Energy superpower

An energy superpower is a country that supplies large amounts of energy resources (crude oil, natural gas, coal, etc.) to a significant number of other countries - and therefore has the potential to influence world markets for political or economic gains. Energy superpower status might be exercised, for example, by significantly influencing the price on global markets or by withholding supplies. The term "energy superpower" or "renewable energy superpower" is also used to characterize nations at the forefront of energy transition and the development of renewable energy resources (solar, wind, hydro) and technologies.[1][2][3]

The term "energy superpower" lacks a precise scholarly definition and is primarily a political term. It is not a concept rooted in rigorous academic or scientific categorization but rather a label used in political discourse to describe countries that wield significant influence in the global energy landscape. This term is subject to interpretation;and can be applied differently by individuals and organizations - depending on their specific agenda or perspectives. As a result, the meaning and applicability of the term "energy superpower" may vary.

As of 2024, the United States is the world's leading producer of total energy, leading producer of petroleum, leading producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), and leading exporter of LNG.[4][5]

Russia is widely recognized as an energy superpower.[6][7][8]Other nations that have, at different points in time, earned this designation include Saudi Arabia,[9] Canada,[10] Venezuela,[10] and Iran.,[11][12] German Empire.

Countries referred to as energy superpowers

See also: Petrostate, Resource curse, and Oil reserves

Russia

The discourses surrounding Russia's energy wealth play a crucial role in Vladimir Putin's attempts to restore Russia's great power status. Some scholars have noted that, although Putin may avoid explicitly using the term "superpower," the idea of Russia as an energy superpower is an integral part of the ideology developed by his regime.[13][14][15] This idea emphasizes Russia's significant role in the global energy landscape and frames it as a key player in international politics. However, Russia's status of an energy superpower and the strategic implications it carries have been called into question by many experts. As Vladimir Milov, of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, says:

The "energy superpower" concept is an illusion with no basis in reality. Perhaps most dangerously, it doesn’t recognize the mutual dependence between Russia and energy consumers. Because of political conflicts and declining production, future supply disruptions to Europe are likely. As a result, European gas companies may likely someday demand elimination of the take-or-pay conditions in their Russian contracts. This would threaten Gazprom’s ability to borrow. Putin’s attempt to use energy to increase Russian influence could backfire in the long run.[16]

Vladimir Mau, Aleksei Kudrin, German Gref, and many other Russian economists compare Russia's dependence on energy exports with a severe drug addiction and even use the “sitting on the oil needle” metaphor to describe Russia's economic development in the 2000s and the 2010s.[13]

Canada

In the mid-2010s, former Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, asserted that Canada should be considered an energy superpower. By advertising Canada as an oil supplier on the international level, Harper defined it as a “reliable producer in a volatile unpredictable world” who can offer its oil-thirsty partners “a transparent regulatory system and a commitment to open markets”.[17] This viewpoint found support among conservative political activists and public intellectuals, such as Ezra Levant, the author of Ethical Oil (2011). However, scholars,[18][19][20][21] Indigenous peoples' organisations and activists,[22] and environmental activists, including such prominent Canadian environmentalists as Andrew Nikiforuk[23] and David Suzuki,[24][25] contested representations of Canada as an energy superpower. These critics raised concerns about the environmental footprint of Canada's oil sands (e.g., tailing ponds, air pollution and deforestation) in the context of climate change, as well as socio-economic factors such as the potential repercussions on local communities, the equitable distribution of economic benefits, and the overall social implications of prioritizing the oil industry.

In 2025, the current Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, reasserted Canada's position as an "energy superpower" and the need for Canada to develop its production capacity in "clean and conventional energy sources"[26], as well as overseas export capacity. This marks a break in posture from the previous Trudeau administration (2015-2025), which Trudeau once characterized as wanting Canada to be known globally "not for its resources, but for its resourcefulness." [27] The posture of Carney's administration is viewed as a way to attract investment into Canada's economy, and reduce dependence on the United States in response to United States' tariffs during the second Trump administration. Energy projects under construction in Canada include doubling the production capacity of Canada's largest LNG export terminal in Kitimat[28], and a recently announced memorandum of understanding between the province of Alberta and the Federal Government of Canada laying the conditions for a new oil pipeline to be built between Alberta and the west coast of British Columbia.[29]

Iran

Iran is widely regarded as an energy superpower due to its immense natural resources, including some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, estimated at 157 billion barrels, and the second-largest reserves of natural gas. Its South Pars gas field, one of the largest in the world, underscores the country’s pivotal role in global energy markets. Despite facing sanctions Iran’s energy infrastructure remains robust, and the country has significant potential to boost oil and gas production and exports. With its strategic location in the Middle East, Iran is well-positioned to become a key energy player, not just regionally but globally, offering a vital supply of energy to neighboring countries and beyond.[30][31][32][33]

Venezuela

In the 2000s, Venezuela was widely described as a new energy superpower. For example, Manik Talwani, a geophysicist at Rice University, argued in 2007 that Venezuela will likely to join Saudi Arabia in attaining the status of energy superpower.[10] Citing its enormous potential reserves (1.2 trillion potential barrels), Talwani claimed that Venezuela will become an energy superpower in the next few decades as oil production declines elsewhere. However, Venezuela's descent into economic and political chaos has become a cautionary tale about the complexities of managing resource wealth in developing countries. The country's situation serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and potential pitfalls associated with overreliance on natural resources, particularly oil, for economic development.[34][35]

Saudi Arabia

As a leading producer and exporter of crude oil, Saudi Arabia has substantial influence over the global oil market and has been labeled as an energy superpower. The country has the capacity to produce and export significant volumes of crude oil, making it a linchpin in the global oil supply chain. Saudi Arabia is a founding member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental organization that plays a central role in setting oil production and pricing policies. As a leading OPEC member, Saudi Arabia has the ability to influence oil production quotas, which directly affects global oil prices.

Types

Over time, as energy systems change, different academic and critical fields describe different kinds of energy super power based on the form of energy generation.

Electricity

This section is an excerpt from Electrostate.[edit]

An electrostate is a polity that uses electricity as the primary source of energy for its economy, rather than fossil fuels. It commands renewable energy supply chains for critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earths, develops renewable technologies such as solar, batteries, and electric vehicles, and supports the widespread deployment of these technologies.[36][37] As a neologism, the exact definition is still under debate, with some sources distinguishing between producer electrostates and consumer electrostates.[38]

China is widely identified as the first electrostate, both producing and consuming vast amounts of renewable technologies and energy, dominating clean-tech manufacturing and critical mineral value chains, and engaged in rapid demostic electrification, effectively replacing the "petrostate" model with an electron-driven geopolitical, financial, and industrial economy.[39][40][41][42][43][44]

Other nations are also laying the foundations for electrostate status through green energy transition and expansion, by importing renewable technologies for deployment or attempting to build up manufacturing capacity themselves.[38][45]

Developing countries could increase their rates of electrification and clean energy adoption more quickly than developed economies because they have access to cheaper renewable technologies that were not previously available, effectively allowing them to bypass the intensive coal and oil-based stage of development while growing their economies.[38][46][45]

Countries may transition to an electrostate model for reasons such as environmental protection, additional energy capacity, economic benefits, better energy efficiency, energy security, reduction in imported energy cost, and energy independence, to avoid negative impacts from fossil fuel markets or geopolitical pressure from fossil fuel producers.[47][48] The proliferation of electrotech also has economic and geopolitical impact. It could weaken petrostates' trading power and their global influence. As the world becomes increasingly electrified, electrostates will be embedded within national economies across markets, especially developing countries, offering an alternative while reducing the leverage that petrostates have over the global energy structure.[49][50][51]

Petroleum

This section is an excerpt from Petrostate.[edit]

A petrostate, oil state or petrocracy is a polity whose economy is heavily dependent on the extraction and export of oil or natural gas. Petrostates are conventionally independent nations; however writers like Samuel Weston and Andrew Nikiforuk describe major oil-producing subnational entities like Wyoming,[52] Alberta and Louisiana as also petrostates.[53] A petromonarchy or oil monarchy is a petrostate run by a dynastic absolute monarch;[54] one run by another type of autocrat is a petro-dictatorship.[55]

The presence alone of large oil and gas industries does not define a petrostate: major oil producers that also have diversified economies are not classified as petrostates due to their ability to generate income from various industries and sectors beyond the oil industry.[56] Petrostates typically have highly concentrated political and economic power, resting in the hands of an elite, as well as unaccountable political institutions that are susceptible to corruption.[57]

Renewable energy

The geopolitical impact of the growing use of renewable energy is a subject of ongoing debate and research.[58] Many countries wealthy in oil, such as Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Norway, and are able to exert diplomatic or geopolitical influence as a result of their oil. Most of these countries are expected to be among the geopolitical "losers" of the energy transition, although some, like Norway, are also significant producers and exporters of renewable energy. Fossil fuels and the infrastructure to extract them may, in the long term, become stranded assets.[59]

Conversely, nations abundant in renewable resources and the minerals required for renewable technology are expected to gain influence.[60][61] In particular, China has become the world's dominant manufacturer of the technology needed to produce or store renewable energy, especially solar panels, wind turbines, and lithium-ion batteries.[62] Nations rich in solar and wind energy could become major energy exporters.[63][64][63][65] Countries with large uninhabited areas such as Australia, China, and many African and Middle Eastern countries have a potential for huge installations of renewable energy. The production of renewable energy technologies requires new supply chains. And countries with robust renewable energy industry can offset the geopolitical and economic leverage exerted by traditional fossil-fuel countries.[66]

China is called a 'clean energy superpower' due to the country's long-term strategy and investment in renewable energy.[67][68][69] China curbs its reliance on foreign energy by expanding domestic solar, wind, and nuclear energy supply, making the country's economy more resilient against oil supply outages and price hikes. In 2025, the country accounts for 80% of solar panel manufacturing capacity and 60% wind turbine production in the world.[70] The decades-long investment also ensured China's leadership position in the climate politics,[71][72] renewable energy supply chains, and relevant industries such as the automobiles.[73][74][75][76]

In 2024, the United Kingdom government outlined national strategic plans to become a 'clean energy superpower', being a global leader in renewable technologies by 2030. It involves massive investment in domestic renewables like offshore wind, solar, and nuclear power to lower household bills, create high-skilled jobs, and transition away from volatile fossil fuel markets.[77]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Jericho, Greg (19 Oct 2023). "Australia is already an energy superpower. We should be using that to drive the world towards renewables". The Guardian.
  2. ^ Araya, Daniel (November 27, 2018). "China's Belt and Road Initiative is poised to transform the clean energy industry". The Brookings Institution.
  3. ^ Butler, Nick (September 21, 2014). "China: the world's energy superpower". Financial Times.
  4. ^ Williams, Curtis (January 3, 2024). "US was top LNG exporter in 2023 as hit record levels". Reuters.
  5. ^ Sharma, Gaurav. "As 2024 Approaches U.S. Leads Global Crude Oil Production". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-02-08.
  6. ^ "'Russia Won't Act Like an Energy Superpower': Making Promises that Can't Be Kept". Global Events Magazine. 2006-09-15. Archived from the original on 2008-08-28. Retrieved 2012-02-05.
  7. ^ "The Future of Russia as an Energy Superpower". Harvard University Press. 20 November 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  8. ^ "How Russia's energy superpower status can bring supersecurity and superstability. Interview with Leonid Grigoriev". Civil G8. 2006. Retrieved 2012-02-05.
  9. ^ "Saudi Arabia's first step towards clean energy technologies". UNDP. Archived from the original on 2012-05-28. Retrieved 2012-02-05.
  10. ^ a b c Canada: The next oil superpower? Archived 2007-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, by Manik Talwani. The New York Times 2003
  11. ^ "Energy and the Iranian economy: hearing". DIANE. United States Congress. 2006-07-25. ISBN 9781422320945. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
  12. ^ Balamir Coşkun, Bezen (Winter 2009). "Global Energy Geopolitics and Iran" (PDF). Uluslararası İlişkiler. 5 (20). International Relations Council of Turkey: 179–201. Archived from the original on April 1, 2014.
  13. ^ a b Kuteleva, Anna (2020). "Discursive Politics of Energy in EU–Russia Relations: Russia as an "Energy Superpower" and a "Raw-Material Appendage"". Problems of Post-Communism. 67 (1): 78–92. doi:10.1080/10758216.2018.1520601. S2CID 158115925.
  14. ^ Baev, Pavel (2007). "Russia Aspires to the Status of 'Energy Superpower'". Strategic Analysis. 31 (3): 447–465. doi:10.1080/09700160701415735. S2CID 154245608.
  15. ^ Bouzarovski, Stefan; Bassin, Mark (2011). "Energy and Identity: Imagining Russia as a Hydrocarbon Superpower". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 101 (4): 783–794. Bibcode:2011AAAG..101..783B. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.567942. S2CID 143061534.
  16. ^ "How Sustainable is Russia's Future as an Energy Superpower?". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on January 9, 2007. Retrieved 2012-02-07.
  17. ^ Harper, Stephen. Address by the Prime Minister at the Canada-UK Chamber of Commerce. London, UK, 2006, July 14.
  18. ^ Kuteleva, Anna; Leifso, Justin (2020). "Contested crude: Multiscalar identities, conflicting discourses, and narratives of oil production in Canada". Energy Research & Social Science. 70 101672. Bibcode:2020ERSS...7001672K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101672. S2CID 224926983.
  19. ^ Adkin, Laurie (2017). "Crossroads in Alberta: climate capitalism or ecological democracy". Socialist Studies/Études Socialistes. 12 (1): 2–31. doi:10.18740/S4BP7H.
  20. ^ Laxer, Gordon (2015). After the Sands: Energy and Ecological Security for Canadians. D&M Publishers. ISBN 9781771621007.
  21. ^ Spiegel, Samuel J. (2021). "Fossil fuel violence and visual practices on Indigenous land: Watching, witnessing and resisting settler-colonial injustices". Energy Research & Social Science. 79 102189. Bibcode:2021ERSS...7902189S. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102189. hdl:20.500.11820/9b5ef9c3-31e7-4a8f-8216-2648da198788.
  22. ^ Preston, Jen (2013). "Neoliberal settler colonialism, Canada and the tar sands". Race & Class. 55 (2): 42–59. doi:10.1177/0306396813497877. S2CID 145726008.
  23. ^ Nikiforuk, Andrew (2009). Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent. Vancouver: Greystone Books Ltd. ISBN 9781553655558.
  24. ^ "Consider a national energy plan for Canada". SaskToday.ca. 2010-09-29. Retrieved 2023-11-17.
  25. ^ "Does Selling off Our Resources Make Us an Energy Superpower?". HuffPost. 2013-03-27. Retrieved 2023-11-17.
  26. ^ "Mark Carney's Liberals to make Canada the world's leading energy superpower" (PDF). liberal.ca. Liberal Party of Canada. Retrieved 30 November 2025.
  27. ^ Trudeau, Justin (20 January 2016). "Address by the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada". Prime Minister of Canada. Retrieved 30 November 2025.
  28. ^ "Projects referred to the MPO". Major Projects Office. Privy Council Office. 11 September 2025. Retrieved 30 November 2025.
  29. ^ "Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding". Prime Minister of Canada. 27 November 2025. Retrieved 30 November 2025.
  30. ^ "OPEC : Iran". www.opec.org. Retrieved 2024-11-28.
  31. ^ Bermudez, Krystal (2024-10-21). "Biden Administration Admits Iran's Oil Exports Have Grown Exponentially in Value and Volume". FDD. Retrieved 2024-11-28.
  32. ^ "Iran - Countries & Regions". IEA. Retrieved 2024-11-28.
  33. ^ EPIC (2015-11-03). "Energy superpower Iran will be a global game-changer". Friends of Europe. Retrieved 2024-11-28.
  34. ^ Cheatham, Amelia; Roy, Diana; Cara Labrador, Rocio (March 10, 2023). "Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  35. ^ Bull, Benedicte; Rosales, Antulio (2020). "The crisis in Venezuela: Drivers, transitions, and pathways". European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. 109 (109): 1–20. doi:10.32992/erlacs.10587. hdl:10852/84388.
  36. ^ Tauschinski, Jana; Stylianou, Nassos (20 May 2025). "How we made it: will China be the first electrostate?". Financial Times.
  37. ^ Shafiabady, Niusha; Qi, Xiaoying (24 September 2025). "Goodbye petrostates, hello 'electrostates': how the clean energy shift is reshaping the world order". The Conversation.
  38. ^ a b c Gordon, Noah; Mangalmurti, Daevan (16 September 2025). "How to Be an "Electrostate"". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  39. ^ Singh, Inayat (9 December 2025). "The rise of the electrostate: By dominating clean energy, China is leading on climate action". CBC News.
  40. ^ Lauder, Jo (12 August 2025). "Why China is becoming the world's first electrostate". ABC News.
  41. ^ Snow, Jackie (25 August 2025). "The world's first electrostate is emerging". Quartz.
  42. ^ Huang, Francoise; Dejean, Guillaume; Hoffmann, Patrick (29 October 2025). "The electro-state era: From Made in China to Powered, Designed and Financed by China?". Allianz Trade.
  43. ^ Boner, Roman; Polidori, Daniele (16 March 2026). "China: In pole position to be the globe's first electrostate". Robeco.
  44. ^ Bromfield, Louis (October 2025). "The emerging era of electrostates". Foresight Group.
  45. ^ a b Bond, Kingsmill; Walter, Daan; Butler-Sloss, Sam (16 September 2025). "The Electrotech Revolution". Ember.
  46. ^ Rathi, Akshat; K Sullivan, Brian (22 January 2026). "India Is Further Along the Electrostate Curve Than China Was". Bloomberg News.
  47. ^ Morgan, Jennifer (6 January 2026). "The battle over a global energy transition is on between petro‑states and electro‑states – here's what to watch for in 2026". The Conversation.
  48. ^ Butler-Sloss, Sam; Walter, Daan (22 October 2025). "What is electrotech and what will it mean for geopolitics and energy security?". World Economic Forum.
  49. ^ Douglas, Bruce; Bond, Kingsmill (11 November 2025). "The end of the petrostate; how electrotech is reshaping the global power balance". Sustainable Views.
  50. ^ Rawlings, William (19 May 2025). "The Rise of Energy Dynamism: Electrostates vs Petrostates". St. Antony's International Review.
  51. ^ White, Edward (10 October 2025). "The 'profound' global impact of China's rise as an electrostate". Financial Times.
  52. ^ Western, Samuel (October 27, 2008). "The Wyoming Petrocracy: State's Biggest Strength Also Vulnerability". WYOFILE. Newspack.
  53. ^ Nikiforuk, Andrew (2010). Tar sands: dirty oil and the future of a continent. Vancouver: Greystone Books. pp. 25, 108, 173–182, 194–195, 210. ISBN 978-1-55365-555-8.
  54. ^ Bourgey, André (1990). "Les minorités et l'organisation de l'espace de l'Orient arabe". Cahiers de la Méditerranée (in French). 41: 183–204.
  55. ^ Treisman, Daniel (2020). "Economic Development and Democracy: Predispositions and Triggers". Annual Review of Political Science. 23: 241–257. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-043546.
  56. ^ Ashford, Emma (7 October 2015). "Petrostates in a Changing World". Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  57. ^ Cara Labrador, Rocio (24 January 2019). "Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  58. ^ "The Geopolitics of Renewable Energy". ResearchGate. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  59. ^ Overland, Indra; Bazilian, Morgan; Ilimbek Uulu, Talgat; Vakulchuk, Roman; Westphal, Kirsten (2019). "The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition". Energy Strategy Reviews. 26 100406. Bibcode:2019EneSR..2600406O. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100406. hdl:11250/2634876.
  60. ^ Overland, Indra (1 March 2019). "The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths". Energy Research & Social Science. 49: 36–40. Bibcode:2019ERSS...49...36O. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018. hdl:11250/2579292. ISSN 2214-6296.
  61. ^ "The transition to clean energy will mint new commodity superpowers". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  62. ^ Shepherd, Christian (March 29, 2024). "China is all in on green tech. The U.S. and Europe fear unfair competition". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  63. ^ a b "In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?". Carbon Brief. 30 November 2020. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  64. ^ Van de Graaf, Thijs; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Westphal, Kirsten (1 December 2020). "The new oil? The geopolitics and international governance of hydrogen". Energy Research & Social Science. 70 101667. Bibcode:2020ERSS...7001667V. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101667. ISSN 2214-6296. PMC 7326412. PMID 32835007.
  65. ^ World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5°C Pathway. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. 2021. p. 24. ISBN 978-92-9260-334-2.
  66. ^ "The Geopolitics Of Renewable Energy" (PDF). Center on Global Energy Policy Columbia University SIPA / Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School. 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
  67. ^ Dudley, Dominic (11 January 2019). "China Is Set To Become The World's Renewable Energy Superpower, According To New Report". Forbes.
  68. ^ Sifton, Sam (12 November 2025). "China's Green Triumph". The New York Times.
  69. ^ "The world's renewable-energy superpower". The Economist. 3 November 2025.
  70. ^ Pouille, Jordan; Thibault, Harold (15 July 2025). "China, the energy transition superpower". Le Monde.
  71. ^ Åberg, Anna; Aylett, Chris (26 September 2025). "A new international order is forming. Will China make it 'green'?". Chatham House.
  72. ^ Spencer, Richard; Vaughan, Adam (25 September 2025). "China declares itself global climate leader". The Times.
  73. ^ Watts, Jonathan (7 September 2025). "'There is only one player': why China is becoming a world leader in green energy". The Guardian.
  74. ^ Bicker, Laura (18 February 2026). "As Trump retreats from climate goals, China is becoming a green superpower". BBC News.
  75. ^ Stevenson, Alexandra; Zhao, Murphy (14 March 2026). "China's Edge in an Oil Shock: Electric Cars and Renewables". The New York Times.
  76. ^ Lauder, Jo (12 August 2025). "Why China is becoming the world's first electrostate". ABC News.
  77. ^ Evans, Simon; Lempriere, Molly (13 December 2024). "Analysis: How the UK plans to reach clean power by 2030". Carbon Brief.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.