Electrical water bath stunning

Electric water bath stunning is a widely used method for attempting to make poultry unconscious prior to slaughter. Typically, birds are briefly submerged in electrically charged water while being hung upside down. Efficacy varies, but one study found 1/3rd of birds are inadequately stunned and 1/3rd are put into cardiac arrest instead of stunned.[1] The practice has received criticism from some scientists, animal welfare organizations, and animal rights groups.[2]

Electrical parameters

The specific alternating current frequency used impacts results. Higher frequencies are less effective at stunning, but low frequencies cause more muscle contractions, blood spattering, and broken bones.[3]

Lower electrical voltage shows worse stunning effectiveness but is common. For instance, halal meat production often uses lower voltage due to concerns that high voltage often results in killing poultry via electrocution instead of stunning. Lower voltage is also associated with higher rates of broken bones, broken wings, bleeding, bruising, hematomas, and carcass condemnation.[4]

The amount of current impacts effectiveness. The stated aim is to induce a seizure without inducing anything else. The lower end of current may only immobilize and still leave perception to pain and stress fully intact. The higher end of current will cause cardiac arrest and directly kill the birds.[5]

Pre-stun shocks

Some birds may receive shocks before making contact with the water. These are often regarded as painful.[6] These shocks do not stun the birds,[7] and they can make the bird's heads miss the water due to the flapping they cause.[8] Prevalence varies by slaughterhouse, but pre-stun shocks can be common. A 2014 study in Paraná, Brazil found 49% of birds experienced pre-stun shocks.[9] In 1996, the European Commission's Scientific Veterinary Committee found 80% of turkeys experienced pre-stun shocks.[10]

Controversy

Some scientists, animal welfare groups, and animal rights groups have criticized the use of the electrical water bath stunning. For instance, Mercy for Animals has called it ineffective. They point to high failure rates and research showing that the practice may just immobilize but not leave birds unconscious.[11] Four Paws has called it "extremely distressing for the birds" and an unreliable method.[12] The European Food Safety Authority has recommended alternatives be implemented and developed, but a 2012 European Commission report viewed it likely that electrical water bath stunning would remain common for economic reasons.[1][13]

References

  1. ^ a b Hindle, V.A.; Lambooij, E.; Reimert, H.G.M.; Workel, L.D.; Gerritzen, M.A. (Mar 2010). "Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens, and ducks". Poultry Science. 89 (3): 401–412. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00297.
  2. ^ Fuseini, A.; Teye, M.; Wotton, S. B.; Lines, J. A.; Knowles, T. G. (2018-07-25). "Electrical water bath stunning for Halal poultry meat production: animal welfare issues and compatibility with the Halal rules". CABI Reviews: 1–7. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR201813016. ISSN 1749-8848.
  3. ^ Girasole, M.; Marrone, R.; Anastasio, A.; Chianese, Antonio; Mercogliano, R.; Cortesi, M. L. (2016-05-01). "Effect of electrical water bath stunning on physical reflexes of broilers: evaluation of stunning efficacy under field conditions". Poultry Science. 95 (5): 1205–1210. doi:10.3382/ps/pew017. ISSN 0032-5791. PMID 26957628.
  4. ^ Hayat, Muhammad Nizam; Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi; Kaka, Ubedullah; Rukayadi, Yaya; Kadir, Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab; Radzi, Mohd Amran Mohd; Kumar, Pavan; Nurulmahbub, Nurul Ain; Sazili, Awis Qurni (July 2024). "Assessing meat quality and textural properties of broiler chickens: the impact of voltage and frequency in reversible electrical water-bath stunning". Poultry Science. 103 (7) 103764. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.103764. ISSN 1525-3171. PMC 11063635. PMID 38669823.
  5. ^ Kissel, Cassiana; Soares, Adriana L.; Oba, Alexandre; Shimokomaki, Massami (2015). "Electrical Water Bath Stunning of Broilers: Effects on Breast Meat Quality". The Journal of Poultry Science. 52 (1): 74–80. doi:10.2141/jpsa.0130160. ISSN 1346-7395.
  6. ^ Shields, Sara J.; Raj, A. B. M. (2010-09-17). "A Critical Review of Electrical Water-Bath Stun Systems for Poultry Slaughter and Recent Developments in Alternative Technologies". Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 13 (4): 281–299. doi:10.1080/10888705.2010.507119. ISSN 1088-8705.
  7. ^ Fuseini, Awal; Miele, Mara; Lever, John (2023-03-03). "Poultry Welfare at Slaughter". Poultry. 2 (1): 98–110. doi:10.3390/poultry2010010. ISSN 2674-1164.
  8. ^ Terlouw, E. M. C.; Arnould, C.; Auperin, B.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E.; Deiss, V.; Lefèvre, F.; Lensink, B. J.; Mounier, L. (2008-01-01). "Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research". Animal. 2 (10): 1501–1517. Bibcode:2008Anim....2.1501T. doi:10.1017/S1751731108002723. ISSN 1751-7311. PMID 22443909.
  9. ^ Sans, Eco; Federici, Jf; Dahlke, F; Molento, Cfm (September 2014). "Evaluation of Free-Range broilers using the welfare quality® protocol". Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. 16 (3): 297–306. doi:10.1590/1516-635x1603297-306. ISSN 1516-635X.
  10. ^ Stevenson, Peter (December 1997). THE WELFARE OF TURKEYS AT SLAUGHTER (Report).
  11. ^ Bala, Vandhana (November 15, 2017). "Re:Petition for Rulemaking to the Food Safety and Inspection Service to Include Chickens, Turkeys, and other Birds Slaughtered for Food Under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act and the Humane Slaughter Provisions of the Federal Meat Inspection Act" (PDF). Letter to Food Safety and Inspection Service.
  12. ^ "Down". FOUR PAWS in Australia - Animal Welfare Organisation. Retrieved 2025-08-23.
  13. ^ Study on various methods of stunning for poultry (PDF) (Report). November 12, 2012.