Lepyrodontopsis
| Lepyrodontopsis | |
|---|---|
| The macroscopic habit of Lepyrodontopsis trichophylla as seen under a dissecting microscope | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Plantae |
| Division: | Bryophyta |
| Class: | Bryopsida |
| Subclass: | Bryidae |
| Order: | Hypnales |
| Family: | Meteoriaceae (?) |
| Genus: | Lepyrodontopsis Broth. |
Lepyrodontopsis is a monospecific genus of disputed taxonomy. It has been variously placed in Meteoriaceae and Brachytheciaceae, which are regarded as sister families.[1]
The only accepted species within Lepyrodontopsis is L. trichophylla. One invalid species was described and placed within Lepyrodontopsis, but the description gives no type specimen and lacks a Latin diagnosis.[2]
Morphology
Lepyrodontopsis trichophylla is a pleurocarp of moderate size with a complanate habit. Its leaves have linear cells characteristic of Hypnales and lack cellular ornamentation. It lacks a costa and has serrate to serrulate margins. The major diagnostic characteristic of Lepyrodontopsis is longitudinal furrows, particularly obvious when the leaves are dry.[3] Its exostome resembles that of several families once included in Neckeraceae.[4]
Distribution
Lepyrodontopsis is limited to the Neotropics. It has been recorded in the Tropical Andes,[5] the Dominican Republic,[6] the elfin woodland of Jamaica and Puerto Rico,[7][8][9] Montserrat,[10] and other West Indian islands. In moist environments of the West Indies, it is both widespread and frequently dominant among epiphytic communities, but its range outside of the Antilles is limited.[11]
Habit
Lepyrodontopsis grows in moist forests between 350 and 2000 meters of elevation, typically epiphytically, though occasionally also on rocks.[11]
Disputed taxonomy
At the time that it was described in 1924, Lepyrodontopsis was placed within Brachytheciaceae. In Pleurocarpous Mosses of the West Indies, W. R. Buck placed it in Meteoriaceae, despite in 1981 proposing a new family—Lepyrodontopsidaceae—because Lepyrodontopsis is phylogenetically isolated due to its strange morphology.[11][4] It is abnormal among the ecostate hypnoids due to its deeply plicate leaves. Nor does it fit within the costate hypnoids, as it lacks that characteristic structure. Phylogenetically, Buck placed it near Meteoriaceae, and in 1986, he placed Lepyrodontopsidaceae in the proposed super-family of Meteoriacanae.[12] Following Buck's lead, Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America likewise places Lepyrodontopsis in Meteoriaceae, though it remarks on the need for further phylogenetic research to understand its placement within the order.[13] In 2010, Bruce H. Allen placed Lepyrodontopsis within Lembophyllaceae on the basis of both morphology and molecular analyses published in 2004, which determined that Lepyrodontopsis was basal to the Lembophyllaceae-Neckeraceae clade.[14][15]
Phylogeny
A molecular analysis of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) and nuclear ribosomal transcription unit (nrDNA) published in 2004 resolved three major families within the hypnoid mosses: Meteoriaceae, Lembophyllaceae, and Brachytheciaceae, all of which were found to be more or less monophyletic. Among the phylogeny produced by this paper, Lepyrodontopsis was placed in an isolated, basal position of the Lembophyllaceae-Neckeraceae clade.[15] A subsequent phylogenetic work on the Hypnales published in 2009 found that many of the families were polyphyletic.[16] The phylogenetic relationships of the Hypnales, and the position of Lepyrodontopsis within them, remains unresolved.
Invalid taxa
Of the two species described within Lepyrodontopsis, one is invalid. This is L. indica or L. indicum (it is variably conjugated), which was first described in 2010 by Dubagunta Subramanian.[17] However, L. indicum was one of 148 invalid names proposed by Subramanian, all of which did not adhere to articles 39 and/or 40 of the Shenzhen Code: the inclusion of a Latin diagnosis and specific citations of a type specimen and where that specimen is accessioned, respectively.[18]
References
- ^ Engler, Adolf; Prantl, Karl; Brotherus, Viktor Ferdinand (1924). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigsten Arten, insbesondere den Nutzpflanzen (2 ed.). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. p. 358.
- ^ "Lepyrodontopsis indica". Tropicos. Missouri Botanic Garden. Retrieved 15 December 2025.
- ^ "Lepyrodontopsis trichophylla (Sw. ex Hedw.) Broth". World Flora Online. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ a b Buck, William R. (1981). "The Taxonomy of Eriodon and Notes on Other South American Genera of Brachytheciaceae with Erect Capsules". Brittonia. 33 (4): 556–563. doi:10.2307/2806764. Retrieved 15 December 2025.
- ^ Churchill, Steven (September 2009). "Moss Diversity and Endemism of the Tropical Andes". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 96 (3): 449. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ Jesús, Inés Sastre-De; Pérez, Mervin Pérez; Marin, Angel Motito (December 2010). "MOSSES OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: SPECIES CATALOGUE, ELEVATION DISTRIBUTION AND FLORISTIC AFFINITIES". Harvard Papers in Botany. 15 (2): 433. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ Asprey, G. F.; Robbins, R. G. (October 1953). "The Vegetation of Jamaica". Ecological Monographs. 23 (4): 402. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ Welch, W. H.; Crum, H. (1959). "A Contribution to the Jamaican Moss Flora". The Bryologist. 62 (3): 175–176. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ Russell, Keith W.; Miller, H. A. (January 1977). "THE ECOLOGY OF AN ELFIN FOREST IN PUERTO RICO, 17. EPIPHYTIC MOSSY VEGETATION OF PICO DEL OESTE". Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 58 (1): 14. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ "Specimen List - The William & Lynda Steere Herbarium". C. V. Starr Virtual Herbarium. New York Botanical Garden. Archived from the original on December 17, 2025. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
- ^ a b c Buck, William R. (1998). Pleurocarpous Mosses of the West Indies. Bronx, New York: Memoirs of the New York Botanic Garden. pp. 260–261. ISBN 0-89327-418-6.
- ^ Buck, William R.; Vitt, Dale H. (1986). "Suggestions for a New Familial Classification of Pleurocarpous Mosses". Taxon. 35 (1): 21–60. doi:10.2307/1221034. Retrieved 15 December 2025.
- ^ Churchill, Steven P.; Gradstein, Stephan Robbert; Salazar Allen, Noris (2001). Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden Press. ISBN 978-0-89327-435-1.
- ^ Allen, Bruce; Pursell, Ronald; Ireland, Robert (10 September 2010). "Moss Flora of Central America Part 3. Anomodontaceae-Symphyodontaceae". Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. 117. St. Louis, Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden. ISSN 0161-1542.
- ^ a b Quandt, Dietmar; Huttunen, Sanna (January 2004). "Evolution of pendent life-forms in bryophytes". The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 95: 207–217. doi:10.18968/jhbl.95.0_207. Retrieved 23 February 2026.
- ^ Olsson, Sanna; Buchbender, Volker; Enroth, Johannes; Hedenäs, Lars; Huttunen, Sanna; Quandt, Dietmar (September 2009). "Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades". The Bryologist. 112 (3): 447–466. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-112.3.447. Retrieved 23 February 2026.
- ^ Subramanian, Dubagunta (2010). "Studies in mosses from South India". Plant Archives. 10 (1): 269–273.
- ^ Majumdar, Shuvadeep (November 2021). "Notes on some invalid moss taxa". The Bryological Times. 153: 5–9. Retrieved 22 February 2026.