2026 Poland 2050 leadership election

2026 Poland 2050 leadership election
10 January 2026 (first round)
12 January 2026 (second round, annulled)
31 January 2026 (second round)
 
Candidate Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz Paulina Hennig-Kloska
Popular vote 350 307
Percentage 53.27% 46.73%
Chairman before election

Szymon Hołownia

 Elected Chairman

Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz

The 2026 Poland 2050 leadership election was held in January 2026 to elect the leader of Poland 2050, with the outgoing leader, Szymon Hołownia, retiring from the position amongst the party's poor performances in elections. Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz narrowly defeated Paulina Hennig-Kloska for the position. In the first round of the leadership election on 10 January, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and Hennig-Kloska, representatives of two rival internal factions within the party, advanced to the second round, which was held on 12 January. However, the second round was annulled during voting due to an issue with the voting software, leading to its rescheduling to 31 January.

Electoral system

The party was provisionally chaired by Michał Kobosko in 2020–2022 until Hołownia took chairmanship over his party in 2022,[1] later being selected as party chairman for a three-year term at the first National Convention of the party on 21 January 2023.[2]

The election for party leader of Poland 2050 takes place every three years.[3] Initially, the election was scheduled for 10 January 2026 (9:15 to 15:00 CET),[4] with a runoff on 12 January (16:00 to 22:00 CET),[5] since no candidate gained the support of over 50% of delegates,[6] although the second round was invalidated and rescheduled for 31 January 2026 (16:00 to 22:00 CET).[7][8][9] The support signature collection period began on 20 October 2025, with official registrations beginning on 9 December[10] and ended on 10 December.[11][12] Candidates were required to electronically[13] collect 84 signatures from party members to register in the election.[14] The final list of successfully registered candidates was to be released by 13 December,[12] though ultimately, it was released on 11 December.[15]

Only "regular members" of the party are eligible to vote.[3] Poland 2050 had around 800-860 eligible voters in the 2026 leadership election's first round,[6][16][17][18] and around 800 in the second.[19] The vote was conducted electronically using the Interankiety.pl web service, with voters receiving emailed election formulas,[20] and the election was monitored by "special observers".[21] According to TVN 24, in the repeat on the second round, a different service than Interankiety.pl was used to avoid issues.[22]

On 17 January, the party's National Council (Polish: Rada Krajowa) was to convene for the election of four of the nine National Board (Polish: Zarząd Krajowy) members, with four selected by the new party leader and one being the party's parliamentary club leader (currently Paweł Śliz).[23] However, this was hastened to 16 January following the invalidation of the runoff,[24] but during the meeting, the proceedings were paused and resumed on 19 January.[25] Ultimately, the election for four of the party's National Board members was postponed to 7 February.[7]

On 21 January, the term of the party's parliamentary representation in the National Council expired.[26] On 22 January, the parliamentary group selected nine new representatives for the National Council, six from the Sejm and three from the Senate.[a] The party also removed Aleksandra Leo as the co-chair of the Sejm parliamentary group, replacing her with Bartosz Romowicz.[28]

Until 15 January, party's election commission was chaired by Maurycy Przyrowski,[29] and he was later replaced by Marta Cienkowska.[8]

Background

Main article: Poland 2050 § History

Poland 2050, officially Szymon Hołownia's Poland 2050 (Polish: Polska 2050 Szymona Hołowni), was founded as a political vehicle for Szymon Hołownia's political ambitions following his good performance in the 2020 Polish presidential election, where he gained 13.9% of the vote in the first round. The party surged in popularity quickly — in mid-2021, it reached its all-time high, positioning itself as the second most popular party in many opinion polls at the time, before declining to third place and later hovering above the 5% electoral threshold. Due to its declining performance, it allied itself with the Polish People's Party (PSL) and other small parties to form the centre-right Third Way political alliance. In the 2023 parliamentary election, this alliance amassed 14.4% of the vote. However, the coalition would soon start losing support after becoming part of the Third Cabinet of Donald Tusk. Most critically, Third Way would suffer a major defeat in the 2025 presidential election, where Hołownia, its candidate, would only gain 4.99% of the vote.[30]

Following this defeat, PSL declared its exit from the Third Way on 17 June.[31] Hołownia was criticized by liberal election denialists for not preventing the inauguration of the then President-elect, Karol Nawrocki by using his power as Marshal of the Sejm to suspend the inauguration. Later, after a meeting on 4 July with the opposition leader, Jarosław Kaczyński of the Law and Justice party, his own position within the ruling coalition and his own party weakened,[32] with two posełs leaving the party and becoming independents.[33][34] By the time of the leadership election, according to many pollsters, Poland 2050 sat below the 5% electoral threshold required to enter the Sejm. Additionally, the party suffered from a large amount of debt accumulated over its existence, with around 11 million PLN of debt accumulated from the 2023 parliamentary and 2025 presidential elections.[35] Poland 2050's unfavourable election results also contributed to the creation of New Poland, a party with similar ideals to those of Hołownia's party.[36]

On 27 September, Hołownia announced that he would not participate in the next leadership election, stating that it was the "right moment" to change the party's leader.[37] He then announced his application for the role of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.[38]

On 30 September, Poland 2050 recommended Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz to the office of Deputy Prime Minister, narrowly defeating her internal party rival, Paulina Hennig-Kloska, for the nomination in votes at both the party's parliamentary club (16 to 14) and the party's National Council (22 to 19).[39] The vote solidified the split between members supportive of further cooperation with the government and Prime Minister Donald Tusk, including Hennig-Kloska, and those wanting a confrontational stance that supported Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[40]

Campaign

Paulina Hennig-Kloska

Paulina Hennig-Kloska announced her candidacy on 28 November.[41] Hennig-Kloska began her political career in the party Modern founded by Ryszard Petru, also a contestant in the PL2050's 2026 leadership election. She was elected to the Sejm in 2015 before defecting to Poland 2050 in 2021, becoming one of its representatives before its first contested election in 2023, becoming Minister of Climate and Environment after the election.

Hennig-Kloska orients her tenets on three pillars — dialogue, economy and nature,[42] and supports the model of "liberalism with a human face".[43] Hennig-Kloska called for the party to "return to its roots"[17] and support small business.[44] Her official electoral page praised the decrease in inflation and overall economy under Tusk's government, highlighted the issues of green energy, climate change and called for decentralization of the party.[45]

Hennig-Kloska was a prominent personality within the party's faction that seeks cooperation with prime minister Donald Tusk. Wirtualna Polska described her, alongside Petru, Mucha and Kobosko, as informally allied against Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[46] Regardless of this, she criticized Petru's start early in her campaign, stating his ideas are unfit for the party.[47] Early in her campaign, she announced that she would be conducting a tour of all voivodeships in Poland.[42] She also challenged the party's endorsement of Pełczyńska-Nałęcz for Deputy Prime Minister, stating that would she win, "it would be difficult to imagine having a superior from my own party in the cabinet".[48]

Hennig-Kloska advanced into the second round of the election along with Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, receiving 20% of votes, narrowly ahead of Joanna Mucha who gained 18% of the vote.[49] In her campaign for the second round, she held an online meeting with around 200 of her supporters.[50] However, the second round was invalidated due to a system error, and Hennig-Kloska's rival, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, offered her to co-lead the party by a decision of the party's National Council. Hennig-Kloska rejected the offer.[51] Rzeczpospolita described Hennig-Kloska as the new frontrunner, eclipsing Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, after the 19 January National Council meeting.[52]

Ultimately, Hennig-Kloska lost the election narrowly, being defeated by Pełczyńska-Nałęcz with 53 of the vote.[53]

Szymon Hołownia

Although the outgoing leader, Szymon Hołownia, did not register for the first two rounds of the election, he remained actively involved in the process and, following the invalidation of the second round, attempted to enter the contest.

On 27 September, Hołownia officially declared his intention not to start in the party's routine 2026 leadership election, stating that it was the "right moment" for the party to change its leadership.[37] Early in the campaign, party members and media speculated that Hołownia might retract his statement not to run,[54] especially considering the slim chances of his United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees application succeeding.[b] Several politicians openly called for Hołownia to retract his withdrawal and remain as the party leader, including other candidates: in October, Michał Kobosko supported a return for Hołownia.[56] Hołownia's supporters collected the required signatures for him to register, and proposals were even made to extend the registration period beyond the 10 December deadline so that he could still enter the race. Hołownia nevertheless reiterated his intention to step down and ultimately did not register.[57]

Hołownia's stance on participation changed by early January. On 31 December,[c] he created a secret group chat with 12 of his closest supporters.[d] As early as 3 January, some members suggested delaying or cancelling the party election and explored possible legal avenues that would allow Hołownia to remain leader, though Hołownia himself rejected these at the time.[58] However, after the invalidation of the 12 January runoff, Hołownia announced in a press conference on 13 January that he did not rule out running if the first round was to be repeated along with the second.[59] According to Wirtualna Polska, the majority of party members opposed his return at this stage.[60] Despite this, Hołownia declared his intention to contest a repeated election at the meeting of the party's National Council on 16 January,[25] but withdrew once again on 19 January, when the meeting resumed following a three-day break.[61]

In an interview on 26 January, Hołownia stated that he would exit Poland 2050 if either Pełczyńska-Nałęcz or Hennig-Kloska took control over the party,[62] demanding either a repeat of both rounds of the election or for the party to adopt co-leadership between the two runoff candidates.[63] Ultimately, Hołownia failed to re-enter the election, and it was won by Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.

Rafał Kasprzyk

Rafał Kasprzyk announced his candidacy on 8 December.[64] He previously served as an activist of the Modern party, much like Hennig-Kloska and Modern's founder, Ryszard Petru, both contestants in the leadership election. He joined Poland 2050 in 2020, getting elected to the Sejm in 2023.

Kasprzyk emphasized the need for a centrist party in Poland.[65] In his opening announcement, he called for a "new opening" and "rebranding" for the party, rebuilding its credibility and public trust.[64]

Kasprzyk came last in the election with 5% of the vote.[49] He endorsed Hennig-Kloska in the runoff.[66]

Michał Kobosko

Michał Kobosko declared his candidacy on 22 November.[e][67] Kobosko was a journalist tied with several newspapers before becoming a part of Szymon Hołownia's 2020 campaign staff. He became a founder of Poland 2050 and its temporary chairman between 2020 and 2022 before the assumption of the position by Hołownia, and was then elected to the Sejm in 2023 and the European Parliament in 2024.

Kobosko supported presenting Poland 2050 as a "centrist-liberal" party of "liberalism with a human face" — reducing social inequality while supporting entrepreneurs.[67] Despite desiring to contest the next parliamentary election without any electoral allies, he stated his openness to an electoral bloc of the coalition, especially the Civic Coalition and Polish People's Party, against the rise of far-right parties in the country.[67][68] He described the situation in Poland 2050 as a "crisis of leadership" and stated restoring belief in success and a new party program as his primary goals.[67]

Onet informed of Kobosko's withdrawal on 30 December. Despite not explicitly endorsing anyone, he stated he has "fingers crossed" for Hennig-Kloska, Mucha and Petru,[69] whom he was allied to against Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[46]

Joanna Mucha

Joanna Mucha announced her candidacy on 29 October.[70] Mucha was first elected to the Sejm in 2007 as a part of the Civic Platform, becoming the Minister of Sport and Tourism from 2011 until 2013. She previously ran for party chairman of the Civic Platform in 2020, but withdrew to support Borys Budka. Ultimately, she defected to Poland 2050 in 2021, becoming part of the party's parliamentary representation.[71]

Mucha desires to strongly present Poland 2050 as a centrist party in between the liberal-conservative Civic Coalition and the right-wing Law and Justice. However, she rejects any coalition with the latter.[72][73] Mucha was also critical of the party's former alliance with the Polish People's Party,[74] and opposes forming any electoral blocs for the next parliamentary election.[75] She seeks to have Poland 2050 to secure a victory matching its result 2 years before (where PL2050 and PSL scored 14.4% together), and for this victory to ensure a continuation of the incumbent coalition.[76] She seeks to return the party to its "roots" as a "project of the future", orienting the party around climate and digitization issues, such as AI adoption,[73] and promises to form Poland 2050 into a party that "sees, hears and feels, recognizes and understands the needs of Poles."[77]

Mucha was a member of the alliance against frontrunner Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[46] She criticized Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, stating she deviated from the ideology of the party.[78]

Mucha was eliminated in the first round of the election, earning 18% of the vote, close behind Hennig-Kloska, who entered the runoff with 20%.[49] In the second round, Mucha endorsed Hennig-Kloska.[79]

Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz

Frontrunner Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz was the third to announce her candidacy, doing so on 21 November.[80] Pełczyńska-Nałęcz served as the Polish ambassador to Russia in 2014–2016 and later began engaging in politics as a presidential campaign staffer for Szymon Hołownia in the 2020 presidential election. She was then chosen as the Minister of Funds and Regional Policy in 2023. Despite deciding not to run in elections to the Sejm in 2023, she declared her candidacy in the next Sejm election.[81]

In her announcement, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz laid out three points: strengthening the party and its structures, presenting the party and its values to the public, and preparing the party for an independent start in the next parliamentary election, without attaching itself to any other parties.[80] She views the party's electorate as "moderate, balanced, family-oriented, pragmatic" rather than anti-establishment.[81] She rejects "extreme liberalism" and supports a social market economy,[82] understanding the concept of social market economy as market economy "for the consumer and competition, not for influential narrow interest groups and lobbies".[83] In taxation, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz supports lowering the tax burden on businessmen while raising the taxes on big corporations.[82] She was described by OKO.press as of a social democratic orientation.[84]

Pełczyńska-Nałęcz was considered a leading figure in the faction of the party seeking confrontation with prime minister Donald Tusk and a frontrunner in the race.[85][86] OKO.press described her as a "grey eminence" within the party.[84] She was internally supported by outgoing leader Hołownia, although not officially endorsed by him,[85] but faces opposition from most other candidates in the leadership election,[87] and it was speculated that her election could result in the splitting off of a large part of the party's parliamentary representation along factional lines.[88][89] According to TVN 24, her position among party members decreased since her start in the election.[90] Onet described the election as a plebiscite regarding Pełczyńska-Nałęcz's leadership.[20]

Pełczyńska-Nałęcz advanced into the second round of the election along with Hennig-Kloska, receiving 42% of votes.[49] Due to a system error, the second round held on 12 January was invalidated, and before a 19 January National Council meeting to resolve the issue, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz offered Hennig-Kloska for both of them to be elected as co-leaders of the party by a decision of the council,[51] highlighting that such a solution has worked in different parties (like the KWiN, NL, SPD),[91] although Hennig-Kloska rejected such a solution.[51]

Ultimately, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz emerged victorious, defeating Hennig-Kloska with 53% of the vote.[53]

Ryszard Petru

On 1 October, Ryszard Petru was the first to declare a start in the leadership election. Petru was the founder of the Modern political party, which entered the Sejm in 2015, although he was ultimately removed from party leadership in 2017, narrowly defeated by Katarzyna Lubnauer. The party, alongside the Polish Initiative and The Greens, was then joined into the Civic Coalition alliance[f] as a junior partner to the Civic Platform led by Donald Tusk. Petru joined Poland 2050 for the 2023 parliamentary election, returning to the Sejm on its lists.

Petru was considered among the most prominently pro-business members of the party.[92] In his campaign, Petru promised to strongly stand on the side of businessmen, supporting an austere budget and restriction of welfare programs. He seeks to return the party to attaining "7-10% of the vote" by competing for voters with the far-right Confederation for its economically liberal voters which he deems voted for Poland 2050 in 2023 but defected to the Confederation afterwards,[93][94] by returning to the "roots" of Poland 2050.[95]

Petru was a member of the alliance against Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[46] He voted against Pełczyńska-Nałęcz's candidacy for Deputy Prime Minister,[95] considering her a left-winger compared to his liberal stances.[10] Petru submitted his registration for the election on 17 November, with 100 signatures of support.[96] Despite his name recognition, support for his candidacy among the party rank-and-file was considered low at the start of the campaign,[97] and he began a tour of local party structures early on.[10] On 22 December, Petru presented a proposed composition of the party's management. The proposition included most of his leadership election opponents: Michał Kobosko (first vice-chair), Joanna Mucha (second vice-chair), Rafał Kasprzyk (general secretary), Paulina Hennig-Kloska (member of the management) and Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz (member of the management), and also non-opponent Paweł Śliz (member of the management) as well as Katarzyna Karpa-Świderek as party spokesperson.[98]

Petru was eliminated in the first round, gaining 14% of the vote.[49] For the second round, he endorsed Hennig-Kloska.[99]

Bartosz Romowicz

Bartosz Romowicz registered as a candidate on 10 December, despite not announcing his candidacy beforehand.[100] Romowicz began his political career in the Polish People's Party (PSL), formerly an electoral partner of Poland 2050 in the Third Way alliance. He was elected as the mayor of Ustrzyki Dolne in 2014, serving until 2023, when he became a member of the Sejm. He ran for a seat in the Sejm in 2011 and the Senate in 2019 on the lists of PSL, failing both bids, before joining Poland 2050 in 2021 and getting elected to the Sejm in 2023.

In an interview for Polskie Radio 24, Romowicz stated that Poland 2050 "[didn't] want to be a party about Szymon Hołownia", but one that "implements its program".[101]

Romowicz withdrew from the election on 9 January, a day prior to the first round.[23]

Candidates

Candidates in the second round

Candidate Born Political office Announced
Paulina Hennig-Kloska 		5 October 1977
Gniezno, Poland 		Minister of Climate and Environment (2023–present)
Member of the Sejm (2015–present) 		28 November 2025
Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz 		26 October 1970
Warsaw, Poland 		Minister of Funds and Regional Policy (2023–present) 21 November 2025

Candidates eliminated in the first round

Candidate Born Political office Announced
Rafał Kasprzyk 		27 August 1971
Busko-Zdrój, Poland 		Member of the Sejm (2023–present) 8 December 2025
Joanna Mucha 		12 April 1976
Płońsk, Poland 		Member of the Sejm (2007–present)
Minister of Sport and Tourism (2011–2013) 		29 October 2025
Ryszard Petru 		6 July 1972
Wrocław, Poland 		Member of the Sejm (2015–2019, 2023–present)
Leader of Modern (2015–2017) 		1 October 2025

Withdrawn candidates

Candidate Born Political office Announced Withdrew
Michał Kobosko 		15 April 1968
Płońsk, Poland 		Member of the European Parliament (2024–present)
Member of the Sejm (2023–2024)
Leader of the Poland 2050 (2020–2022) 		22 November 2025[e] 30 December 2025
Bartosz Romowicz 		14 June 1988
Lesko, Poland 		Member of the Sejm (2023–present) —[g] 9 January 2026

Media speculation

Media reported Hennig-Kloska, Kobosko, Mucha and Pełczyńska-Nałęcz as candidates for the election. It also speculated about a possible candidacy of Paweł Śliz, the chairman of the Poland 2050 parliamentary club, as a possible candidate for party leader, especially as an ally of Pełczyńska-Nałęcz if she chose not to contest.[102]

Endorsements

In an interview with Fakt, PL2050 posełs Norbert Pietrykowski and Ewa Szymanowska expressed their preferences for Petru and Kobosko, respectively. Most other members favoured Hennig-Kloska, Kobosko or Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[103] Party vice-chairman Michał Gramatyka stated that Paweł Śliz was the most fitting candidate for leader,[11] although he ultimately didn't run. Senator Jacek Trela endorsed Joanna Mucha.[104] PL2050 parliamentary club leader Paweł Śliz endorsed Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[105][85] Aleksandra Leo endorsed Hennig-Kloska.[106] Izabela Bodnar, a former poseł of the party, also endorsed Hennig-Kloska.[107]

Following his withdrawal before the first round, Kobosko expressed his support for Hennig-Kloska, Mucha and Petru.[69] In the second round, Petru,[99] Kasprzyk[66] and Mucha all endorsed Hennig-Kloska.[79] Shortly before the runoff, Szymon Hołownia sent an SMS message to party's politicians. According to Petru, the message stated that Hołownia supports neither of the runoff candidates, and hopes that party's camps would unite after the election.[108] He also published a letter stating his non-endorsement of any either candidate, but that he would vote for the candidate that would seek to preserve the party's autonomy. Regardless of no official endorsement, Newsweek states that this gesture was interpreted by party politicians as an endorsement of Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[5]

Opinion polls

An SW Research poll for Wprost conducted on 7 January 2026 among a sample of the general population asking for preferences for the election's winner found Petru with the highest support (14.2%), ahead of Mucha (8.9%), Pełczyńska-Nałęcz (7.9%), Hennig-Kloska (5.2%), Romowicz (3.3%), Kasprzyk (3.1%) and "someone else" (6.9%), although a majority — 50.5% of respondents — had no opinion.[109]

According to an Opinia24 poll for RMF FM, 27% of Poles wanted the party to have a Deputy Prime Minister, whereas 39% did not.[110]

Another SW Research poll for Wprost conducted on 20–21 January 2026 found that most respondents — 43.1% — believed Poland 2050 will disintegrate before the next (2027) parliamentary election, and only 23.4% believed otherwise.[111]

A Pollster poll for Super Express conducted on 26–27 January 2026 found that most respondents were pessimistic about the party's future, with 46% convinced the party won't survive without Hołownia, and 31% believing it could still function without its outgoing leader.[112]

Following the election, an SW Research poll for Onet conducted on 4 February 2026 found that 17.5% of respondents believed Pełczyńska-Nałęcz would be a good leader for Poland 2050, with 26.3% believing otherwise and others having no opinion.[113]

An Ariadna poll for Wirtualna Polska taken after the creation of Centre on 18–19 February 2026 found that 21% of respondents believed the formation of Centre was good, and 24% believed it was bad. According to the same poll, asking for who was to blame for the split in PL2050, 35% answered everyone was to blame, 17% blamed Hołownia, 9% blamed Pełczyńska-Nałęcz with her allies and 9% blamed Hennig-Kloska with her allies.[114]

Results

Leadership election

Candidate 1st round 2nd round
Vote % Vote %
Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz Y 277 42.23 350 53.27
Paulina Hennig-Kloska 131 19.97 307 46.73
Joanna Mucha 119 18.14 Eliminated
Ryszard Petru 95 14.48 Eliminated
Rafał Kasprzyk 34 5.18 Eliminated
Total 656 100.00 657 100.00
Source: Poland 2050[49][53]

National Board election

On 7 February, the party held an election for four seats to the National Board, which would become vice-chairs of the party.

Candidate 1st round 2nd round
Vote % Vote %
Paulina Hennig-Kloska Y ? ?
Rafał Kasprzyk Y ? ?
Sławomir Ćwik Y ? ?
Szymon Hołownia Y [h] ? [h] ?
Michał Koniuch [h] ? [h] ?
Source: Polish Press Agency[116]

Ćwik, Hennig-Kloska and Kasprzyk lost their positions shortly after, leaving Poland 2050 to form the Centre parliamentary group.

Conduct

Incidents in the first round

In the first round of the leadership election, 32 incidents of not receiving election emails were reported.[117] Onet reported that around 100 members were excluded from voting due to not paying the party membership fee, and raised concerns over the unverifiability of whether all of the votes in the first round came from actual party members.[118]

Annullment of the second round

Runoff voting took place between 16:00 and 22:00 on 12 January, and was to be announced within an hour afterwards. However, at night from 12 to 13 January 2026, the party announced that the runoff election has been invalidated because of technical difficulties,[119] with the election form closing at 21:00, an hour prior to the intended end. Party members also complained about not receiving links to the voting form, depriving them of the right to vote.[120] The party's executive board praised the election commission for "swiftly, responsibly, in accordance with procedures, immediately interrupting the voting and invalidating the second round without reading its results."[121] On 13 January, the party informed that it had notified the Internal Security Agency and the National Public Prosecutor's Office[122] of external interference in the electoral process, stating that it had received over 26,000[i] unanthorized votes.[121] On 15 January, the chief of the election commission, Maurycy Przyrowski, resigned from his post,[29] and was later replaced by Marta Cienkowska.[8]

A Business Insider investigation identified several issues that could have occurred in the second round of the election, investigating the Interankiety.pl survey service the election commission had used for the leadership election. One of the identified issues was the multiple answers option being enabled, which allowed for voters to vote for both candidates. Other possible problems included the survey passwords being disabled, a survey answer limit under some subscriptions to the service, or issues regarding the time period of the vote.[124] Interia suggested that party members sharing the link to the vote on social media on images or videos could have been responsible for the overflow from party non-affiliates attempting to sign in to the vote.[125]

Incidents regarding the 16–19 January National Council meeting

Following the annulment of the second round, outgoing leader Szymon Hołownia announced that he would call the party's National Council at the earliest possible date — 16 January at 18:30 CET[126] — one day earlier than previously scheduled (17 January),[23] to determine a new timetable regarding the election, and whether to repeat only the second round, or both rounds of the election.[24] Another concern during this period was the party leadership's term officially ending on 21 January, which could cause a legal dispute had new leadership not been elected by that point.[51]

The 16 January National Council meeting began at 18:30 CET, but ended early at ~23:00 after Hołownia abruptly left the meeting. Agnieszka Buczyńska took over the proceedings, declaring a break until 19 January at 18:00 CET.[127] According to TVN 24, Hołownia's departure was caused by "[the realization] that votes on certain issues were not going his way". During the meeting, Hołownia declared his support for repeating both rounds of the election, in which he would run for party leader. He also demanded that both Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and Hennig-Kloska be found in the party's National Board.[25]

Before the resumption of the National Council meeting on 19 January, Hołownia announced he was giving up responsibility for the party's decisions to Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and Hennig-Kloska,[128] ruling out running in the election.[61] Likewise before the meeting, Pełczyńska-Nałęcz issued a letter to the party offering Hennig-Kloska for both of the second-round candidates to co-lead the party by a decision of the National Council, although Hennig-Kloska rejected the idea.[51] The National Council ultimately decided to schedule the repeated second round for 31 January, with the National Board election scheduled for 7 February.[7][8] Hołownia did not participate in the resumed meeting.[129]

Controversies

Internal party conflict

The situation in the party during the election campaign was described as internally polarized between the camps of Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz's supporters and her opponents.[130][131] In early January, outgoing leader Szymon Hołownia described the election campaign as a destructive period in the party.[132] Later, he stated that the party became "unrecognizable" during the election period.[133]

The election campaign was marked by accusations of treason between the factions of the party. In December, Hołownia complained of a "szmalcownik" leaking the party's internal messages.[57] In early January, Hołownia accused Michał Kobosko of betraying the party by holding discussions with prime minister Donald Tusk without prior consultation with the party.[134] According to OKO.press, Bartosz Romowicz insinuated Ryszard Petru was leaking the party's information and "wishing ill upon the entire organization".[84] Later, on 23 January, Hołownia outright stated Petru was intentionally damaging the party, questioning why he remained in its ranks.[135]

It was speculated that the election would result in the secession of the losing faction from the party, with posełs leaving Poland 2050 for the Civic Coalition, Polish People's Party, Law and Justice, or creating their own party.[88][24][136] After the runoff on 12 January was annulled, both camps also openly accused each other of preparing a split or alining with other parties — Hennig-Kloska was accused of having an agreement with Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his liberal-conservative Civic Coalition, while Pełczyńska-Nałęcz was accused of planning an alliance with Adrian Zandberg and his left-wing Razem party for the next election.[137] Between 10 and 12 January, 10 posełs, supporters of Hołownia and Pełczyńska-Nałęcz — around 1/3rd of the party's parliamentary representation, including Hołownia himself — left the parliamentary group's Signal group chat.[134][138]

On 22 January, Aleksandra Leo was removed as co-chair of the party's parliamentary group, replaced by Bartosz Romowicz, after accusations that she had been planning a "putsch" in selecting the parliamentary group's National Council representation by conducting the vote to fill in the outgoing term without the presence of chairman Paweł Śliz.[139] Leo disputed these accusations.[140]

In an interview on 26 January, Hołownia stated that he would exit Poland 2050 if either Pełczyńska-Nałęcz or Hennig-Kloska took control over the party.[62]

Second round annullment disputes

According to Rzeczpospolita, following the annulment of the election, supporters of Hennig-Kloska alleged that the real reason for the invalidation of the runoff was because "Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and her camp realised that they were losing". Pełczyńska-Nałęcz supporters denounced the allegation as absurd.[137] Similarly, it was alleged by TVN 24 that the pausing of the 16 January National Council meeting was caused "[the realization] that votes on certain issues were not going [Szymon Hołownia's] way", and that Hołownia was using "emotional blackmail" to convince opponents to repeat both rounds of the election.[25]

External influence in the election

In a letter to the party a day before the 12 January runoff, Hołownia accused Poland 2050's allies of trying to destroy the party.[5] Throughout the election, Donald Tusk was accused of trying to influence the election by refusing to talk with Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[141][142] Tusk also privately praised Pełczyńska-Nałęcz's opponent, Hennig-Kloska.[134]

wPolityce.pl, a right-wing news outlet, accused other news outlets — Onet and TVN 24 — of attempting to interfere in the party's leadership election against Pełczyńska-Nałęcz.[143][144]

Following the runoff invalidation, the party notified the Internal Security Agency and the National Public Prosecutor's Office[122] of external interference in the electoral process, stating that it had received over 26,000[i] unauthorized votes.[121]

Analysis

Analysis of the election showed that whatever the outcome of the election turned out to be, Poland 2050 would have a difficult time becoming a significant political force in the country.[145][146]

Media speculation

Media speculated several possible flash points for the formal breakup between the party's two factions. Rzeczpospolita believed that the National Council meeting on 16 January could have led to a split between Hołownia and Pełczyńska-Nałęcz loyalists on one side, and the camp of Paulina Hennig-Kloska on the other.[137] Newsweek speculated that after the 12 January second round invalidation, any election result would cause a split in the party.[147] OKO.press likewise stated that the party could fall apart regardless of who wins the election.[61] The term of party leadership officially ending on 21 January caused concerns of a possible legal dispute had new leadership not been elected by that point, considering any decision regarding the subject had been delayed several times.[51]

After Hołownia declared his intention to leave the party if either candidate took control over the party, media speculated who else would leave the party with him. RMF FM speculated posełs Agnieszka Buczyńska, Adriana Porowska, Bartosz Romowicz, Kamil Wnuk and Łukasz Osmalak.[9] Interia presented a larger list of Buczyńska, Elżbieta Burkiewicz, Adam Gomoła, Piotr Górnikiewicz, Michał Gramatyka, Adam Luboński, Maja Nowak, Barbara Okuła, Osmalak, Romowicz, Piotr Strach, Paweł Śliz and Wnuk.[148]

Newsweek speculated Poland 2050 could possibly remove the Tusk government from power and form a new coalition with Law and Justice and the Confederation, placing Pełczyńska-Nałęcz as the new Prime Minister, but that she could have a difficult time convincing enough of the party's posełs to the idea.[149]

Aftermath

Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz emerged victorious. She announced her victory on twitter.[150][151] Paulina Hennig-Kloska issued a congratulatory statement the next day.[152] Pełczyńska-Nałęcz had her first press conference as party leader on 2 February, appearing alongside Hennig-Kloska,[153] who she endorsed for the party to elect to its National Board.[154] She also announced that she would not stop pursuing the position of Deputy Prime Minister, stating that her party affirmed her to the position several times.[155]

In the month following Pełczyńska-Nałęcz's victory, the party would suffer a major split. By 18 February, all of her opponents in the leadership election left the party. 15 MPs chose to form the Centre parliamentary group.[156][157]

Notes

  1. ^ The elected representatives were: Barbara Oliwiecka, Żaneta Cwalina-Śliwowska, Elżbieta Burkiewicz, Sławomir Ćwik, Szymon Hołownia, Marcin Skonieczka (Sejm) and Grzegorz Fedorowicz, Piotr Masłowski, Jacek Trela (Senate).[27]
  2. ^ Hołownia ended up losing the contest for the UN position to former Iraqi president Barham Ahmad Salih.[55]
  3. ^ The existence of the group chat was leaked on 23 January.[58]
  4. ^ The group chat included Marta Cienkowska, Aleksandra Leo, Adriana Porowska, Bartosz Romowicz (a candidate in the election), and Kamil Wnuk, among others.[58]
  5. ^ a b Kobosko announced his start to his supporters on 22 November at a teleconference, although media only officially began reporting on his decision on 25 November after a Polish Press Agency interview.
  6. ^ In October 2025, the Civic Coalition alliance united into a single party of the same name, leading to the dissolution of Modern.
  7. ^ Romowicz registered his candidacy on 10 December without announcing it beforehand.
  8. ^ a b c d According to Gazeta Wyborcza, Hołownia defeated Koniuch in a runoff by a difference of one vote after the two gained the same number of votes in the first round of the election.[115]
  9. ^ a b According to a tweet by Michał Gramatyka, the exact number of answers was 26,483.[123]

References

  1. ^ Kania, Daria (27 March 2022). "Polska 2050 Szymona Hołowni zaprezentowała władze partii". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 10 December 2025.
  2. ^ "Nowy zarząd partii wybrany!". Poland 2050. 21 January 2023. Retrieved 10 December 2025.
  3. ^ a b Statut Partii Polska 2050 Szymona Hołowni, 29 June 2024, retrieved 10 December 2025
  4. ^ Kryński, Eryk (10 January 2026). "Wybory lidera Polski 2050. Znamy wyniki pierwszej tury". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  5. ^ a b c Kim, Renata (12 January 2026). "W Polsce 2050 druga runda wyborów nowej przewodniczącej. W partii wrze, Hołownia wysyła list". Newsweek. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  6. ^ a b Kozłowski, Piotr (9 January 2026). "Wybory nowego lidera w cieniu publicznego prania brudów. Polska 2050 walczy o przetrwanie". Radio ZET. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  7. ^ a b c Boniecki, Marcin (19 January 2026). "Wiemy, co z powtórzeniem wyborów w Polsce 2050. Jest decyzja". Polsat News. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  8. ^ a b c d Szpyrka, Łukasz (27 January 2026). "Wybory w Polsce 2050 znów online. Partia podała datę". Interia. Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  9. ^ a b Wróblewski, Kacper (30 January 2026). "Kto odejdzie z Polski 2050? Ustalenia RMF FM". RMF FM. Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  10. ^ a b c Słomski, Damian (20 October 2025). "On chce zastąpić Szymona Hołownię. "Jestem w stanie poprowadzić partię do zwycięstwa"". Business Insider. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  11. ^ a b Michalski, Szymon (3 December 2025). "Kto nowym liderem Polski 2050? Wiceminister wskazał jedno nazwisko". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 3 December 2025.
  12. ^ a b "O północy mija termin zgłaszania kandydatów na szefa Polski 2050". portalsamrozadowy.pl. 10 December 2025. Retrieved 10 December 2025.
  13. ^ Kolanko, Michał (23 November 2025). "Prawdziwa walka o Polskę 2050. Stawka większa niż fotel szefa partii". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  14. ^ Przyborska, Katarzyna (14 December 2025). "Polska 2050 w politycznym niebycie. Kto wykorzysta masę upadłościową?". TVP Info. Retrieved 15 December 2025.
  15. ^ "Jest oficjalna lista kandydatów na szefa Polski 2050". TVN 24. 11 December 2025. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  16. ^ Długosz, Dominika (19 October 2025). "Chce być następczynią Hołowni. Tusk ma z nią poważny problem. "Nie umie w gry zespołowe"". Newsweek Polska. Retrieved 19 October 2025.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  17. ^ a b Ciszewski, Filip (9 January 2026). "Walka o władzę w Polsce 2050. Hennig-Kloska: Hołownia nie powiedział ostatniego słowa". Polskie Radio Program I. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  18. ^ Starużyk, Kasper (10 January 2026). "Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz i Paulina Hennig-Kloska w II turze wyborów szefa Polski 2050". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 10 January 2026.
  19. ^ Kazimierczuk, Agnieszka (31 January 2026). "Polska 2050 wybrała. Pełczyńska-Nałęcz następczynią Hołowni". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 31 January 2026.
  20. ^ a b Dziubka, Kamil (5 January 2026). "Nerwowo w partii Szymona Hołowni. "To rozgrywka z Tuskiem"". Onet. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  21. ^ Sieńkowski, Dawid (8 January 2026). ""Specjalni obserwatorzy". Nowe doniesienia ws. wyborów w Polsce 2050". Do Rzeczy. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  22. ^ "Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz nową przewodniczącą Polski 2050". TVN 24. 1 February 2026. Retrieved 1 February 2026.
  23. ^ a b c Niezgoda, Karolina (9 January 2026). "Bartosz Romowicz zrezygnował ze startu w wyborach na przewodniczącego Polski 2050". TVP 3. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  24. ^ a b c Drabik, Piotr (13 January 2026). "Kolejny zwrot w sprawie wyborów w Polsce 2050. Nowa deklaracja Hołowni" (in Polish). Fakt. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  25. ^ a b c d Michalski, Patryk (16 January 2026). "Burzliwy koniec obrad Polski 2050. Hołownia się nagle wylogował". TVN 24. Retrieved 17 January 2026.
  26. ^ Zygiel, Adam (22 January 2026). ""Spektakularny upadek". Komentarze wokół sporu w Polsce 2050". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  27. ^ "Rada Krajowa Polski 2050 z nowym składem. Ministra podała nazwiska". Onet. 6 February 2026. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  28. ^ "Wojna w Polsce 2050. Padły oskarżenia o "próbę puczu". Wiceszefowa klubu wyrzucona ze stanowiska". Onet. 22 January 2026. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  29. ^ a b Idziak, Patryk (15 January 2026). "Zwrot w Polsce 2050 przed wskazaniem lidera. Szef komisji wyborczej podał się do dymisji". Polsat News. Retrieved 16 January 2026.
  30. ^ "Hołownia największym przegranym? W sondażu za Braunem i Zandbergiem". 19 May 2025. Retrieved 20 May 2025.
  31. ^ "Koniec Trzeciej Drogi". TVN24 (in Polish). 17 June 2025.
  32. ^ Białach, Sebastian (10 July 2025). "Polityczny kryzys w Polsce 2050. Doły partyjne podzielone w ocenie Szymona Hołowni". Onet. Retrieved 1 October 2025.
  33. ^ "Tomasz Zimoch o odejściu z Polski 2050. "Nie na to się umawiałem z marszałkiem Hołownią"". 5 August 2025. Retrieved 6 August 2025.
  34. ^ "Kryzys w Polsce 2050. Posłanka składa rezygnację z członkostwa w partii". 8 July 2025. Retrieved 20 July 2025.
  35. ^ ""Dlaczego Szymek wziął tak duży kredyt?". "Brutalna prawda" o długach Polski 2050 [DZIEJE SIĘ]". TOK FM. 4 October 2025. Retrieved 5 October 2025.
  36. ^
  37. ^ a b Lewicki, Bartosz (27 September 2025). "Ważne oświadczenie Szymona Hołowni. "To ten moment, ta chwila"". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 28 September 2025.
  38. ^ Malinowski, Przemysław (29 September 2025). "Szymon Hołownia chce pożegnać się z polityką. Jego plan zakłada zgodę rządu i prezydenta". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 29 September 2025.
  39. ^
  40. ^ Dziubka, Kamil (2 October 2025). "Ferment w partii Szymona Hołowni. "To pójście na wojnę z Tuskiem"". Onet. Retrieved 3 October 2025.
  41. ^ Ciesielska, Paulina (28 November 2025). ""Podjęłam decyzję". Hennig-Kloska potwierdziła swój start". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 28 November 2025.
  42. ^ a b "Polska 2050 z nową kandydatką. Hennig-Kloska potwierdza decyzję". Polskie Radio 24. 28 November 2025. Retrieved 28 November 2025.
  43. ^ Gruszczyńska, Aleksandra (5 January 2026). "Wewnętrzne spory w Polsce 2050. Ministra wbiła szpilę partyjnej koleżance". TOK FM. Retrieved 5 January 2026.
  44. ^ Terlikowski, Tomasz; Pośpiech, Łukasz (15 January 2026). "Ingerencja w wybory na szefa Polski 2050? "Złożymy zawiadomienie do prokuratury"". RMF FM. Retrieved 15 January 2026.
  45. ^ Paulina Hennig-Kloska, archived from the original on 9 January 2026, retrieved 4 January 2026
  46. ^ a b c d Dolak, Mateusz (3 January 2026). "Zawarli sojusz wyborczy. Chcą zablokować Pełczyńską-Nałęcz". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 4 January 2026.
  47. ^ Adamczyk, Magda; Zaborski, Marcin (5 December 2025). "Hennig-Kloska o szczycie u prezydenta: Ja bym poszła. To ważna dla obywateli dyskusja". Radio Zet. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  48. ^ "Kto zostanie szefem Polski 2050?". Radio Maryja. 12 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  49. ^ a b c d e f First round: UCHWAŁA NR 3/2026KRAJOWEJ KOMISJI WYBORCZEJ PARTII POLSKA 2050 SZYMONA HOŁOWNI, Poland 2050, 10 January 2026, archived from the original on 8 February 2026, retrieved 8 February 2026
  50. ^ Dziubka, Kamil (12 January 2026). "Burza w Polsce 2050. Oskarżenia o zdradę przed kluczową rozgrywką". Onet. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  51. ^ a b c d e f Kim, Renata (19 January 2026). "Polska 2050 przepaścią. Paulina Hennig-Kloska odrzuciła ofertę rywalki". Newsweek Polska. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  52. ^ Kolanko, Michał (20 January 2026). "Paulina Hennig-Kloska przejmie władzę w Polsce 2050 i zostanie wicepremierką". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 20 January 2026.
  53. ^ a b c Second round: UCHWAŁA NR 3101/01/2026 KRAJOWEJ KOMISJI WYBORCZEJ PARTII POLSKA 2050 SZYMONA HOŁOWNI, Poland 2050, 31 January 2026, archived from the original on 8 February 2026, retrieved 8 February 2026
  54. ^ "Szymon Hołownia jednak pozostanie liderem Polski 2050? "Jest 30 proc. szans"". Onet. 8 October 2025. Retrieved 10 October 2025.
  55. ^ "Pokonał Szymona Hołownię i został Wysokim Komisarzem ONZ. Miał bardzo burzliwe życie". Onet. 12 December 2025. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  56. ^ Terlikowski, Tomasz; Paluszek, Anna (24 October 2025). "Zwrot akcji w sprawie Hołowni? Kobosko: Myślę, że to rozważa". RMF FM. Retrieved 24 January 2026.
  57. ^ a b Dziubka, Kamil (10 December 2025). "Szymon Hołownia do końca się wahał. Kulisy rezygnacji". Onet. Retrieved 24 January 2026.
  58. ^ a b c Stankiewicz, Andrzej (23 January 2026). "Tajemniczy czat z Hołownią. Ujawniamy korespondencję, która rozsadziła Polskę 2050". Onet. Retrieved 24 January 2026.
  59. ^ "Nieoczekiwany zwrot akcji. Hołownia rozważa kandydowanie na szefa Polski 2050". TOK FM. 13 January 2026. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  60. ^ Wróblewski, Michał (16 January 2026). "Polska 2050 nie chce Szymona Hołowni. "Jest przegrany"". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 16 January 2026.
  61. ^ a b c Szczęśniak, Agata (19 January 2026). "Polska 2050. Czy to game over? Co zobaczymy w kolejnych odcinkach? [SCENARIUSZE]". OKO.press. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  62. ^ a b Pokorski, Artur (26 January 2026). ""Wojna domowa" w Polsce 2050. Hołownia o kulisach kryzysu w partii". Polsat News. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  63. ^ Zygiel, Adam (26 January 2026). "Kryzys w Polsce 2050. Hołownia stawia ultimatum". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  64. ^ a b Białach, Sebastian (8 December 2025). "Nowy kandydat w wyborach na szefa Polski 2050". Onet. Retrieved 10 December 2025.
  65. ^ Główka, Dominika (8 January 2026). "Zmiany w Polsce 2050 coraz bliżej. "Nie musimy się zgadzać"". Polskie Radio 24. Retrieved 9 January 2026.
  66. ^ a b "Polska 2050 przed kluczowym wyborem. 12 stycznia poznamy następcę Szymona Hołowni". Onet. 12 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  67. ^ a b c d Starużyk, Kasper (25 November 2025). "Pojawił się kandydat na nowego szefa Polski 2050. Planuje start w wyborach". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 27 November 2025.
  68. ^ Wasilewska, Aneta (10 December 2025). "Z Hołownią to już pewne. Kobosko: będzie nowe otwarcie". Polskie Radio Program I. Retrieved 12 December 2025.
  69. ^ a b "Michał Kobosko rezygnuje ze startu na szefa Polski 2050". Onet. 30 December 2025. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
  70. ^ "Polska 2050 szuka lidera. Kolejna osoba ogłasza swój start". Wprost. 29 October 2025. Retrieved 30 October 2025.
  71. ^ ""Ja i Platforma jesteśmy w innym miejscu". Mucha przechodzi do ruchu Hołowni". TVN 24. 20 January 2021. Retrieved 30 October 2025.
  72. ^ Markowski, Krzysztof (3 October 2025). "Mucha chciałaby Sterczewskiego w Polsce 2050? "On ciąży w innym kierunku"". TOK FM. Retrieved 30 October 2025.
  73. ^ a b Gruszczyński, Arkadiusz (30 October 2025). "Joanna Mucha chce przejąć od Szymona Hołowni Polskę 2050. "Jestem gotowa"". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 30 October 2025.
  74. ^ Malinowski, Przemysław (20 November 2025). "Joanna Mucha: Polska 2050 za dużo straciła na współpracy z PSL. Sami mogliśmy osiągnąć lepszy wynik". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 20 November 2025.
  75. ^ Ćwiek-Świdecka, Joanna (27 November 2025). "Joanna Mucha: Trzecia Droga to był zły pomysł, powinniśmy od razu startować sami". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 27 November 2025.
  76. ^ "Joanna Mucha zamierza wystartować w wyborach na przewodniczącą Polski 2050". TVN 24. 29 October 2025. Retrieved 30 October 2025.
  77. ^ Szpala, Iwona (10 November 2025). "Wybory w partiach koalicji. W PSL "wszyscy kochają Władka", w KO "szef jest jeden"". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 10 November 2025.
  78. ^ Stawiany, Jacek (2 January 2026). "Co dalej z Polską 2050? "Sondaże na poziomach homeopatycznych"". TOK FM. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
  79. ^ a b "Polska 2050 wybiera nową przewodniczącą. Kogo poprze Joanna Mucha?". Onet. 12 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  80. ^ a b Węsierski, Tadeusz (21 November 2025). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz chce zastąpić Hołownię. Ministra ogłosiła decyzję". 24. Retrieved 22 November 2025.
  81. ^ a b Treder, Bartosz (25 November 2025). "Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz dla Onetu: to jest test dla koalicji [WYWIAD]". Onet. Retrieved 6 December 2025.
  82. ^ a b Osiecki, Grzegorz; Żółciak, Tomasz (16 December 2025). "Ministra ujawnia: Polska zmniejsza pulę pożyczek z KPO. Oto liczby". Money.pl. Retrieved 16 December 2025.
  83. ^ Zakrzewski, Sebastian (12 January 2026). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz o swojej "wizji" na Polskę 2050 i jej "DNA"". TVN 24. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  84. ^ a b c Sitnicka, Dominika; Szczęśniak, Agata (12 January 2026). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz czy Hennig-Kloska? Brutalna walka o ocalenie partii Hołowni". OKO.press. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  85. ^ a b c Kolanko, Michał (17 December 2025). "Jaka ma być Polska 2050? Walka o przywództwo, kierunek i miejsce w koalicji". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
  86. ^ Sławiński, Jacek; Ploch, Miłosz (1 January 2026). "Co dalej z Polską 2050? "Tusk gra z tym środowiskiem w pewną grę"". Fakt. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
  87. ^ Gruszczyński, Arkadiusz (27 November 2025). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz czeka od miesiąca na spotkanie z Tuskiem. Polska 2050 na zakręcie przed wewnętrznymi wyborami". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 28 November 2025.
  88. ^ a b Stankiewicz, Andrzej (11 December 2025). "Koalicji grozi kryzys. Może stracić większość w Sejmie". Onet. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  89. ^ Drabik, Piotr (11 December 2025). "Tli się bunt w Polsce 2050. "Podobnie było z Nowoczesną"". Fakt. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  90. ^ "Hołowni "wrócił polityczny błysk do oka"". TVN 24. 7 December 2025. Retrieved 8 December 2025.
  91. ^ Żółciak, Tomasz (22 January 2026). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz pisze do działaczy: "za chwilę z Polski 2050 nie zostanie cegła na cegle"". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  92. ^ Tomasik, Michał (10 January 2026). "Wybory w Polsce 2050. Kto przejmie władzę po Hołowni? Okaże się w drugiej turze". Polityka. Retrieved 10 January 2026.
  93. ^ Krause, Alicja (3 October 2025). ""Ludzie za tym pójdą". Petru obiecuje skok w sondażach". Polsat News. Retrieved 5 October 2025.
  94. ^ Kowarczyk, Adrian (20 October 2025). "Petru: jestem w stanie poprowadzić Polskę 2050 do sukcesu w wyborach". Polish Press Agency. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
  95. ^ a b Nizinkiewicz, Jacek (11 October 2025). "Ryszard Petru: Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz nie powinna zostać wicepremierem. Zapraszam na debatę". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 11 October 2025.
  96. ^ "Ryszard Petru rejestruje swoją kandydaturę na przewodniczącego Polski 2050". Onet. 17 November 2025. Retrieved 19 November 2025.
  97. ^ Białach, Sebastian (1 October 2025). "Szymon Hołownia odchodzi, Polska 2050 w szoku. "Proces rozkładu już się zaczął"". Onet. Retrieved 5 October 2025.
  98. ^ Hilger, Dorota (22 December 2025). "Petru stworzył "zarząd", podał nazwiska. "Z większością nie rozmawiałem"". Interia. Retrieved 22 December 2025.
  99. ^ a b "Wybory w Polsce 2050. Ryszard Petru zdradził, kogo poprze w II turze". Onet. 10 January 2026. Retrieved 10 January 2026.
  100. ^ Kozłowski, Piotr (11 December 2025). "Sześciu? Już nieaktualne. Jest siódmy kandydat na przewodniczącego Polski 2050. I ważne stanowisko". Radio ZET. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  101. ^ Ciszewski, Filip (18 December 2025). "Przyszłość Polski 2050. Romowicz: jeden lider nie jest w stanie połamać sumienia". Polskie Radio 24. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  102. ^
  103. ^ Drabik, Piotr (12 October 2025). "Posłowie Polski 2050 wskazali następcę Hołowni. Dominowały dwa nazwiska". Fakt. Retrieved 15 October 2025.
  104. ^ Michalak, Paweł (12 December 2025). "Przyszłość Polski 2050. Trela: w 2027 roku chcemy być pełnowartościowym koalicjantem". Polskie Radio Program III. Retrieved 12 December 2025.
  105. ^ Śliz, Paweł [@SlizPawel] (15 December 2025). "Kierowanie Klubem Parlamentarnym @PL_2050,..." (Tweet). Retrieved 16 December 2025 – via X (formerly Twitter).
  106. ^ "Polska 2050 wybiera przewodniczącą. Jasna deklaracja posłanki. "Ma mój głos"". Onet. 31 January 2026. Retrieved 31 January 2026.
  107. ^ Roldan, Robert Fonte (12 January 2026). "Odeszła z partii Hołowni, teraz wskazuje swoją faworytkę. "Zmieni strategię"". Fakt. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  108. ^ Michalski, Szymon (12 January 2026). "Hołownia wysłał im SMS przed II turą wyborów. Petru zdradza treść". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  109. ^ Krawiec, Szymon (8 January 2026). "Kto powinien pokierować Polską 2050? Polacy wybrali następcę Hołowni". Wprost. Retrieved 8 January 2026. Według Agencji Badań Rynku i Opinii SW Research, której zleciliśmy takie badanie, najlepiej wypadł Ryszard Petru. 14,2 proc. ankietowanych widziałoby go w tej roli. Na drugim miejscu uplasowała się Joanna Mucha (8,9 proc.), a podium zamknęła Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz (7,9 proc.). Na kolejnych miejscach wylądowali: Paulina Hennig-Kloska (5,2 proc.), Bartosz Romowicz (3,3 proc.) i Rafał Kasprzyk (3,1 proc.). 6,9 proc. badanych w fotelu przewodniczącego Polski 2050 widziałoby natomiast kogoś zupełnie innego. A aż 50,5 proc. nie ma w ogóle w sprawie następcy Hołowni zdania. To najlepiej pokazuje, jakim zainteresowaniem cieszy się dzisiaj to ugrupowanie wśród zwykłych Polaków. Badanie zostało zrealizowane 7 stycznia 2025 roku przez agencję SW Research metodą wywiadów on-line na panelu internetowym SW Panel. W ramach badania przeprowadzono 808 wywiadów z reprezentatywną ze względu na łączny rozkład płci, wieku i wielkość miejscowości próbą Polek i Polaków powyżej 18. roku życia.
  110. ^ Pajączek, Katarzyna (19 January 2026). "Sondaż RMF FM: Polacy nie chcą wicepremiera z Polski 2050. Kto jest przeciw?". RMF FM. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  111. ^ Frindt, Magdalena (22 January 2026). "Polacy wydali "wyrok" na Polskę 2050. Wieszczą czarny scenariusz. Sondaż dla "Wprost"". Wprost. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  112. ^ Fakhriddinova, Weronnika (30 January 2026). "Co czeka Polskę 2050, gdy zabraknie Hołowni? Wyniki mocno dają do myślenia". Super Express. Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  113. ^ "Złe wieści dla Katarzyny Pełczyńskiej-Nałęcz. Zdecydowana ocena Polaków [SONDAŻ]". Onet. 6 February 2026. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  114. ^ Szewczuk, Katarzyna (20 February 2026). "Kto jest winny rozpadu Polski 2050? Mamy wynik badania". Wirtualna Polska. Retrieved 20 February 2026.
  115. ^ Szpala, Iwona (8 February 2026). "Wybory w Polska 2050. Szymon Hołownia z nową rolą. Wygrał o włos, z własnym kierowcą". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 8 February 2026.
  116. ^ Torz, Michał; Barej, Patryk (8 February 2026). "Polska 2050 chce walczyć o głosy jako „wyraziste centrum". Jakie projekty zapowiedziała?". Polish Press Agency. Retrieved 8 February 2026.
  117. ^ "Wybory przewodniczącego Polski 2050. Są 32 protesty wyborcze". Onet. 10 January 2026. Retrieved 10 January 2026.
  118. ^ Białach, Sebastian (12 January 2026). "Nieprawidłowości w wyborach szefa Polski 2050. "Powinny być unieważnione"". Onet. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  119. ^ Gądek, Piotr (13 January 2026). "Głosowanie na szefową Polski 2050 unieważnione" (in Polish). RFM FM. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  120. ^ Kim, Renata (13 January 2026). "Działacze Polski 2050 żądają dymisji. "Partia, która łamie standardy demokratyczne"". Newsweek Polska. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  121. ^ a b c Stępień, Marta (13 January 2026). "Polska 2050 alarmuje ABW i prokuraturę. "Próba ingerencji w proces wyborczy"" (in Polish). Polsat News. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  122. ^ a b Kobos, Karol (16 January 2026). "Dziś Rada Krajowa Polski 2050 zdecyduje, co z wyborami szefa partii. Hołownia wróci do gry?". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 16 January 2026.
  123. ^ Gramatyka, Michał [@McGramat] (14 January 2026). "Zakłócenie działalności systemu informatycznego..." (Tweet) (in Polish). Retrieved 14 January 2026 – via X (formerly Twitter). Zakłócenie działalności systemu informatycznego jest w Polsce przestepstwem. Podobnie jak samo uzyskanie dostępu do tego systemu bez stosownych uprawnień. Obie sytuację potwierdza w mailu do nas firma przeprowadzająca głosowanie. Pisałem już wczoraj że jako @PL_2050 jesteśmy sami sobie winni - bo to my wybraliśmy taki a nie inny sposób przeprowadzenia wyborów. O udostępnianiu zdjęć, filmów i linków przez grzeczność nie wspomnę. Ale KTOŚ wykonał te nieuprawnione logowania, KTOŚ zbombardował tysiącami wywołań bazę danych Interankiet. Wreszcie KTOŚ ma dziś ubaw po pachy z tego co się w infosferze dzieje. Ja sobie grzecznie usiądę nad rzeką. Mam nadzieję że nigdy nie doczekam NAPRAWDĘ POWAŻNYCH problemów wynikających z bagatelizowania takich sytuacji jak nasze głosowanie. Pytanie „Qui bono" pozostawiam już Państwu. [Image text: Answers 26483/1000]
  124. ^ Gołąbiowski, Łukasz (13 January 2026). "Dotarliśmy do narzędzia, z którego korzystała Polska 2050. Za wszystkim mógł stać podstawowy błąd". Business Insider. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  125. ^ Szpyrka, Łukasz (13 January 2026). "Wiemy, co stało się w głosowaniu partii Hołowni. Mamy wyniki analizy" (in Polish). Interia. Retrieved 14 January 2026.
  126. ^ Olech, Michał (14 January 2026). ""Rozważane są dwie propozycje"". 300polityka.pl. Retrieved 14 January 2026.
  127. ^ "Kulisy piątkowych obrad Polski 2050. "Szymon Hołownia nagle się wylogował"". Onet. 17 January 2026. Retrieved 17 January 2026.
  128. ^ "Wybory lidera w Polsce 2050. "Przekazałem wiadomość"". TVP Info. 19 January 2026. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  129. ^ "Kluczowe spotkanie Rady Krajowej Polski 2050 bez Szymona Hołowni. "Fatalne nastroje"". Onet. 19 January 2026. Retrieved 20 January 2026.
  130. ^ "Nieformalny sojusz wyborczy w Polsce 2050. Chcą zablokować Pełczyńską-Nałęcz". TOK FM. 3 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  131. ^ Nowakowska, Karolina (12 January 2026). "Kto zastąpi Szymona Hołownię? Pełczyńska-Nałęcz vs Hennig-Kloska w finale wyborów". Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  132. ^ "List Hołowni do polityków Polski 2050. "Wybiorę kogoś, kto mocno postawi na autonomię naszej partii"". TVN 24. 12 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  133. ^ Nicz, Anna (23 January 2026). "Kryzys w Polsce 2050. Pilna narada liderów partii". Polsat News. Retrieved 23 January 2026.
  134. ^ a b c Szpala, Iwona (12 January 2026). "Gorąco w Polsce 2050. Hołownia oskarżył Koboskę o zdradę partii". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  135. ^ Nicz, Anna (23 January 2026). "Hołownia uderza w polityka Polski 2050. "Powinien opuścić partię"". Polsat News. Retrieved 23 January 2026.
  136. ^ Lewicki, Bartosz (7 October 2025). "Co najmniej sześcioro posłów Polski 2050 chce przejść do PSL". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 8 October 2025.
  137. ^ a b c Kolanko, Michał (13 January 2026). "Wstrząs w Polsce 2050. Czy Szymon Hołownia wróci jednak do gry?" (in Polish). Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  138. ^ Synowiec, Tomasz (13 January 2026). "Hołownia potwierdza opuszczenie grupy Polski 2050 na Signalu". 300polityka.pl. Retrieved 13 January 2026.
  139. ^ Idziak, Patryk (22 January 2026). ""Opamiętajcie się". Grzmi w Polsce 2050, Hołownia podkreśla: To nadal moja partia". Polsat News. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  140. ^ "Leo o odwołanu jej z funkcji wiceszefowej Polski 2050: nie widzę tu logiki". Polish Press Agency. 22 January 2026. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  141. ^ Gruszczyński, Arkadiusz (27 November 2025). "Pełczyńska-Nałęcz czeka od miesiąca na spotkanie z Tuskiem. Polska 2050 na zakręcie przed wewnętrznymi wyborami". Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  142. ^ Kalukin, Rafał (20 January 2026). "Kabaret Polska 2050. To się może skończyć rozbiorem. Koalicję czeka gruntowna przebudowa". Polityka. Retrieved 20 January 2026.
  143. ^ Janecki, Stanisław (11 December 2025). "Historyczną misją Polski 2050 jest wyłącznie bycie podnóżkiem lub wycieraczką Donalda Tuska – dlatego Onet wybiera jej szefa". wPolityce.pl. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  144. ^ "Zaostrza się walka o władzę w Polsce 2050! Pełczyńska-Nałęcz alarmuje o próbie ingerencji w wybory partyjne. W tle TVN24". wPolityce.pl. 9 January 2026. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  145. ^ "Ważą się losy tej partii? "To jest wszystko ściema"". TOK FM. 12 January 2026. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  146. ^ Kalukin, Rafał (14 January 2026). "Osieroceni. Polska 2050 wydaje się dziś zbędna. Czy powrót z dna jest jeszcze możliwy?". Polityka. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  147. ^ Długosz, Dominika (14 January 2026). "Po Polsce 2050 został tylko sejmowy klub. Ale i on niebawem może przestać istnieć [ANALIZA]". Newsweek Polska. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  148. ^ Szpyrka, Łukasz (26 January 2026). "Tajemnicza "13" Szymona Hołowni. Znamy nazwiska". Interia. Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  149. ^ Długosz, Dominika; Gądek, Jacek (26 January 2026). "Czy Polska 2050 będzie chciała dogadać się z PiS-em? "Wszystko może się zdarzyć"". Newsweek Polska. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  150. ^ Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, Katarzyna [@Kpelczynska] (31 January 2026). "Dziękuję za zaufanie ludziom..." (Tweet) (in Polish). Retrieved 31 January 2026 – via X (formerly Twitter). Dziękuję za zaufanie ludziom @PL_2050 . Dziękuję wszystkim, którzy wzięli udział w głosowaniu (frekwencja 94%!). Poprowadzę nas do przodu z wizją i odwagą. We współpracy z @szymon_holownia i @hennigkloska
  151. ^ Sławiński, Marek (31 January 2026). "Polska 2050 wybrała przewodniczącą. Znamy wyniki". Fakt. Retrieved 31 January 2026.
  152. ^ Stelmach, Waldemar (1 February 2026). "Polska 2050 z nową szefową. Paulina Hennig-Kloska zabrała głos". RMF FM. Retrieved 1 February 2026.
  153. ^ Krzywiecki, Jakub (2 February 2026). "Pierwsze oficjalne wystąpienie nowej szefowej Polski 2050. Ogłosiła decyzje". Polsat News. Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  154. ^ Sarna, Jakub (3 February 2026). "Jest nowy zarząd Polski 2050. Pełczyńska-Nałęcz podała nazwiska". RMF FM. Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  155. ^ Czermiński, Jakub (2 February 2026). "Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz: Polska 2050 pozostanie w koalicji rządzącej". Rzeczpospolita. Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  156. ^ Partyła, Magdalena (18 February 2026). "To już koniec. Polska 2050 się rozpada". RMF FM. Retrieved 18 February 2026.
  157. ^ Tomasik, Michał (18 February 2026). "Polska 2050 dzieli się na pół. Tę kłótnię koalicja rządowa przetrwa, ale co wydarzy się dalej?". Polityka. Retrieved 18 February 2026.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.