Artificial intelligence in hiring

Artificial intelligence can be used to automate aspects of the job recruitment process. Advances in artificial intelligence, such as the advent of machine learning and the growth of big data, enable AI to be utilized to recruit, screen, and predict the success of applicants.[1][2] Proponents of artificial intelligence in hiring claim it reduces bias, assists with finding qualified candidates, and frees up human resource workers' time for other tasks, while opponents worry that AI perpetuates inequalities in the workplace and will eliminate jobs. Despite the potential benefits, the ethical implications of AI in hiring remain a subject of debate, with concerns about algorithmic transparency, accountability, and the need for ongoing oversight to ensure fair and unbiased decision-making throughout the recruitment process.[3]

Background

It is common for companies to use AI to automate aspects of their hiring process, especially the hospitality, finance, and tech industries.[4]

Uses

Screeners

Screeners are tests that allow companies to sift through a large applicant pool and extract applicants that have desirable features.[5]

What factors are used to screen applicants is a concern to ethicists and civil rights activists.[6] A screener that favors people who have similar characteristics to those already employed at a company may perpetuate inequalities. For example, if a company that is predominantly white and male uses its employees' data to train its screener it may accidentally create a screening process that favors white, male applicants. The automation of screeners also has the potential to reduce biases. Biases against applicants with African American sounding names have been shown in multiple studies.[7] An AI screener has the potential to limit human bias and error in the hiring process, allowing more minority applicants to be successful.[8]

Recruitment

Recruitment involves the identification of potential applicants and the marketing of positions. AI is commonly utilized in the recruitment process because it can help boost the number of qualified applicants for positions.[9] Companies are able to use AI to target their marketing to applicants who are likely to be good fits for a position. This often involves the use of social media sites advertising tools, which rely on AI. Facebook allows advertisers to target ads based on demographics, location, interests, behavior, and connections. Facebook also allows companies to target a "look-a-like" audience, that is the company supplies Facebook with a data set, typically the company's current employees, and Facebook will target the ad to profiles that are similar to the profiles in the data set.[10] Additionally, job sites like Indeed, Glassdoor, and ZipRecruiter target job listings to applicants that have certain characteristics employers are looking for. Targeted advertising has many advantages for companies trying to recruit such being a more efficient use of resources, reaching a desired audience, and boosting qualified applicants. This has helped make it a mainstay in modern hiring.[10]

Who receives a targeted ad can be controversial. In hiring, the implications of targeted ads have to do with who is able to find out about and then apply to a position. Most targeted ad algorithms are proprietary information. Some platforms, like Facebook and Google, allow users to see why they were shown a specific ad, but users who do not receive the ad likely never know of its existence and also have no way of knowing why they were not shown the ad.[10]

Interviews

Chatbots were one of the first applications of AI and are commonly used in the hiring process.[11] Interviewees interact with chatbots to answer interview questions, and an analysis of their responses can be generated by AI.[12] HireVue has created technology that analyzes interviewees' responses and gestures during recorded video interviews. Over 12 million interviewees have been screened by the more than 700 companies that utilize the service.[12]

Controversies

Artificial intelligence in hiring confers many benefits, but it also has some challenges that have concerned experts.[13] AI is only as good as the data it is using. Biases can inadvertently be baked into the data used in AI.[1] Often companies will use data from their employees to decide what people to recruit or hire. This can perpetuate bias and lead to more homogenous workforces. Facebook Ads was an example of a platform that created such controversy for allowing business owners to specify what type of employee they are looking for. For example, job advertisements for nursing and teach could be set such that only women of a specific age group would see the advertisements. Facebook Ads has since then removed this function from its platform, citing the potential problems with the function in perpetuating biases and stereotypes against minorities. The growing use of Artificial Intelligence-enabled hiring systems has become an important component of modern talent hiring, particularly through social networks such as LinkedIn and Facebook. However, data overflow embedded in the hiring systems, based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods, may result in unconscious gender bias. Utilizing data driven methods may mitigate some bias generated from these systems [14][15]

It can also be hard to quantify what makes a good employee.[1] This poses a challenge for training AI to predict which employees will be best. Commonly used metrics like performance reviews can be subjective and have been shown to favor white employees over black employees and men over women.[7][16] Another challenge is the limited amount of available data. Employers only collect certain details about candidates during the initial stages of the hiring process. This requires AI to make determinations about candidates with very limited information to go off of. Additionally, many employers do not hire employees frequently and so have limited firm specific data to go off.[1] To combat this, many firms will use algorithms and data from other firms in their industry.[1] AI's reliance on applicant and current employees personal data raises privacy issues. These issues effect both the applicants and current employees, but also may have implications for third parties who are linked through social media to applicants or current employees. For example, a sweep of someone's social media will also show their friends and people they have tagged in photos or posts.[1]

AI and the future of hiring

Artificial intelligence along with other technological advances such as improvements in robotics have placed 47% of jobs at risk of being eliminated in the near future.[17] In 2016 the founder of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, called AI and related technology the "Fourth Industrial Revolution".[18] According to some scholars, however, the transformative impact of AI on labor has been overstated. The "no-real-change" theory holds that an IT revolution has already occurred, but that the benefits of implementing new technologies does not outweigh the costs associated with adopting them. This theory claims that the result of the IT revolution is thus much less impactful than had originally been forecasted.[19] Other scholars refute this theory claiming that AI has already led to significant job loss for unskilled labor and that it will eliminate middle skill and high skill jobs in the future. This position is based around the idea that AI is not yet a technology of general use and that any potential 4th industrial revolution has not fully occurred.[19] A third theory holds that the effect of AI and other technological advances is too complicated to yet be understood. This theory is centered around the idea that while AI will likely eliminate jobs in the short term it will also likely increase the demand for other jobs. The question then becomes will the new jobs be accessible to people and will they emerge near when jobs are eliminated.[19]

AI use in hiring for candidates

Job seekers now commonly encounter AI-driven tools at multiple stages, including automated resume parsing, video interview analysis, chatbots for frequently asked questions, and real‑time application updates. Some candidates also employ AI career agents, designed to optimize job searches, tailor applications, and interface with hiring teams.[20]

A 2025 Australian study found that AI-driven video interviews exhibited transcription error rates of up to 22% for non‑native speakers and those with speech-related disabilities, raising concerns of discrimination.[21] A 2017 study in the Journal of Sociology found persistent gender and racial disparities in AI screening tools, even when fairness interventions are applied.[22]

Industry observers describe a growing “AI arms race” in recruitment, where both employers and candidates increasingly rely on automated agents. Employers use recruiting systems to source and filter applicants, while candidates deploy AI agents to prepare and submit applications.[23]

Regulations

The Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, effective in Illinois since 2020, regulates the use of AI to analyze and evaluate job applicants’ video interviews.[24] This law requires employers to follow guidelines to avoid any issues regarding using AI in the hiring process.[25][26][27]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Tambe, Prasanna; Cappelli, Peter; Yakubovich, Valery (August 2019). "Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward". California Management Review. 61 (4): 15–42. doi:10.1177/0008125619867910. ISSN 0008-1256. S2CID 220124861.
  2. ^ Marabelli, Marco; Newell, Sue (2021). "The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges". Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 30 (3) 101683: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101683.
  3. ^ Beck, Alexander D. (2020-12-29), "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Robo-Advisory", Robo-Advisory, Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 227–243, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40818-3_11, ISBN 978-3-030-40817-6, S2CID 234332593, retrieved 2023-12-02
  4. ^ Torres, Edwin N.; Mejia, Cynthia (2017-02-01). "Asynchronous video interviews in the hospitality industry: Considerations for virtual employee selection". International Journal of Hospitality Management. 61: 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.012. ISSN 0278-4319.
  5. ^ Albaroudi, Elham; Mansouri, Taha; Alameer, Ali (2024-02-07). "A Comprehensive Review of AI Techniques for Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Job Hiring". AI. 5 (1): 383–404. doi:10.3390/ai5010019.
  6. ^ Ricardo, Mimbela; Olga, Akselrod (2024-05-30). "The Long History of Discrimination in Job Hiring Assessments". ACLU. Retrieved 2025-09-04.
  7. ^ a b Rodgers (2019). "Race in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Employment Opportunity and Other Policies". RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. 5 (5): 198. doi:10.7758/rsf.2019.5.5.10. ISSN 2377-8253. S2CID 211443445.
  8. ^ Reynolds, Tania; Zhu, Luke; Aquino, Karl; Strejcek, Brendan (2020-07-02). "Dual pathways to bias: Evaluators' ideology and ressentiment independently predict racial discrimination in hiring contexts". Journal of Applied Psychology. 106 (4): 624–641. doi:10.1037/apl0000804. ISSN 1939-1854. PMID 32614205. S2CID 220306461.
  9. ^ Prem, Kumar. "The Evolving Role of AI in Recruitment and Retention". SHRM LABS. Retrieved 2025-09-04.
  10. ^ a b c "Big Data", Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 75–82, 2018-02-16, doi:10.1002/9781119426653.app1, ISBN 978-1-119-42665-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  11. ^ Babak, Barghi; Eva, Gallardo; Vicence, Fernandez (2022-07-01). "An Overview of Chatbots Usage in Recruitment and Selection Practices". Polytechnic University of Catalonia (BarcelonaTech). Retrieved 2025-09-04.
  12. ^ a b Vardarlier, Pelin; Zafer, Cem (2019-11-10), "Use of Artificial Intelligence as Business Strategy in Recruitment Process and Social Perspective", Contributions to Management Science, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 355–373, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8_17, ISBN 978-3-030-29738-1, S2CID 211758726, retrieved 2020-11-07{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  13. ^ Costigan, Ruth; Stone, Richard (2017-06-29), "9. Freedom to Protest and Public Order Law", Civil Liberties & Human Rights, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/he/9780198744276.003.0009, ISBN 978-0-19-874427-6, retrieved 2020-10-31{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  14. ^ Simon, V.; Rabin, N.; Chalutz-Ben Gal, H. (2023). "Utilizing data driven methods to identify gender bias in LinkedIn profiles" (PDF). Information Processing & Management. 60 (5) 103423. Information Processing & Management, V.60, N. 5, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103423.
  15. ^ Wach, Krzysztof; Duong, Cong Doanh; Ejdys, Joanna; Kazlauskaitė, Rūta; Korzynski, Pawel; Mazurek, Grzegorz; Paliszkiewicz, Joanna; Ziemba, Ewa (2023-06-30). "The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT". Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 11 (2): 7–30. doi:10.15678/EBER.2023.110201. hdl:10419/335386. ISSN 2353-8821.
  16. ^ Sheard, Natalie (2025). "Algorithm-facilitated discrimination: a socio-legal study of the use by employers of artificial intelligence hiring systems". Journal of Law and Society. 52 (2): 269–291. doi:10.1111/jols.12535. ISSN 1467-6478.
  17. ^ Brougham, David; Haar, Jarrod (March 2018). "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees' perceptions of our future workplace". Journal of Management & Organization. 24 (2): 239–257. doi:10.1017/jmo.2016.55. ISSN 1833-3672.
  18. ^ Mashelkar, R. A. (2018-07-08). "Exponential Technology, Industry 4.0 and Future of Jobs in India". Review of Market Integration. 10 (2): 138–157. doi:10.1177/0974929218774408. ISSN 0974-9292. S2CID 158398849.
  19. ^ a b c Boyd, Ross; Holton, Robert J. (2017-08-29). "Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation?". Journal of Sociology. 54 (3): 331–345. doi:10.1177/1440783317726591. ISSN 1440-7833. S2CID 149228281.
  20. ^ "Your next job interview may be conducted by an AI agent". Business Insider. 2025-07-18. Retrieved 2025-08-01.
  21. ^ "People interviewed by AI for jobs face discrimination risks, Australian study warns". The Guardian. 2025-05-14. Retrieved 2025-08-01.
  22. ^ Boyd, Ross; Holton, Robert J. (2017-08-29). "Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation?". Journal of Sociology. 54 (3): 331–345. doi:10.1177/1440783317726591. ISSN 1440-7833. S2CID 149228281.
  23. ^ "The AI arms race in hiring is a huge mess for everyone". Financial Times. 2025-07-20. Retrieved 2025-08-01.
  24. ^ "Illinois Becomes First State to Regulate Employers' Use of Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate Video Interviews | Davis Wright Tremaine". www.dwt.com. Retrieved 2022-10-15.
  25. ^ "820 ILCS 42/ Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act". www.ilga.gov. Retrieved 2024-02-23.
  26. ^ "EEOC Launches Initiative on Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Fairness". U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retrieved 2025-12-10.
  27. ^ "Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, and Disability Discrimination in Hiring". ADA.gov. 2025-11-13. Retrieved 2025-12-10.