Crouzeix's conjecture

Crouzeix's conjecture is an unsolved problem in matrix analysis. It was proposed by Michel Crouzeix in 2004,[1] and it can be stated as follows:

where the set is the field of values of a n×n (i.e. square) complex matrix and is a complex function that is analytic in the interior of and continuous up to the boundary of . Slightly reformulated, the conjecture can also be stated as follows: for all square complex matrices and all complex polynomials :

holds, where the norm on the left-hand side is the spectral operator 2-norm.

History

Crouzeix's theorem, proved in 2007, states that:[2]

(the constant is independent of the matrix dimension, thus transferable to infinite-dimensional settings).

Michel Crouzeix and Cesar Palencia proved in 2017 that the result holds for ,[3] improving the original constant of . More recently, dimension-dependent improvements have been obtained: Malman, Mashreghi, O'Loughlin and Ransford showed that for each fixed dimension there exists a constant such that the inequality holds for all matrices.[4]

Related work connects the constant in Crouzeix-type inequalities to configuration constants arising from the Neumann–Poincaré operator and yields domain-dependent improvements of the Crouzeix–Palencia bound in certain settings.[5]

The not yet proved conjecture states that the constant can be refined to .

Special cases

While the general case is unknown, it is known that the conjecture holds for some special cases. For instance, it holds for all normal matrices,[6] for tridiagonal 3×3 matrices with elliptic field of values centered at an eigenvalue[7] and for general n×n matrices that are nearly Jordan blocks.[6]. Furthermore, Anne Greenbaum and Michael L. Overton provided numerical support for Crouzeix's conjecture.[8]

Further reading

  • Ransford, Thomas; Schwenninger, Felix L. (2018-03-01). "Remarks on the Crouzeix–Palencia Proof that the Numerical Range is a -Spectral Set". SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. 39 (1): 342–345. arXiv:1708.08633. doi:10.1137/17M1143757. S2CID 43945191.
  • Gorkin, Pamela; Bickel, Kelly (2018-10-27). "Numerical Range and Compressions of the Shift". arXiv:1810.11680 [math.FA].

References

  1. ^ Crouzeix, Michel (2004-04-01). "Bounds for Analytical Functions of Matrices". Integral Equations and Operator Theory. 48 (4): 461–477. doi:10.1007/s00020-002-1188-6. ISSN 0378-620X. S2CID 121371601.
  2. ^ Crouzeix, Michel (2007-03-15). "Numerical range and functional calculus in Hilbert space". Journal of Functional Analysis. 244 (2): 668–690. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2006.10.013.
  3. ^ Crouzeix, Michel; Palencia, Cesar (2017-06-07). "The Numerical Range is a -Spectral Set". SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. 38 (2): 649–655. doi:10.1137/17M1116672.
  4. ^ Malman, Bartosz; Mashreghi, Javad; O'Loughlin, Ryan; Ransford, Thomas (2024). "On the Crouzeix ratio for matrices". arXiv:2409.14127 [math.FA].{{cite arXiv}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Malman, Bartosz; Mashreghi, Javad; O'Loughlin, Ryan; Ransford, Thomas (2025-04-10). "Double-Layer Potentials, Configuration Constants, and Applications to Numerical Ranges". International Mathematics Research Notices. 2025 (8) rnaf084. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaf084.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ a b Choi, Daeshik (2013-04-15). "A proof of Crouzeix's conjecture for a class of matrices". Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 438 (8): 3247–3257. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2012.12.045.
  7. ^ Glader, Christer; Kurula, Mikael; Lindström, Mikael (2018-03-01). "Crouzeix's Conjecture Holds for Tridiagonal 3 x 3 Matrices with Elliptic Numerical Range Centered at an Eigenvalue". SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. 39 (1): 346–364. arXiv:1701.01365. doi:10.1137/17M1110663. S2CID 43922128.
  8. ^ Greenbaum, Anne; Overton, Michael L. (2017-05-04). "Numerical investigation of Crouzeix's conjecture" (PDF). Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 542: 225–245. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2017.04.035.

See also