should be a large Fusarium that would include all of this complex. It is more similar to the traditional taxonomy used by disease specialists and has more acceptance among them.[4][8] The "splitter" view holds that the existing finer splits based on teleomorphic morphology[a] should be respected and revised. In such a view, genus Neocosmospora should be adjusted to all of the species complex.[6] Both views are based on molecular phylogeny, with the trees largely agreeing with each other; the question is merely where to draw the boundaries on the trees.[4][6]

As of March 2026:

  • MycoBank appears to mostly follow the splitter view, with Neocosmospora species names generally being accepted over the Fusarium names.[9]
  • Species Fungorum appears to largely either prefer the Fusarium over the Neocosmospora name[10] or accept both.[11]

Phylogeny

Internal phylogeny, three loci (tef1, rpb2, and rDNA), maximum likelihood:[4]

FSSC C. 1

F. iludens NRRL 22090 NZ

F. plagianthi NRRL 22632 NZIT

FSSC C. 2

F. mahasenii FRC S 1845T

F. kelerajum FRC S 1836T

F. acutisporum NRRL 22574T

F. venezuelense NRRL 22395T

F. kurunegalense CBS 119599T

F. nirenbergiae NRRL 22387T

F. cryptoseptatum NRRL 22412T

F. samuelsii CBS 114067T

F. cuneirostrum NRRL 31104

F. phaseoli NRRL 22276

F. tucumaniae NRRL 31096T

F. crassistipitatum NRRL 31949

F. azukicola NRRL 54364

F. virguliforme NRRL 31041

F. brasiliense NRRL 31757

SDS & BRR
FSSC C. 3

F. rectiphorus CBS 125727T

F. haematococcum CBS 119600ET

F. piperis NRRL 22570ET

F. cucurbiticola NRRL 22399T [FSSC 10]

F. protoensiforme NRRL 22178T [FSSC 32]

F. riograndense UFMG CM F12570T (M)

F. lichenicola NRRL 28030 [FSSC 16] (M)

F. ramosum CBS 509.63T

F. neocosmosporiellum NRRL 22166 [FSSC 8] (M)
= N. vasinfecta

F. ornamentatum NRRL 22438T

F. tenuicristatum NRRL 22155T

F. boninense NRRL 22470T

'Neocosmospora' morphology

F. borneensis NRRL 22579ET [FSSC 30]

F. pseudensiforme NRRL 46517T [FSSC 33] (M)

F. obliquiseptatum AF7 NRRL 62611T

F. ambrosium AF1 NRRL 22346ET [FSSC 19]

F. euwallaceae AF2 NRRL 54722T

F. floridanum AF3 NRRL 62628T

F. oligoseptatum AF4 NRRL 62579T

F. tuaranense AF5 NRRL 22231T

F. kuroshium AF12 NRRL 62945

"Ambrosia" clade

F. stercicola CBS 142481T

F. crassum CBS 144386T [FSSC 34] (M)

F. suttonianum NRRL 32858T [FSSC 20] (M)

F. falciforme CBS 475.67T [FSSC 3+4] (M)

F. tonkinense NRRL 53586T [FSSC 9]

F. croci CPC 27186T

F. martii CBS 115659ET

F. solani-melongenae NRRL 22657 [FSSC 21]

F. noneumartii CBS 115658T [FSSC 42]

F. keratoplasticum NRRL 22661T [FSSC 2] (M)

F. solani NRRL 66304ET [FSSC 5] (M)

F. amplum CBS 202.32T

F. breviconum NRRL 22659ET

F. yamamatoi NRRL 22277ET [FSSC 22]

F. bataticola NRRL 22427

F. bataticola NRRL 22402T [FSSC 23]

F. pseudotonkinensis CBS 143038T (M)

F. paraeumartii NRRL 13997T

F. waltergamsii NRRL 32323 7T [FSSC 7] (M)

F. metavorans NRRL 43489 [FSSC 6] (M)

F. diminutum CBS 144390T [FSSC 39]

F. breve CBS 144387T [FSSC 15] (M)

F. vanettenii NRRL 45880T [FSSC 11] (M)
= Nectria haematococca mating population MPV

F. mori NRRL 22230T [FSSC 17]

F. quercinum NRRL 22652T [FSSC 14] (M)

F. regulare CBS 190.35

F. silvicola CBS 123846T [FSSC 13]

F. oblongum NRRL 28008T [FSSC 29] (M)

F. ngaiotongaense CBS 126407T

F. catenatum NRRL 54993T [FSSC 43]

F. cyanescens NRRL 37625T [FSSC 27] (M)

F. spathulatum NRRL 28541T [FSSC 26] (M)

F. macrosporum CBS 142424T

F. ferrugineum NRRL 32437T [FSSC 28] (M)

F. bostrycoides CBS 144.25NT [FSSC 25] (M)

F. parceramosum CBS 115695T

F. petroliphilum NRRL 22268 [FSSC 1] (M)

F. liriodendri NRRL 22389T [FSSC 24]

F. pseudoradicicola NRRL 25137T [FSSC 37]

F. perseae CPC 26829T

F. hypothenemi NRRL 52782T [FSSC 38]

Notes and abbreviations:

  • "FSSC C." is the FSSC clade numbering
  • [FSSC (number)] is a historical numbering used in the early stages of differentiating FSSC species
  • (M) indicates medically important species
  • Data derived from TreeBase study S27101, tree Tr129542, which does not fully match the paper's Figure 2.

External relations (phylogeny of Netriaceae clade IX), using the "splitter" genus concepts:[6]

Rectifusarium

Bisfusarium

Neocosmospora = FSSC

Albonectria

Fusarium sensu stricto

Geejayessia

Cyanonecteria

For more extensive synonymy lists, consult the two rival nomenclature papers.[4][6]

Growth and morphology

Like other species in its genus, FSSC produces colonies that are white and cottony. However, instead of developing a pink or violet centre like most Fusarium species,[12] FSSC becomes blue-green or bluish brown.[3][12][13] On the underside, they may be pale, tea-with-milk-brown, or red-brown.[3] However, some clinical isolates have been blue-green or ink-blue on the underside.[3] FSSC colonies are low-floccose, loose, slimy, and sporadic.[3] When grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA), this fungus grows rapidly, but not as rapidly as Fusarium oxysporum.[13] In PDA, FSSC colonies reach a diameter of 64–70 mm in 7 days.[3]

FSSC has aerial hyphae that give rise to conidiophores laterally.[3] The conidiophores branch into thin, elongated monophialides that produce conidia.[3][13] Phialides that produce macroconidia are shorter than those that produce microconidia.[3] The macroconidia produced by FSSC are slightly curved, hyaline, and broad,[3] often aggregating in fascicles.[14] Typically the macroconidia of this species have 3 septa but may have as many as 4–5.[3][14] Microconidia have thickened basal cells and tapered, rounded apical cells.[3] However, some FSSC isolates have pointed, rather than rounded, macroconidia.[3] Microconidia are oval or cylindrical, hyaline, and smooth.[3] Some microconidia may be curved.[3] Microconidia typically lack septa, but occasionally they may have up to two.[3] Fusarium solani also forms chlamydospores most commonly under suboptimal growth conditions.[14] These may be produced in pairs or individually.[13][14] They are abundant, have rough walls, and are 6-11 μm.[3] FSSC chlamydospores are also brown and round.[15]

Ecology

FSSC is found in soil worldwide.[2] However, a given species within the complex may not be as widespread[2] and may not have the same ecology as others in the complex.[14] In general, as a soil fungus, FSSC is associated with the roots of plants[3] and may be found as deep in the ground as 80 cm.[14] It is frequently isolated in tropic, subtropic, and temperate locations, and less frequently isolated from alpine habitats.[14] The pH of soil does not have a significant effect on FSSC, however, soil fumigation causes an increase in occurrence.[14] FSSC is typically sensitive to soil fungicides.[14] FSSC has been found in ponds, rivers, sewage facilities, and water pipes.[3] It has also been found in larvae and adults of the picnic beetle, is a symbiote of the ambrosia beetle.[14]

Life cycle

FSSC can be found in soils worldwide, where its chlamydospores overwinter on plant tissue/seed or as mycelium in the soil.[16] The pathogen enters hosts through developing roots, where it can infect the host. After infection, F. solani produces asexual macro and microconidia which are dispersed through wind and rain.[17] The pathogen can persist in the soil for a decade, and if left unchecked can cause complete crop loss.

Physiology and biochemistry

FSSC have 5-13 chromosomes,[7][14] with a genome size of about 40 Mb.[7] The GC-content of its DNA is 50%.[14] Mycelium of FSSC is rich in the amino acid alanine, as well as a range of fatty acids including δ-aminobutyric-, palmitic-, oleic-, and linolenic acids.[14] Fusarium solani requires potassium for growth,[14] and develops a feathery pattern when potassium levels are below 3 mM.[7] In culture the following disaccharides are utilized (from most- to least preferential): mannose, rhamnose and sorbose.[14] This species can decompose cellulose at an optimal pH of 6.5 and temperature of 30 °C.[14] It can also metabolise steroids and lignin,[7] and reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+.[14] Fusarium solani produces mycotoxins like Fusaric acid and naphthoquinones.[3][18] Other toxins have also been isolated from FSSC members, including:

Pathology

Humans

FSSC is largely resistant to typical antifungal agents.[7] The most effective antifungals in treating FSSC infections are amphotericin B and natamycin; however, these agents have only modest success in the treatment of serious systemic infection.[7]

As of 2006, there has been increasing evidence that FSSC can act as a causal agent of mycoses in humans.[19] FSSC has been implicated in the following diseases: disseminated disease, osteomyelitis, skin infection, fungemia, and endophthalmitis.[20] Half of human disease involving Fusarium is caused by FSSC and it is involved in most cases of systemic fusariosis and corneal infections.[5] In immunocompromised patients, FSSC is one of the most common agents in disseminated and cutaneous infections.[3]

In the southern USA, fungal keratitis has been most commonly caused by FSSC, as well as F. oxysporum (loosely defined, also a species complex). Cases occur most frequently during harvest season as a result of corneal trauma from dust or plant material. Fungal spores come into contact with the damaged cornea and grow. Without treatment, the hyphae can grow into the cornea and into the anterior chamber of the eye.[21] FSSC is also a major cause of fungal keratitis in HIV positive patients in Africa.[3]

As of 2011, FSSC was implicated in cases of fungal keratitis involving the Bausch and Lomb ReNu contact lens solution.[5] Some members of FSSC can produce a biofilm on soft contact lenses. However, when lenses are cleaned correctly with solution, these biofilms are prevented.[5] Prevention also includes leaving lenses in polyhexanide biguanide solution overnight to inhibit FSSC.[3] Other risk factors of contact lens-related Fusarium keratitis include use of daily-wear lenses beyond the recommended timeline and overnight wear.[5]

An investigation into a meningitis outbreak of 79 cases since October 2022, which had killed 35 people (34 of them women who had undergone cesarean section) in Durango (city) revealed contamination of bupivacaine with Fusarium solani in 4 batches, used by an anesthesiologist.[22] US news reported however, that the anesthesiologist used multi-dose vials of morphine, which he would administer in more than one patient for his anesthesias in the 4 private hospitals.[23] As of May 26, 2023 WHO had been asked to declare a public health emergency.[24]

As of June 1, 2023, a multistate outbreak of meningitis due to FSSC was ongoing among patients who underwent epidural anesthesia at two clinics in the Mexican city of Matamoros, Tamaulipas, with a total of 212 residents in 25 US states identified as being at risk, two of whom had died.[25][26]

Other animals

FSSC is implicated in cutaneous infections of young turtles as well as infections of turtle egg shells.[3] It has also caused infections in Australian crocodile farms, sea lions and grey seals.[3] FSSC is a facultative pathogen of the castor bean tick. It is also lethal to southern pine beetles.[14]

Plants

FSSC rots the roots of its host plant.[27] It also causes soft rot of plant tissues by penetrating plant cell walls and destroying the torus.[14] It is implicated, along with Pythium myriotylum, in pod rot of the pods of groundnuts.[14] FSSC can cause damping off, corn rot, and root rot, as well as sudden death of soybeans (SDS). It is a very generalistic fungal species and has been known to infect peas, beans, potatoes, and many types of cucurbits.[28] Symptoms include general plant decline, wilting, and large necrotic spots on tap roots.

Recently the pathogen has also done serious damage to olive trees throughout the mediterranean.

Virulence of this agent in plants is controlled by the cutinase genes cut1 and cut2. These genes are upregulated by exposure to the plant's cutin monomers.[29] FSSC is known to cause sudden death syndrome in soybeans, and it is also known to cause disease in other economically important crops such as avocado, citrus, orchids, passion fruit, peas, peppers, potato, and squash.[7]

Management

Agriculture

The ubiquitous nature of FSSC gives rise to a plethora of management practices developed independently. One particular method is the use of the bacterial complex Burkholderia cepacia,  which is a registered control method. This bacterial complex has been shown to produce several types of antibiotics (depending on the strain), and can act as a substitute for chemical pesticides.[30] Precautionary methods include planting during warm/dry weather, 3 plus years of crop rotation of non host species, and avoiding dense seed planting.[16]

Humans

In the 2023 Matamoros outbreak of "F. solani meningitis", CDC recommended liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole,[31] however, disease progressed on this regimen,[26] and patients were trialed on fosmanogepix through a compassionate use authorization.

Biotechnology

FSSC has been investigated as a biological control for certain plants including leafy spurge, morning glory, striga, gourd, and water hyacinth.[7]

References

  1. ^ Teleomorphic (sexual) morphology tends to be more divergent than the asexual form, so teleomorphic genera tend to he finer-grained even when only based on morphology.
  1. ^ a b Šišić, Adnan; Baćanović-Šišić, Jelena; Al-Hatmi, Abdullah M. S.; Karlovsky, Petr; Ahmed, Sarah A.; Maier, Wolfgang; de Hoog, G. Sybren; Finckh, Maria R. (2018-01-19). "The 'forma specialis' issue in Fusarium: A case study in Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 1252. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19779-z. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5775210. PMID 29352160. S2CID 12781876.
  2. ^ a b c d Summerell, Brett A.; Laurence, Matthew H.; Liew, Edward C. Y.; Leslie, John F. (14 September 2010). "Biogeography and phylogeography of Fusarium: a review". Fungal Diversity. 44 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1007/s13225-010-0060-2. S2CID 37051295.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Summerbell, Richard (2003). "Ascomycetes: Aspergillus, Fusarium, Sporothrix, Piedraia, and Their Relatives". In Howard, Dexter H. (ed.). Pathogenic Fungi in Humans and Animals (2 ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 400–425. ISBN 978-0824706838.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Geiser, David M; Al-Hatmi, Abdullah; Aoki, Takayuki; Arie, Tsutomu (2020-11-17). "Phylogenomic analysis of a 55.1 kb 19-gene dataset resolves a monophyletic Fusarium that includes the Fusarium solani Species Complex". Phytopathology. 111 (7). American Phytopathological Society: 1064–1079. doi:10.1094/phyto-08-20-0330-le. hdl:2434/797012. ISSN 0031-949X. PMID 33200960. S2CID 226991166.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Manikandon, Palanisamy; Galgoczy, Laszlo; Selvam, Kanesan Panneer; Shobana, Coimbatore Subramanian; Kocsube, Sandor; Vagvolgyi, Csaba; Narendran, Venkatapathy; Kredics, Laszlo (2011). "Fusarium". In Liu, Dongyou (ed.). Molecular Detection of Human Fungal Pathogens. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 418–424. ISBN 9781439812402.
  6. ^ a b c d e Lombard, L.; van der Merwe, N.A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. (2015). "Generic concepts in Nectriaceae". Studies in Mycology. 80. Elsevier BV: 189–245. doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2014.12.002. ISSN 0166-0616. PMC 4779799. PMID 26955195.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Leslie, John F.; Summerell, Brett A. (2006). The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Ames: Blackwell. pp. 250–254. ISBN 978-0813819198.
  8. ^ Geiser, David M.; Aoki, Takayuki; Bacon, Charles W.; Baker, Scott E. (2013). "One Fungus, One Name: Defining the Genus Fusarium in a Scientifically Robust Way That Preserves Longstanding Use". Phytopathology. 103 (5). American Phytopathological Society: 400–408. doi:10.1094/phyto-07-12-0150-le. hdl:2263/31751. ISSN 0031-949X. PMID 23379853.
  9. ^ "Fusarium illudens". Retrieved 15 March 2026.
  10. ^ "Species Fungorum - Name record 810959". Species Fungorum. Retrieved 15 March 2026.
  11. ^ "Species Fungorum - Name record 519847". Species Fungorum.
  12. ^ a b Larone, Davise H. (2011). "Thermally Monomorphic Moulds". Medically Important Fungi: A Guide to Identification. Washington: ASM Press. p. 305. ISBN 9781555816605.
  13. ^ a b c d Sigler, Lynne (1997). "Lesser Known Fungi of Clinical Importance". In Jacobs, Paul H.; Nall, Lexie (eds.). Fungal Disease: Biology, Immunology, and Diagnosis. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 90. ISBN 978-0824794026.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac Domsch, K.H.; Gams, W.; Anderson, Traute-Heidi (1980). "Fusarium". Compendium of Soil Fungi. Vol. 28. London: Academic Press. pp. 333–337. Bibcode:1982Geode..28...63M. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(82)90042-8. ISBN 978-0122204012. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  15. ^ Watanabe, Tsuneo (2011). "Anamorphic Fungi". Pictorial Atlas of Soil and Seed Fungi (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 185. ISBN 9781439804193.
  16. ^ a b "American Phytopathological Society". American Phytopathological Society. Retrieved 2018-12-12.
  17. ^ "Fusarium solani". projects.ncsu.edu. Archived from the original on 2020-05-13. Retrieved 2018-12-12.
  18. ^ Ciegler, A.; Burmeister, H.R.; Vesonder, R.F. (1983). "Poisonous Fungi: Mycotoxins and Mycotoxicoses". In Howard, Dexter H. (ed.). Fungi Pathogenic for Humans and Animals. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 439. ISBN 978-0824711443.
  19. ^ Zhang, Ning; O'Donnell, Kerry; Sutton, Deanna A.; Nalim, F. Ameena; Summerbell, Richard C.; Padhye, Arvind A.; Geiser, David M. (June 2006). "Members of the Fusarium solani species complex that cause infections in both humans and plants are common in the environment". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 44 (6): 2186–2190. doi:10.1128/JCM.00120-06. ISSN 0095-1137. PMC 1489407. PMID 16757619.
  20. ^ Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Bennett, John E. (1992). "Infections Due to Miscellaneous Molds". Medical Mycology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. p. 746. ISBN 9780812114638.
  21. ^ Pearlman, E; Leal, S; Tarabishy, A; Sun, Y; Szczotka-Flynn, L; Imamura, Y; Mukherjee, P; Chandra, J; Momany, M; Hastings-Cowden, S; Ghannoum, M (2011). "Pathogenesis of Fungal Keratitis". In Dartt, Darlene A.; D'Amore, Patricia; Dana, Reza; Niederkorn, Jerry Y. (eds.). Immunology, Inflammation and Disease of the Eye. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 110. ISBN 9780123819741.
  22. ^ Cid, Alejandro Santos (2023-02-07). "Detenidos los tres primeros presuntos responsables del brote de meningitis en Durango". El Pais (in Mexican Spanish). Retrieved 2023-05-15.
  23. ^ "Mexico Blames Anesthesiologist for 35 Meningitis Deaths". US News. 2023-02-07.
  24. ^ Alexander Tin (2023-05-26). "U.S., Mexico ask WHO for emergency declaration over deadly fungal outbreak". CBS News. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
  25. ^ Health Alert Network (HAN) - 00492 (2023-06-01). "Important Updates on Outbreak of Fungal Meningitis in U.S. Patients Who Underwent Surgical Procedures under Epidural Anesthesia in Matamoros, Mexico". emergency.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2023-06-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ a b Strong, Nora; Meeks, Grant; Sheth, Sunil A.; McCullough, Louise; Villalba, Julian A.; Tan, Chunfeng; Barreto, Andrew; Wanger, Audrey; McDonald, Michelle; Kan, Peter; Shaltoni, Hashem; Campo Maldonado, Jose; Parada, Victoria; Hassan, Ameer E.; Reagan-Steiner, Sarah (2024-02-08). "Neurovascular Complications of Iatrogenic Fusarium solani Meningitis". New England Journal of Medicine. 390 (6): 522–529. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2308192. ISSN 0028-4793. PMC 11905984.
  27. ^ Summerell, Brett Anthony; Leslie, John F. (7 September 2011). "Fifty years of Fusarium: how could nine species have ever been enough?". Fungal Diversity. 50 (1): 135–144. doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0132-y. S2CID 45420289.
  28. ^ Wrather, J. Allen; Koenning, Steve R. (June 2006). "Estimates of Disease Effects on Soybean Yields in the United States 2003 to 2005". Journal of Nematology. 38 (2): 173–180. ISSN 0022-300X. PMC 2586459. PMID 19259444.
  29. ^ Bignell, Elaine; Rogers, Tom; Haynes, Ken (2004). "Host Recognition by Fungal Pathogens". In San-Blas, Gioconda; Calderone, Richard A. (eds.). Pathogenic Fungi: Host Interactions and Emerging Strategies for Control. Wymondham: Caister Academic Press. p. 17. ISBN 9780954246488.
  30. ^ "Fusarium Root Rot - Bugwoodwiki". wiki.bugwood.org. Retrieved 2018-12-12.
  31. ^ Tom Chiller, Dallas Smith, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner (2023-06-08). "Interim Recommendations for Diagnosing and Managing Suspected Fungal Meningitis Associated with Epidural Anesthesia Administered in Matamoros, Mexico". emergency.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2023-06-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)