DNA amplification fingerprinting

DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) is a highly sensitive DNA profiling technique that generates complex, reproducible genomic fingerprints without prior knowledge of sequence information. Developed in the very early 1990s by Gustavo Caetano-Anollés and colleagues at the University of Tennessee,[2] DAF offered a high-resolution alternative to nucleic acid scanning methods such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for genetic typing, strain discrimination, genome mapping, and population analysis.

DAF employs single, very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers, typically 5-8 nucleotides (nt) in length, and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify multiple anonymous regions dispersed throughout the genome.[3] Because the primers are extremely short, they anneal at numerous partially complementary sites. When two sites occur in opposite orientation and within amplifiable distance (generally < 3–5 kb), the intervening segment is amplified. Resolution of the resulting products by high-resolution denaturing or native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), followed by silver staining, produces dozens to hundreds of bands that together form a characteristic genomic "fingerprint," with individual bands often serving as genetic markers.[4]

DAF is distinguished from related arbitrarily amplified DNA techniques by its high primer-to-template ratios, procedural simplicity, strong reproducibility, and high multiplex capacity. In addition to whole genomes, fingerprints can be generated from subgenomic fragments such as PCR amplified products, cloned DNA, and complementary DNA (cDNA) populations.

Mechanism

DAF relies on a thermostable DNA polymerase (e.g. Taq polymerase or truncated versions of the enzyme such as the Stoffel fragment) operating under low annealing stringency to achieve primer-directed amplification of genomic DNA.[2][3] The enzyme amplifies genomic segments located between inversely oriented primer binding sites. Initial amplicons arising from anonymous regions between these sites become "preferential templates" in subsequent cycles because they carry perfect primer complements at their termini. As a result, extension products from one cycle serve as optimal templates for further priming and synthesis in the next, leading to exponential enrichment of these fragments. The outcome is a complex mixture of DNA fragments of varying sizes and abundances that reflect the genomic distribution of short primer-matching motifs, distances between them, sequence polymorphisms that create or abolish priming sites, and insertion/deletions (indels) that alter fragment length. In this way, DAF reveals polymorphism without targeting specific loci.

A mechanistic model for DNA amplification with arbitrary primers was proposed by Caetano-Anollés et al.[5] (but also see[3][6]). The model emphasizes the competitive interplay between primer–template and template–template interactions established primarily during the first few PCR amplification cycles.[5][7] During this initial template-screening phase, a subset of genomic regions is preferentially recruited into amplification through primer–template–enzyme interactions that tolerate substantial mismatch, enabling very short arbitrary primers to anneal at multiple sites. Once extension occurs, first-round amplification products are single-stranded molecules that often contain inverted complementary sequences at their termini. These sequences promote intramolecular base pairing (hairpin loop formation) and intermolecular duplex formation through template–template annealing, introducing competing structural conformations in subsequent cycles. Primers must then recognize, invade, and displace these structures to permit polymerase binding and extension. Consequently, only early amplicons whose conformations allow efficient primer access continue to amplify efficiently. Finally, as amplification proceeds, the reaction approaches a dynamic equilibrium among competing single strands, hairpins, duplexes, primer–template complexes, and enzyme-bound intermediates. Within this mixture, the relatively rare but productive primer–template duplexes are continuously converted into accumulating products, yielding the complex yet reproducible banding patterns characteristic of DAF.

This model explains why genome-scanning techniques amplify a defined, reproducible subset genomic fragments rather than sampling the genome at random, with outcomes largely determined by events in the earliest PCR cycles.

Primer design and amplification conditions

Primers are arbitrarily selected and used at high concentrations (3-30 μM) compared with those typical of AP-PCR (1-10 μM) and RAPD (0.3 μM).[6] Their sequences are not designed to target any specific known gene or genomic region. Primer lengths approach the minimum configuration capable of supporting DNA amplification.[3][5][8] Successful amplification requires primers at least 5 nt, but preferably 8 nt in length, with annealing dependent on perfect homology to the first 5-6 nt from the 3' terminus.[5] The short primer length promotes mismatch-tolerant priming, resulting in the amplification of dozens to hundreds of fragments of varying size.

Primers can be screened by their ability to detect polymorphisms. For example, in studies of genetic diversity in white lupin (Lupinus albus), 56 octamer primers were evaluated, of which 22 produced highly polymorphic DAF patterns useful for distinguishing accessions.[9] Primers can also be chosen to modulate DNA profile complexity.[6][10] Very short primers (5-6 nt in length) tend to produce simple banding patterns resembling those of RAPD,[5] whereas longer primers (≥ 20 nt) can be used reproducibly[11] but often yield less complex profiles.[6] Primers engineered to contain an extraordinarily stable mini-hairpin[12] at the 5' terminus allow reduction of the arbitrary 3' sequence to as few as 3 nt, enabling controlled amplification of low-complexity templates such as plasmids and PCR fragments while increasing detection of polymorphic DNA.[7] Incorporation of reporter groups (e.g., fluorophores or biotin) at the 5' terminus or the use of degenerate bases within the primer sequence, can further tailor DNA profile complexity and facilitate variant fingerprinting.[7] Substitutions with inosine generally simplifies patternsm whereas substitutions with any of the four possible nucleotides increases profile complexity.

Reactions are optimized for high stringency but still permissive enough for multiple priming events.[13] Because many interacting variables affect amplification efficiency and banding patterns, optimization is labor-intensive and typically relies on iterative or statistically designed experiments (e.g., matrix analysis,[14] fractional factorial designs,[15] or Taguchi experimental design methods[1]) rather than exhaustive testing. A central determinant of DAF performance is the very high primer-to-template ratio, with primer concentration, template quantity, and DNA quality all influencing reproducibility. Choice of thermostable DNA polymerase is critical, as different enzymes produce markedly different fingerprints. Truncated enzymes such as the Stoffel fragment are preferred for their stability and tolerance to variable magnesium levels.[14] Ionic components, especially magnesium and its interaction with primers, dNTPs, and buffer ions, strongly modulate amplification stringency, making universal buffer formulations impractical across enzymes. Thermal cycling parameters—particularly annealing temperature and denaturation time—shape product yield and distribution, though many parameters have wide tolerances once set within appropriate ranges.

DNA separation, preservation and visualization

DNA profiles are typically resolved by PAGE and silver staining,[16] but can also be generated using agarose gel electrophoresis, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE),[17] temperature sweep gel electrophoresis (TSGE),[18] or automated platforms such as DNA sequencers or capillary electrophoresis (CE). Amplification products may be visualized by silver staining, fluorescent intercalating dyes (e.g. ethidium bromide), or radioactive labeling. Polyester-backed, silver stained polyacrylamide gels can be preserved for decades, often stored in photographic albums. These gels permit straightforward densitometric scanning of DNA profiles and serve both as experimental records and as physical repositories of amplified DNA. The silver stained amplification products can be isolated from the dried gels, re-amplified, cloned and sequenced.[19][20]

DAF variants

DAF variants include mini-hairpin DAF (mhpDAF),[7] arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles (ASAP),[22] and template endonuclease cleaved multiple arbitrary amplicon profiling (tecMAAP).[23] mhpDAF substantially increases the detection of polymorphic DNA during fingerprinting by probing a larger effective portion of the genome through extended and structure-influenced annealing interactions. This expanded scanning capacity can dramatically improve resolution (up to 5-fold ) by preferentially selecting amplicons with extended annealing sites during secondary amplification. ASAP re-amplifies DAF (or other PCR) products using mini-hairpin primers. This two-step strategy allows combinatorial primer use, so that different primer pairs produce distinct fingerprints, greatly expanding discriminatory power, especially when multiplexed. tecMAAP enhances polymorphism detection (up to 100-fold) by digesting template DNA with restriction endonucleases before DAF. Restriction reduces template length, alters primer–template kinetics, and eliminates or creates preferential amplicons depending on sequence variation at restriction sites, thereby increasing sequence discrimination of very closely related genotypes. DAF variants also encompass modifications in the post-amplification resolution of amplification products. For example, Randomly amplified DNA fingerprinting (RAF)[21] enhances profile resolution by labeling amplicons with radioactive 33P or fluorescence and resolving them on large polyacrylamide sequencing gels. This format yields highly reproducible banding patterns, generates measurable fraction of co-dominant markers, and compares favorably with amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) in both analytical efficiency and reliability.

Applications

DAF and its variants have been used for strain, species and cell line identification, population genetics and phylogeography, linkage mapping and marker discovery, assessment of genomic diversity, microbial typing and epidemiology, and discrimination of plant and fungal cultivars. Examples include fingerprinting of bacteria[14] (e.g., Acinetobacter baumanii isolates from intensive care unit patients,[24] mixed bacterial populations in culture bioreactors[25]), population analysis of downy mildew-causing fungi (Pseudoperonospora humuli),[26] development of sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers and DAF of coelomycete fungi (Boeremia exigua),[27] analysis of dogwood anthracnose-causing Discula destructiva fungi,[28] population analysis of fairy ring fungi (Marasmius oreades),[29] identification of insect[30][31][32] and human cell lines,[33] genetic diversity analysis of sweet potato (Ipomoeba batatas),[34] yam (Dioscorea sp.),[35] and the pantropical genus Vigna,[36] and genetic mapping and bulked segregant analysis in pea,[37] soybean,[38] and chickpea.[39]

DAF is an early high-resolution fingerprinting technique, particularly valued from the 1990s to the late 2000s for rapid genetic typing in microbes, plants, and other organisms. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows for whole-genome analysis and for targeted discovery of microsatellites, single nucleotide polymorphisms, an other specific genomic regions, including restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers, promise to displace the simpler genome-scanning methods, including DAF, RAPD, AP-PCR, and AFLP, and their variants. However, DAF remains valuable for low-cost, rapid genomic fingerprinting, retrospective analysis of archived profiles, recovery of anonymous amplicons for sequencing, and exploratory surveys of genomic variation where high-throughput approaches are impractical (see arbitrarily amplified DNA).

Advantages and limitations

DAF requires no prior knowledge of DNA sequence, allowing its application to virtually any organism or engineered construct. The method is fast, reproducible and technically simple (typically, 3-10 h, depending on the thermal cycler), provides high-resolution and reproducibility, permits long-term preservation of DNA fingerprints, and is particularly useful for distinguishing closely related organisms where other methods reveal little variation. These properties separate DAF from the notoriously laboratory-dependent RAPD. However, DAF requires careful optimization of reaction conditions and typically generates dominant markers, which makes discrimination of heterozygotes difficult. However, DAF products can be recovered from polyacrylamide or agarose gels, cloned and converted into co-dominant SCAR markers,[40] allowing distinction between heterozygous and homozygous individuals.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo (1998). "DAF Optimization Using Taguchi Methods and the Effect of Thermal Cycling Parameters on DNA Amplification". BioTechniques. 25 (3): 472–480. doi:10.2144/98253rr03. ISSN 0736-6205. PMID 9762445.
  2. ^ a b Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Brant J., Bassam; Peter M., Gresshoff (1991). "DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Using Very Short Arbitrary Oligonucleotide Primers". Nature Biotechnology. 9 (6): 553–557. Bibcode:1991NatBi...9..553C. doi:10.1038/nbt0691-553. ISSN 1546-1696. PMID 1367225.
  3. ^ a b c d Caetano-Anollés, G. (1993). "Amplifying DNA with arbitrary oligonucleotide primers". Genome Research. 3 (2): 85–94. doi:10.1101/gr.3.2.85. ISSN 1088-9051. PMID 8268791.
  4. ^ Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo (1996). "Scanning of nucleic acids by in vitro amplification: New developments and applications". Nature Biotechnology. 14 (13): 1668–1674. doi:10.1038/nbt1296-1668. ISSN 1546-1696. PMID 9634849.
  5. ^ a b c d e Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Bassam, Brant J.; Gresshoff, Peter M. (1992-11-01). "Primer-template interactions during DNA amplification fingerprinting with single arbitrary oligonucleotides". Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 235 (2): 157–165. Bibcode:1992MolGG.235..157C. doi:10.1007/BF00279356. ISSN 1432-1874. PMID 1465089.
  6. ^ a b c d e Caetano-Anollés, G. (1994). "MAAP: a versatile and universal tool for genome analysis". Plant Molecular Biology. 25 (6): 1011–1026. Bibcode:1994PMolB..25.1011C. doi:10.1007/BF00014674. ISSN 1573-5028. PMID 7919212.
  7. ^ a b c d Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Gresshoff, Peter M. (1994). "DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Using Arbitrary Mini-hairpin Oligonucleotide Primers". Nature Biotechnology. 12 (6): 619–623. doi:10.1038/nbt0694-619. ISSN 1546-1696. PMID 7764952.
  8. ^ Vincent, John; Gurling, Hugh; Melmer, Georg (1994-01-01). "Oligonucleotides as Short as 7-Mers Can Be Used for PCR Amplification". DNA and Cell Biology. 13 (1): 75–82. doi:10.1089/dna.1994.13.75. ISSN 1044-5498. PMID 8286042.
  9. ^ Qiu, J.; van Santen, E.; Tuzun, S. (1995). "Optimization of DNA amplification fingerprinting techniques to study genetic relationships of white lupin germplasm". Plant Breeding. 114 (6): 525–529. Bibcode:1995PBree.114..525Q. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb00849.x. ISSN 0179-9541. Archived from the original on 2023-11-27.
  10. ^ Caetano-Anollés, G. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "Fingerprint Tailoring", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 103–117, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_13, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  11. ^ Díaz-Perales, Araceli; Linacero, Rosario; Vázquez, Ana M. (2001). "DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Using Two Long Primers". BioTechniques. 30 (4): 718–720. doi:10.2144/01304bm01. ISSN 0736-6205. PMID 11314250.
  12. ^ Hirao, Ichiro; Nishimura, Yoshifumi; Naraoka, Tetsushi; Watanabe, Kimutsuna; Arata, Yoji; Miura, Kin-ichiro (1989). "Extraordinary stable structure of short single-stranded DNA fragments containing a specific base sequence: d(GCGAAAGC)". Nucleic Acids Research. 17 (6): 2223–2231. doi:10.1093/nar/17.6.2223. ISSN 0305-1048. PMC 317592. PMID 2704619.
  13. ^ Caetano-Anollés, G. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "DNA Amplification Fingerprinting", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 65–80, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_10, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  14. ^ a b c Bassam, Brant J.; Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Gresshoff, Peter M. (1992). "DNA amplification fingerprinting of bacteria". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 38 (1): 70–76. doi:10.1007/BF00169422. ISSN 0175-7598. PMID 1369011.
  15. ^ Wolff, K.; Schoen, E. D.; Rijn, J. Peters-Van (1993). "Optimizing the generation of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in chrysanthemum". Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 86 (8): 1033–1037. doi:10.1007/BF00211058. ISSN 0040-5752. PMID 24194014.
  16. ^ Caetano-Anollés, G. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "Resolving DNA Amplification Products Using Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Silver Staining", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 119–134, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_14, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  17. ^ Dweikat, I.; Mackenzie, S. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis for Enhanced Detection of DNA Polymorphisms", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 135–141, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_15, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  18. ^ Penner, G. A. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "Modified Temperature Sweep Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of Arbitrarily Amplified DNA Fragments", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 143–148, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_16, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  19. ^ Weaver, KR; Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Gresshoff, Peter M.; Callahan, Lloyd M. (1994). "Isolation and cloning of DNA amplification products from silver stained polyacrylamide gels". BioTechniques. 16 (2): 226–227. PMID 7514004.
  20. ^ Caetano-Anollés, G. (1997), Micheli, Maria Rita; Bova, Rodolfo (eds.), "Recovering Amplified DNA from Silver Stained Gels", Fingerprinting Methods Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 153–160, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60441-6_18, ISBN 978-3-642-60441-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  21. ^ a b Waldron, Julie; Peace, Cameron P.; Searle, Iain R.; Furtado, Agnelo; Wade, Nick; Findlay, Ian; Graham, Michael W.; Carroll, Bernard J. (2002). "Randomly Amplified DNA Fingerprinting: A Culmination of DNA Marker Technologies Based on Arbitrarily-Primed PCR Amplification". BioMed Research International. 2 (3): 141–150. doi:10.1155/S1110724302206026. ISSN 2314-6133. PMC 161367. PMID 12488579.
  22. ^ Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Gresshoff, Peter M. (1996). "Generation of Sequence Signatures from DNA Amplification Fingerprints with Mini-Hairpin and Microsatellite Primers". BioTechniques. 20 (6): 1044–1056. doi:10.2144/96206rr02. ISSN 0736-6205. PMID 8780875.
  23. ^ Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Bassam, Brant J.; Gresshoff, Peter M. (1993). "Enhanced detection of polymorphic DNA by multiple arbitrary amplicon profiling of endonuclease-digested DNA: identification of markers tightly linked to the supernodulation locus in soybean". Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 241–241 (1–2): 57–64. doi:10.1007/BF00280201. ISSN 0026-8925. PMID 8232212.
  24. ^ Sheehan, C.; Boissel, L.; Lynch, M.; Cryan, B.; Fanning, S. (1996). "DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) applied to the investigation ofAcinetobacter baumanii isolated from intensive care unit patients". Irish Journal of Medical Science. 165 (1): 44–48. doi:10.1007/BF02942802. ISSN 0021-1265. PMID 8867499.
  25. ^ Breen, Alec; Rope, Alan F.; Taylor, Denise; Loper, John C.; Sferra, P. R. (1995). "Application of DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) to mixed culture bioreactors". Journal of Industrial Microbiology. 14 (1): 10–16. doi:10.1007/BF01570059. ISSN 0169-4146. PMID 8867499.
  26. ^ Chee, Hee Youn; Nelson, Mark E.; Grove, Gary G.; Eastwell, Kenneth C.; Kenny, Stephen T.; Klein, Robert E. (2006). "Population Biology of Pseudoperonospora humuli in Oregon and Washington". Plant Disease. 90 (10): 1283–1286. Bibcode:2006PlDis..90.1283C. doi:10.1094/PD-90-1283. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30780933.
  27. ^ Aveskamp, Maikel M.; Woudenberg, Joyce H.C.; De Gruyter, Johannes; Turco, Elena; Groenewald, Johannes Z.; Crous, Pedro W. (2009). "Development of taxon-specific sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers based on actin sequences and DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF): a case study in the Phoma exigua species complex". Molecular Plant Pathology. 10 (3): 403–414. Bibcode:2009MolPP..10..403A. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00540.x. ISSN 1464-6722. PMC 6640366. PMID 19400842.
  28. ^ Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Trigiano, Robert N.; Windham, Mark T. (2001). "Patterns of evolution in Discula fungi and the origin of dogwood anthracnose in North America, studied using arbitrarily amplified and ribosomal DNA". Current Genetics. 39 (5–6): 346–354. doi:10.1007/s002940100223. ISSN 0172-8083. PMID 11525409.
  29. ^ Abesha, Emnet; Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo; Høiland, Klaus (2003). "Population genetics and spatial structure of the fairy ring fungus Marasmius oreades in a Norwegian sand dune ecosystem". Mycologia. 95 (6): 1021–1031. doi:10.1080/15572536.2004.11833018. ISSN 0027-5514. PMID 21149011.
  30. ^ McIntosh, A. H.; Grasela, J. J.; Matted, R. L. (1996). "Identification of insect cell lines by DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF)". Insect Molecular Biology. 5 (3): 187–195. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00053.x. ISSN 0962-1075. PMID 8799737.
  31. ^ Liu, Guangfu; Xu, Yipeng; Yu, Xiaoping (2015). "Establishment and characterization of a new cell line of Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae)". In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal. 51 (3): 218–221. doi:10.1007/s11626-014-9831-5. ISSN 1071-2690. PMID 25381037.
  32. ^ Reall, Tamra; Kraus, Susanne; Goodman, Cynthia L.; Ringbauer, Joseph; Geibel, Sven; Stanley, David (2019). "Next-generation cell lines established from the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal. 55 (9): 686–693. doi:10.1007/s11626-019-00394-9. ISSN 1543-706X. PMID 31410641.
  33. ^ Crawford, Brian H.; Hussain, Akm A.; Jideama, Nathan M. (2006). "Evidence of a Genomic Biomarker in Normal Human Epithelial Mammary Cell Line, MCF-10A, That Is Absent in the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line, MCF-7". BioMed Research International. 2006 (2) 43181. doi:10.1155/JBB/2006/43181. ISSN 2314-6133. PMC 1510942. PMID 16883051.
  34. ^ He, Guohao; Prakash, C. S.; Jarret, R. L. (1995). "Analysis of genetic diversity in a sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collection using DNA amplification fingerprinting". Genome. 38 (5): 938–945. doi:10.1139/g95-123. ISSN 0831-2796. PMID 8537002.
  35. ^ Vendl, Oliver; Wawrosch, Christoph; Noe, Christian; Molina, Carlos; Kahl, Günter; Kopp, Brigitte (2006-12-01). "Diosgenin Contents and DNA Fingerprint Screening of Various Yam (Dioscorea sp.) Genotypes". Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 61 (11–12): 847–855. doi:10.1515/znc-2006-11-1213. ISSN 1865-7125. PMID 17294697.
  36. ^ Simon, M.V.; Benko-Iseppon, A.-M.; Resende, L.V.; Winter, P.; Kahl, G. (2007). Scoles, G.J. (ed.). "Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Vigna Savi germplasm revealed by DNA amplification fingerprinting". Genome. 50 (6): 538–547. doi:10.1139/G07-029. ISSN 0831-2796. PMID 17632575.
  37. ^ Men, A. E.; Borisov, A. Y.; Rozov, S. M.; Ushakov, K. V.; Tsyganov, V. E.; Tikhonovich, I. A.; Gresshoff, P. M. (1999). "Identification of DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) markers close to the symbiosis-ineffective sym31 mutation of pea (Pisum sativum L.)". Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 98 (6): 929–936. doi:10.1007/s001220051152. ISSN 1432-2242.
  38. ^ Kolchinsky, A.; Landau-Ellis, D.; Gresshoff, P. M. (1997). "Map order and linkage distances of molecular markers close to the supernodulation (nts-1) locus of soybean". Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 254 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1007/s004380050387. ISSN 1432-1874. PMID 9108287.
  39. ^ Benko-Iseppon, A.-M.; Winter, P.; Huettel, B.; Staginnus, C.; Muehlbauer, F. J.; Kahl, G. (2003). "Molecular markers closely linked to fusarium resistance genes in chickpea show significant alignments to pathogenesis-related genes located on Arabidopsis chromosomes 1 and 5". Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 107 (2): 379–386. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1260-x. ISSN 0040-5752. PMC 6640366. PMID 19400842.
  40. ^ Paran, I.; Michelmore, R. W. (1993). "Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuce". Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 85 (8): 985–993. doi:10.1007/BF00215038. ISSN 0040-5752. PMID 24196149.

DNA Kaffe – a forum for DNA marker methodologies: [1]

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.