Access journalism
Access journalism, or access reporting, refers to journalism (often in interview form) which prioritizes access—meaning media time with important, rich, famous, powerful, or otherwise influential people in politics, culture, sports, and other areas—over journalistic objectivity and/or integrity.[1]
Features
Typical features of access journalism include:[2]
- absence of demanding accountability towards the questioned respondent
- avoiding controversial topics so as to maintain access to the respondent
- can be vague and non-specific
- pre-approved questions, no gotcha questions, softball questions
- sometimes even respondent's control over how the interview will be edited and which parts will be aired
- can be published quickly and distributed widely
Access journalism, in some cases, is similar to infomercials, or advertising disguised as news. The venture of doing the interview can be symbiotic—beneficial for both the journalist and the celebrity, since it can synergically bring more attention to both of them, and further notability, influence, media exposure, current relevance, etc., for both of them.[3]
Access journalism has been contrasted with accountability journalism.[4] A similar contrast is between lapdog journalism and watchdog journalism.[5]
See also
References
- ^ "Relevance and Challenges of the Agenda-Setting Theory in the Changed Media Landscape" (PDF). American Communication Journal. Retrieved 2024-08-13.
- ^ Manning, Peter (2018-12-20). "How 'access journalism' is threatening investigative journalism". The Conversation. Retrieved 2025-08-08.
- ^ "What Americans know, and don't, about how journalism works". American Press Institute. Retrieved 2024-08-13.
- ^ "Access Journalism vs Accountability Journalism". Stereophile. 15 April 2015.
- ^ "Watchdogs or Lapdogs? What State Ads Are Subtracting from Critical Journalism". Open Society Foundations. Retrieved 2024-08-13.