Generalized Poincaré conjecture
In the mathematical area of topology, the generalized Poincaré conjecture is a statement that a manifold that is a homotopy sphere is a sphere. More precisely, one fixes a category of manifolds: topological (Top), piecewise linear (PL), or differentiable (Diff). Then the statement is
- Every homotopy sphere (a closed n-manifold which is homotopy equivalent to the n-sphere) in the chosen category (i.e. topological manifolds, PL manifolds, or smooth manifolds) is isomorphic in the chosen category (i.e. homeomorphic, PL-isomorphic, or diffeomorphic) to the standard n-sphere.
The name derives from the Poincaré conjecture, which was made for (topological or PL) manifolds of dimension 3, where being a homotopy sphere is equivalent to being simply connected and closed. The generalized Poincaré conjecture is known to be true or false in a number of instances, due to the work of many distinguished topologists, including the Fields Medal awardees John Milnor, Steve Smale, Michael Freedman, and Grigori Perelman.
Status
Here is a summary of the status of the generalized Poincaré conjecture in various settings.
- Top: True in all dimensions.
- PL: True in dimensions other than 4; unknown in dimension 4, where it is equivalent to Diff.
- Diff: False generally, with the first known counterexample in dimension 7. True in some dimensions including 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 56 and 61. This list includes all odd dimensions for which the conjecture is true. For even dimensions, it is true only for those on the list, possibly dimension 4, and possibly some additional dimensions (though it is conjectured that there are none such).[1] The case of dimension 4 is equivalent to PL.
Thus the veracity of the Poincaré conjectures is different in each category Top, PL, and Diff. In general, the notion of isomorphism differs among the categories, but it is the same in dimension 3 and below. In dimension 4, PL and Diff agree, but Top differs. In dimensions above 6 they all differ. In dimensions 5 and 6 every PL manifold admits an infinitely differentiable structure that is so-called Whitehead compatible.[2]
History
The cases n = 1 and 2 have long been known by the classification of manifolds in those dimensions.
For a PL or smooth homotopy n-sphere, in 1960 Stephen Smale proved for that it was homeomorphic to the n-sphere and subsequently extended his proof to ;[3] he received a Fields Medal for his work in 1966. Shortly after Smale's announcement of a proof, John Stallings gave a different proof for dimensions at least 7 that a PL homotopy n-sphere was homeomorphic to the n-sphere, using the notion of "engulfing".[4] E. C. Zeeman modified Stalling's construction to work in dimensions 5 and 6.[5] In 1962, Smale proved that a PL homotopy n-sphere is PL-isomorphic to the standard PL n-sphere for n at least 5.[6] In 1966, M. H. A. Newman extended PL engulfing to the topological situation and proved that for a topological homotopy n-sphere is homeomorphic to the n-sphere.[7]
Michael Freedman solved the topological case in 1982 and received a Fields Medal in 1986.[8] The initial proof consisted of a 50-page outline, with many details missing. Freedman gave a series of lectures at the time, convincing experts that the proof was correct. A project to produce a written version of the proof with background and all details filled in began in 2013, with Freedman's support. The project's output, edited by Stefan Behrens, Boldizsar Kalmar, Min Hoon Kim, Mark Powell, and Arunima Ray, with contributions from 20 mathematicians, was published in August 2021 in the form of a 496-page book, The Disc Embedding Theorem.[9][10]
Grigori Perelman solved the case (where the topological, PL, and differentiable cases all coincide) in 2003 in a sequence of three papers.[11][12][13] He was offered a Fields Medal in August 2006 and the Millennium Prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute in March 2010, but declined both.
John Milnor solved the smooth case in 1959 in the unpublished manuscript "Differentiable Manifolds Which Are Homotopy Spheres." The results of this manuscript were later incorporated in a larger and later (1963) paper where the smooth cases and were also solved. [14]
Daniel Isaksen solved the smooth case in 2014. This followed from his calculation of the stable homotopy group in dimension 56 being of order 2 (See page 4 in section 1.4 and Charts 8.1 and 8.17 in Stable Stems (2019) by Daniel C. Isaksen) [15]. Since the image of the J-Homomorphism in the Kervaire-Milnor sequence is also of order 2, this shows that the cokernel of the J-homomorphism is trival, and so the number of smooth structures on is one. Also, see Theorem 3.1.14 of Zhouli Xu's 2017 PhD thesis "In And Around Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres." See also section 2 in the review article Stable Homotopy Groups Of Spheres and Motivic Homotopy Theory (2023) by Daniel C. Isaksen, Guozhen Wang, and Zhouli Xu [16].
Guozhen Wang and Zhouli Xu solved the smooth case in 2017 [17].
It was known from a theorem of Kervaire and Milnor (See Groups of Homotopy Spheres I (1963)) that the Smooth Poincare conjecture is always false for dimesnions . For dimensions the answer depends on the existence of Kervaire invariant elements. Due to work of Hill, Hopkins and Ravenel [18], it was thus known that the only odd dimensions where the smooth Poincare conjecture could be true were in dimensions 1, 3, 5, 13, 29, 61, and 125. J. Peter May ruled out the case of [19]. The case was ruled out in the 1970's by filling in the terms in the short exact sequence . J. Peter May showed in his PhD thesis that the only odd prime primary term in , namely , is equal to . Mark Mahowald and Martin Tangora then showed that the 2-primary term was trivial [20]. This established that the stable homotopy group in dimension 29 is of order 3. William Browder showed that by establishing the existence of a framed manifold of Kervaire invariant 1 in dimension 30 [21]. Because the image of the J-homomorphism is trivial in dimension 29, the conclusion is that and therefore there are three different smooth structures on . Daniel Isaksen developed a more efficient and machine checkable method, namely motivic homotopy theory, that allowed calculations beyond . The final case was finally ruled out by Guozhen Wang and Zhouli Xu by producing an explicit element of whose non-triviality is detected by the spectrum of topological modular forms (See Proposition 1.12 of their 2017 paper, "The Triviality of the 61-Stem in the Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres"). Thus, it is now known that the only odd dimensions where the smooth Poincare conjecture is true are 1, 3, 5, and 61.
Exotic spheres
As the topological Poincaré conjecture holds in all dimensions, in those dimensions where the smooth Poincaré conjecture fails there must exist exotic spheres, that is manifolds that are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic to the standard sphere. In other words, they correspond to non-standard smooth structures on the standard (topological) sphere.
For example, the homotopy spheres that John Milnor produced are homeomorphic (in fact piecewise linear homeomorphic) to the standard sphere , but are not diffeomorphic to it, and are exotic spheres.
Michel Kervaire and Milnor showed that the oriented 7-sphere has 28 different smooth structures (or 15 ignoring orientations), and in higher dimensions there are usually many different smooth structures on a sphere.[22] It is suspected that certain differentiable structures on the 4-sphere, called Gluck twists, are not isomorphic to the standard one, but at the moment there are no known topological invariants capable of distinguishing different smooth structures on a 4-sphere.[23]
PL
For piecewise linear manifolds, the Poincaré conjecture is true except possibly in dimension 4, where the answer is unknown, and equivalent to the smooth case. In other words, every compact PL manifold of dimension not equal to 4 that is homotopy equivalent to a sphere is PL isomorphic to a sphere.[2]
See also
References
- ^ Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2017). "The triviality of the 61-stem in the stable homotopy groups of spheres". Ann. Math. Second series. 186 (2): 501–580. arXiv:1601.02184. doi:10.4007/annals.2017.186.2.3. Zbl 1376.55013. See Corollaries 1.13 and 1.15 and Conjecture 1.17.
- ^ a b See Buoncristiano, Sandro (2003). "Fragments of Geometric Topology from the Sixties" (PDF). Geometry & Topology Monographs. 6.
- ^ Smale, Stephen (1961). "Generalized Poincaré's conjecture in dimensions greater than four". Ann. Math. Second series. 74 (2): 391–406. doi:10.2307/1970239. JSTOR 1970239. MR 0137124.
- ^ Stallings, John (1960). "Polyhedral homotopy spheres". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 66 (6): 485–488. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10511-3.
- ^ Zeeman, Erik Christopher (1962). "The Poincaré conjecture for n greater than or equal to 5". Topology of 3-manifolds and Related Topics (Proc. The Univ. Of Georgia Institute, 1961). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall: 198–204. MR 0140113.
- ^ Smale, Stephen (1962). "On the structure of manifolds". Amer. J. Math. 84 (3): 387–399. doi:10.2307/2372978. JSTOR 2372978. MR 0153022.
- ^ Newman, M. H. A. (1966). "The Engulfing Theorem for Topological Manifolds". Annals of Mathematics. (2). 84 (3): 555–571. doi:10.2307/1970460. JSTOR 1970460. MR 0203708.
- ^ Freedman, Michael (1982). "The topology of four-dimensional manifolds". Journal of Differential Geometry. 17 (3): 357–453. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214437136. MR 0679066.
- ^ Hartnett, Kevin (September 9, 2021). "New Math Book Rescues Landmark Topology Proof". Quanta Magazine.
- ^ The Disc Embedding Theorem
- ^ Perelman, Grigori (11 November 2002). "The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications". arXiv:math.DG/0211159.
- ^ Perelman, Grigori (10 March 2003). "Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds". arXiv:math.DG/0303109.
- ^ Perelman, Grigori (17 July 2003). "Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds". arXiv:math.DG/0307245.
- ^ Kervaire, Michel; Milnor, John (1963). "Groups of Homotopy Spheres I". Ann. Math. Second series. 186 (2): 504–537.
- ^ Isaksen, Daniel (2019). Stable Stems. Memoirs of the AMS. Vol. 262, No 1269. American Mathematical Society. doi:10.1090/memo/1269. ISSN 0065-9266.
- ^ Isaksen, Daniel; Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2023). "Stable Homotopy Groups Of Spheres and Motivic Homotopy Theory". In Beliaev, Dmitry; Smirnov, Stanislav (eds.). International Congress of Mathematicians 2022 July 6-14. Vol. IV. EMS Press. pp. 2768–2790. doi:10.4171/ICM2022/32.
- ^ Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2017). "The triviality of the 61-stem in the stable homotopy groups of spheres". Ann. Math. Second series. 186 (2): 501–580. arXiv:1601.02184. doi:10.4007/annals.2017.186.2.3. Zbl 1376.55013.
- ^ Hill, M. A.; Hopkins, M. J.; Ravenel, D. C. (2016). "On the nonexistence of elements of Kervaire invariant one". Annals of Mathematics. 184: 1–262. doi:10.4007/annals.2016.184.1.1.
- ^ May, J. Peter (1964). The Cohomology of Restricted Lie Algebras and of Hopf Algebras: Application to the Steenrod Algebra (PhD thesis).
- ^ Mahowald, Mark; Tangora, Martin (1967). "Some Differentials In The Adams Spectral Sequence". Topology. 6: 349–369. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(67)90023-7.
- ^ Browder, William (1969). "The Kervaire invariant of framed manifolds and its generalization". Annals of Mathematics. 90: 157–186. doi:10.2307/1970686.
- ^ Kervaire, Michel A.; Milnor, John W. (1963). "Groups of homotopy spheres: I". Annals of Mathematics. 2nd Ser. 77 (3): 504–537. doi:10.2307/1970128. JSTOR 1970128. MR 0148075. This paper calculates the structure of the group of smooth structures on an n-sphere for .
- ^ Gluck, Herman (1962). "The Embedding of Two-Spheres in the Four-Sphere". Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (2): 308–333. doi:10.2307/1993581. JSTOR 1993581.