2025 Czech government Bitcoin scandal

The 2025 Czech government Bitcoin scandal was a controversy in the Czech Republic regarding a Bitcoin donation to the country's Ministry of Justice. The independent Czech daily newspaper and digital content outlet Deník N[1] reported that minister Pavel Blažek had accepted a Bitcoin donation, worth roughly one billion Czech Koruna at the time (approximately $45,000,000 USD),[2] from Tomáš Jiřikovský, who had been convicted of embezzlement, drug trafficking, and illegal possession of weapons in 2017.[2][3][4][5]

After being released early from prison in 2021, Jiřikovský attempted to recover the Bitcoin wallets, which had grown more valuable during his time in prison. Specifically, in 2023, he hired a lawyer acquainted with the Justice Minister to recover the devices containing the wallets, which had previously been seized in 2016.[6] Deník N reported the suspicious bitcoin transfer to the Czech Ministry of Justice in 2025[7] and the Ministry was notified by the donor’s lawyer on 26 May 2025, at the latest, that the bitcoin had been seized.[8]

Justice Minister Pavel Blažek, a member of the Civic Democratic Party, resigned on 31 May 2025. Blažek stated that he had approved the donation without verifying its origin but denied that his actions were illegal.[9] The donation was not returned.

On 18 June 2025, 98 of the 192 MPs[5] voted to oppose a no-confidence motion against the government of Prime Minister Petr Fiala, which was filed by the opposition party ANO. This made it the fourth no-confidence vote that the Fiala government survived since entering power in 2021.[10]

Background

The controversy centers around a donation of 468 bitcoin made to the Czech Ministry of Justice by Tomáš Jiříkovský, a convicted criminal known for operating the dark web marketplace Sheep Marketplace, which was used for illegal transactions.[11][12] Jiříkovský was convicted in 2017 for offenses including embezzlement, drug trafficking, and illegal arms possession. After his release from prison in 2021, he sought to reclaim the bitcoin that had been seized during his arrest. Later, he donated 30% of these assets to the Ministry of Justice.[13][14][15][16]

Public disclosure

The case was uncovered by Zdislava Pokorná from Deník N, who published an article on 28 May 2025 listing Tomáš Jiřikovský among the wealthiest Czechs, with an estimated net worth of approximately two billion Czech koruna (CZK).[17] Jiřikovský was released from prison in 2021 after serving part of a nine-year sentence for embezzlement, illegal arms possession, and drug trafficking. He operated Sheep Marketplace, a darknet platform for drug sales, facilitating transactions involving various illicit substances. Sheep Marketplace used bitcoin as currency, which kept vendors and consumers pseudonymous. Jiřikovský earned substantial profits through commissions on each transaction. While running the marketplace, he was defrauded of 5,400 bitcoins by Nathan Gibson and Sean Mackert, who exploited a vulnerability in the marketplace's source code.[18] In December 2013, they managed to steal nearly 841 Bitcoins from buyers and sellers on the platform,[19] equivalent to over 16 million Czech koruna at that time, or around 22–24 million Czech koruna in 2025.

Jiřikovský's sentence

In 2017, a court sentenced Jiřikovský to nine years in prison for embezzlement, drug trafficking, and illegal possession of firearms. He was released for good behavior after serving half of his sentence (specifically four years, seven months, and seven days). On 19 November 2020, Břeclav District Court granted his request for conditional release, establishing a six-year probation period ending in November 2026.[20]

Return of Computing Equipment

Since 2021, legal proceedings have been underway regarding seized electronics. Initially, the Krajský soud v Brně and the Vrchní soud v Olomouci ruled that the hardware should be returned, but only after its contents were wiped. This was intended to prevent Jiřikovský from profiting from any Bitcoins he might regain access to through the data on the devices. However, in 2023, Supreme Court of the Czech Republic overturned this, ruling that the data should not be deleted.[21] The court held that if it cannot be proven beyond doubt that the computers contain Bitcoins obtained through suspicious means, Jiřikovský is entitled to the return of the devices in their original state.

In January 2025, Krajský soud v Brně issued a final ruling to return the main portion of the hardware to Jiřikovský without formatting it, after Jiřikovský claimed he had forgotten the passwords to the computers.[22] The court ordered the wiping of only three laptops and one data storage device (an external drive) where experts determined he could have gained access to crypto-wallets. Eight encrypted devices were returned intact, including two encrypted computers, three phones, and three tablets.[23] A total of approximately 30 devices were returned.[24]

Upon the return of the technology, Jiřikovský also regained access to cryptocurrency wallets containing assets other than Bitcoin. Specifically, he accessed Bitcoin Cash valued at 16 million CZK at the time. The official notary record of the Bitcoin handover contained no mention of these alternative cryptocurrencies.[25]

Bitcoin Donation Agreement

The initial correspondence from attorney Kárim Titz, containing an offer of bitcoins, reached the Ministry in mid-August 2023. It was received by Deputy Minister Antonín Stanislav (ODS), who subsequently resigned in the spring of 2024 following a series of unrelated allegations. The attorney proposed the transfer of high-value bitcoins to the Czech Republic on the condition that the state return seized hardware to Jiřikovský. Titz argued that Jiřikovský had already completed his sentence for operating the illegal darknet market Sheep Marketplace, his assets had been forfeited, and the police had failed to establish that the bitcoins stored on his computer were proceeds of crime (an argument later echoed by Minister Blažek). At that time, law enforcement was unaware of any connection between Jiřikovský and the Nucleus marketplace.[26]

In mid-December 2024, Karel Dvořák—the Political Deputy to Minister Blažek and Vice-Chairman of Mayors and Independents (STAN) movement—received an official email as part of his duties at the Ministry of Justice addressing a previously submitted offer by attorney Titz regarding a Bitcoin donation to the state. The response from the Deputy, and by extension the Minister, stated that under the law, the hardware containing the cryptocurrencies could only be released to Jiřikovský by a court, and that the Ministry is prohibited from interfering with judicial proceedings.[27]

As early as January 2025, Titz suggested in email to Ministry of the Interior employees that the funds in question might not be entirely legitimate.[28] Legal experts from the Ministry of Finance subsequently drafted a formal warning on 12 February 2025 in response to documents received from the Ministry of Justice regarding a proposed donation agreement with Jiřikovský. The legal opinion cautioned that the donation could represent a moral hazard, that the bitcoins might originate from criminal activity, and that the contract could serve as a pretext for money laundering. However, then-Minister of Finance Zbyněk Stanjura did not review the warning until 25 March—three weeks after the contract with Jiřikovský had been signed—as the documents were intended as briefing materials for a scheduled meeting with Minister Blažek.[29]

The three-page legal warning was not delivered to Stanjura in a timely manner by his chief of staff, Filip Benda.[30] Benda declined to comment on why he waited 40 days to inform the Minister about the donation. His brother, Marek Benda, later characterized Filip Benda's involvement in the affair as a mistake.[31] Despite pressure from the parliamentary opposition and government MPs from the STAN party to dismiss him,[32] Stanjura retained Benda in his position.[33]

In March 2025, attorney Kárim Titz proposed an agreement to the Ministry of Justice whereby the Ministry would receive 30% of the contents of cryptocurrency wallet upon its joint opening. Titz subsequently confirmed that Jiřikovský’s objective was to utilize the donation as tax deduction.[34] Titz further asserted that "the court records did not indicate that the devices contained any proceeds of crime. On the contrary, as early as 2013, the client possessed 1,172 bitcoins with no connection to criminal activity, a fact supported by expert testimony."[34]

The negotiations for the bitcoin donation agreement were conducted by Radomír Daňhel, a former Deputy Minister of Justice. During the process, Daňhel repeatedly sought to clarify what the potential response of Financial Analytical Office (FAÚ) would be regarding the donated bitcoins should they be found to originate from criminal activity.[35] According to Titz, Jiřikovský’s specific motivations were never addressed during the negotiation of the donation to the Ministry.[34]

Titz stated that, within the draft agreement, he proposed that the Ministry of Finance, the Financial Analytical Office, the Office for Government Representation in Property Affairs, and the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office all be informed of the pending transaction.[34] However, the matter was not reported to the FAÚ until a week later, with Daňhel personally briefing FAÚ leadership only in late March. The Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office was officially notified of the transaction on 1 April, coinciding with the appointment of Lenka Bradáčová as head of the office by Minister Blažek.[34] In July 2025, Bradáčová provided a formal clarification regarding the timeline of when the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office was first apprised of the contract between the Ministry of Justice and Jiřikovský. Subsequent police findings concerning the prosecution's involvement in the case led to Bradáčová’s recusal from the legal supervision of the investigation to ensure impartiality.[36]

Bitcoin Issuance

Blažek initially stated that the crypto wallet was opened in the presence of a notary, who, according to the official record, arrived on March 7. However, an investigation by Radiožurnál revealed that hundreds of bitcoins—valued at approximately two billion CZK—had already been transferred to two separate accounts a day earlier. One of the accounts belongs to Jiřikovský, while the owner of the second remains unknown. Contrary to initial erroneous assumptions that the wallet contained 5366 bitcoins (roughly 12.5 billion CZK), which would have netted the Ministry up to 3.7 billion CZK under a one-third profit-sharing agreement,[37] these figures were not confirmed. The discrepancy arose because the initial estimate included bitcoins that had remained dormant since 2016. Consequently, the final figure used for the calculation was 1,562 bitcoins, of which the state received 468.468.

When notary Lubomír Mika[38] and Deputy Minister Daňhel arrived at the scene, forensic expert Jiří Berger informed them that he had already opened the wallet in the presence of Jiřikovský and his attorney (Kárim Titz). The wallet allegedly contained 1,562 bitcoins (approximately 3 billion CZK), a claim supported by screenshot; this balance is also verifiable on the blockchain. The value of the 30% donation was subsequently calculated based on this figure. According to Daňhel, it was "explained to them" that the technology was obsolete, requiring 30 hours to become operational. The expert and the donor reportedly began the process before the other invitees arrived so that the notary and ministry representatives would not have to "sit there for so long."[39] Investigations by Seznam Zprávy revealed that the expert was paid by Jiřikovský's attorney, Titz, based on an agreement with the Ministry of Justice, which had initially contacted the forensic expert on 20 February 2025.[39][40]

An additional witness—a representative of the Office for Government Representation in Property Affairs (ÚZSVM), which operates under the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic—was intended to be present during the handover. However, the Office declined to participate, citing a lack of competence for such activities.[41] Consequently, the Ministry received a donation of 468 bitcoins,[nb 1] which, as of May 2025, was valued at approximately one billion CZK. The bitcoins were transferred to a crypto wallet held by the UZSVM, as the Ministry of Justice did not possess one.[43] Although Decroix pledged to release the auditor's report, her handling of the matter raised concerns regarding transparency due to repeated failures to publish the audit text. This constituted a breach of a prior coalition condition established during a vote of no confidence in Fiala administration.[44]

Titz later maintained that the transaction agreement concerned only a single wallet containing 1,561 BTC. However, the Ministry received bitcoins linked to the Nucleus marketplace, which held over 5,300 BTC; of these, 3,855.15 BTC have remained untouched since 2016 and are unrelated to the transaction.[34]

Sale of Bitcoins

The Ministry sold the acquired bitcoins in an auction at the end of March. In May 2025, when questioned by journalists, Minister Blažek described the transaction as "ultra-legal"[17] or "ultra-clean."[45] The successful bidders who purchased the bitcoins from the ministry discovered their illegal origin only after attempting to use them at exchanges, where the funds were subsequently seized.[46]

Identification of Bitcoin origin

Jiřikovský personally attempted to liquidate Bitcoin worth 120 million CZK[47] at the Prague-based cryptocurrency exchange Bit.plus. Using the independent blockchain analysis tool Chainalysis, the exchange determined that the Bitcoin originated from a wallet associated with the illegal market Nucleus,[48] a platform known for the trade of weapons and narcotics.[49] The exchange conducted this verification in compliance with cryptocurrency regulations and anti-money laundering (AML) legislation.

During the process, Jiřikovský presented contract with the Ministry of Justice claiming ownership of two billion CZK in Bitcoin[50] (indicating that the Ministry had been aware since May 26 that the funds were of illicit origin).[47] Due to the suspicious nature of both the Bitcoin and the provided contract, the exchange reported the transaction to Financial Analytical Office (FAÚ), the Czech Republic’s financial intelligence unit, on March 28. The FAÚ subsequently filed a criminal complaint with the police on April 1 (though, according to reporting by Seznam Zprávy, police were already investigating the matter by that time).[50] Law enforcement subsequently ordered the "freezing" of the Bitcoin by instructing exchanges to prevent any further liquidation.[50]

This discovery established a direct link between Jiřikovský and the Nucleus marketplace. Prior to late May 2025, during the investigation into Jiřikovský's involvement in the Sheep Marketplace case (for which he had already served a sentence), authorities had not pursued potential connections between him and Nucleus.[49]

Resignation of Minister Blažek

Minister of Justice Pavel Blažek (left) resigned from the government following a scandal; he was succeeded by Eva Decroix (right).

Following intense media scrutiny, Minister Blažek opted to tender his resignation on 30 May 2025, citing a desire to avoid compromising the governing coalition's standing four months ahead of the parliamentary elections.[51] Blažek's deputy, Radomír Daňhel, also stepped down from his position. In response to the developments, Prime Minister Fiala announced that he would convene the National Security Council to address the situation.[52]

Bitcoin Seizure

The National Center Against Organized Crime (NCOZ) seized the initial 50 bitcoins on 4 April 2025; however, the Ministry of Justice was not formally notified until 26 May, when the seizure protocol was submitted by Jiřikovský’s counsel, Kárim Titz. According to a chronological overview published by Eva Decroix, a state of panic had already permeated the Ministry of Justice following 23 May. The case was subsequently made public on 28 May.[53]

Kirill Juran, the legal representative of two clients who received the aforementioned Bitcoin from the state, stated that his clients were not provided with information regarding origin of the cryptocurrency. He noted that the purchase agreement omitted details concerning the source addresses from which the Bitcoin was to be transferred. Furthermore, the clients did not receive the full amount from the state on June 11, 2025. Juran pointed out that the state refused to issue supplementary purchase agreement to facilitate the completion of the full transfer. He also criticized claims that no parties were harmed in the case, arguing that the individuals who purchased Bitcoin from the state suffered the most significant damages. Juran did not rule out litigation against the state for losses which he estimated at half a billion Czech koruna (based on a valuation of $200,000 USD per BTC).[54]

According to Juran, his clients had no prior knowledge of the specific Bitcoin addresses from which the coins would originate.[54] He suggested that if his clients were to sue the state for "defective performance" (in Czech "vadné plnění"), it would establish a new precedent in Czech jurisprudence.[55] In an interview with Echo24, Juran confirmed that as of June 16, 2025, the state was in default regarding the payment of 60 BTC.[55] Additionally, Juran described the publication of his clients' names and those of Jiřikovský’s family members in the Czech media as "completely beyond the pale".[55]

Decroix was informed by three legal opinions that the state should not handle the Bitcoins remaining at the Ministry of Justice from aborted auctions. The attorneys justified their stance by citing an increased risk that the coins originated from criminal activity.[56] Two law firms identified the marketplace Nucleus Market as the source of the Bitcoins. Buyers alleged potential defects in the cryptocurrency and demanded the delivery of Bitcoins that are legally untainted. In contrast to several statements by Decroix claiming zero damages, attorney Juran estimated his clients' claimed losses at tens of millions of korunas for 160 undelivered Bitcoins, which the customers had paid for but never received.[57] Juran stated that the statutory late interest on the withheld Bitcoin amount totals approximately 100,000 korunas per day.[58]

The legal representative for two buyers argued for the delivery of the Bitcoins on the grounds that no one had contested the validity of the purchase agreement. He emphasized that his clients required Bitcoins free of legal defects. Addressing whether the Ministry would have to purchase new "clean Bitcoins" to satisfy the claimants, Juran stated: "That is the Ministry's problem. If we enter into a contract for a thousand rolls, you do not need to care where I get them. But you want rolls that are neither stale nor moldy."[59] Journalist Petra Jaroměřská noted that if the illegal origin of the Bitcoins is proven, any form of financial settlement between the state and Juran's clients would represent a financial loss for the state.[59]

On August 15, 2025, law enforcement authorities seized the remaining unsold Bitcoin from the Ministry of Justice.[60] Juran likened the police seizure to "throwing a grenade" into the ongoing negotiations with prospective buyers. Juran's clients were not informed of the seizure by the police, but rather by the Ministry itself.[61][62] The third buyer to acquire Bitcoin from the state via auction was the cryptocurrency fund Sigil, managed by Pavel Stehno as of August 2025. Regarding the dealings with the state, Stehno remarked: "The negotiations are constructive; no one is seizing anything from us."[62]

Bitcoin confiscation

Seizure and disclosure

The National Headquarters Against Organized Crime (NCOZ) seized the first 50 bitcoins on 4 April 2025; however, the Ministry of Justice did not officially learn of this until May 26, when Jiřikovský's lawyer, Kárim Titz, sent the seizure protocol to the ministry. The Ministry of Justice reportedly experienced urgent internal communications regarding the bitcoin's legal status and origin verification. A chronological overview published by Eva Decroix describes a panic at the ministry. The case was made public on 28 May 2025.[63]

Sale of seized Bitcoins

Kirill Juran, legal representative of two clients who received the bitcoins from the state, said that the clients did not receive any information from the state regarding the origin of the cryptocurrency coins. The purchase agreement did not contain information about the addresses from which they originated. The clients did not receive the full amount from the state on 11 June 2025. Juran pointed out that the state did not want to issue another purchase agreement to complete the transfer of the entire amount. At the same time, he criticized the statement that no one had been harmed in the case, because in his opinion, the people who bought bitcoins from the state were the most harmed. He did not rule out legal proceedings against the state for the damage incurred, which he estimated at half a billion Czech koruna at a price of $200,000 USD to 1 BTC.[64]

According to Juran, his clients did not know beforehand which bitcoin addresses the coins would arrive from. If his clients sued the state for "defective performance", he believes it would create a new form of Czech case law. In an interview with Echo24, Juran confirmed that on June 16, 2025, the state was in default on a payment of 60 BTC. Juran described the publication of the names of his clients and Jiřikovský's family members in the Czech media as "completely outrageous."[65]

Concerns over origin and legality

Decroix noticed in three legal opinions that the state should not dispose of the bitcoins remaining with the Ministry of Justice from unfinished auctions. The lawyers justified their opinions by citing the increased risk that the coins originated from criminal activity. Two law firms identified the darknet marketplace Nucleus Market as the source of the bitcoins.[66] The buyers complained to the office about possible defects in the bitcoins and called on it to deliver bitcoins that are legally sound. Juran's clients had purchased 160 bitcoins from the state at auction but failed to receive delivery. Juran quantified their damages (including the purchase price paid but not fulfilled, plus statutory interest) at tens of millions of Czech Koruna, contrasting sharply with Decroix's earlier statements that no one had been harmed.[67][68] The legal representative of the two buyers argued for the delivery of bitcoins to his clients because no one had disputed the validity of the purchase agreement. He stated that his clients wanted bitcoins without defects. When asked whether the ministry would have to purchase new "clean bitcoins" to satisfy the persons represented, Juran replied, "That is the ministry's problem. When we conclude a contract for a thousand rolls, you don't need to care where I get them. But you want rolls that are neither hard nor moldy."[69]

Further confiscation and negotiations

Journalist Petra Jamořská pointed out that if the illegal origin of the bitcoins is proven, any form of financial settlement between the state and Juran's clients will result in financial losses for the state. Juran said that the dispute could be resolved by the end of August 2025. If the state fails to deliver the bitcoins, Juran did not rule out another lawsuit.[69]

The remaining undelivered bitcoins were confiscated by law enforcement on 15 August 2025. Juran compared the police seizure to “throwing a grenade” into buyer negotiations. His clients learned of the seizure from the ministry, not the police. Juran initially expected an agreement with the state within two weeks of Jiřikovský’s arrest but later changed his view, citing the seizure by NCOZ officers as the cause. The buyers’ lawyer said his clients could reach an agreement with the state by the end of September 2025, when it should be clear whether a deal is possible. The third buyer acquiring bitcoin from the state at auction was the Sigil cryptocurrency fund, managed by Pavel Stehno in August 2025. Stehno said of the negotiations with the state, "The negotiations are constructive, no one is confiscating anything from us."[70][71]

Effects on the blockchain

Editor Martin Drtina, from the website Lupa.cz, traced blockchain activity related to the scandal and identified a previously dormant wallet associated with the Nucleus marketplace, which became active in March 2025 and started making transactions during those two days. Furthermore, the editor clarified the identity of the expert from the donation agreement as Jiří Berger. On 7 March 2025, 0.468 BTC was transferred to a Trezor T hardware wallet owned by the Office for the Representation of the State in Property Matters. Later that same day, a total of 468 BTC was sent from the same address in four separate transactions. 22 minutes after the notary's record was completed, an additional 151 BTC was transferred from the same address to other addresses, where, apart from another trio of transfers, they remain to this day. According to Drtina, he clearly demonstrated that the individual who transferred the funds to the state controlled all wallets connected to the Nucleus marketplace.[72]

In the third chronological analysis, Drtina proved that after Jiřikovský's arrest and the house search on 12 April 2016, a third person (or group of persons) transferred funds from Nucleus wallets the following night.[73] In the fourth text, Drtina found that someone had been trying to exchange the bitcoin from this day's donation on Czech and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges, including the Kraken exchange. The unknown owners of the cryptocurrency wallets were trying to regroup the coins using mixers (tools on the Bitcoin blockchain that make it difficult to trace where the individual coins come from).[74]

Minister's resignation and political fallout

Justice Minister Pavel Blažek accepted the donation without thoroughly investigating its origins.[2] He later stated that he believed it to be an act of repentance by Jiříkovský and did not anticipate any legal complications. However, the lack of due diligence prompted public criticism and allegations of potential money laundering. Facing mounting pressure and seeking to avoid further damage to the government's reputation, Blažek resigned on May 31, 2025.[75][76]

The scandal intensified political tensions, with opposition parties calling for additional resignations, including those of Prime Minister Petr Fiala and Finance Minister Zbyněk Stanjura, alleging they were aware of the donation and its questionable origins.[77][15]

On 19 June 2025, the government survived a no-confidence vote triggered by the scandal.[78]

Ongoing investigations

The High Prosecutor's Office in Olomouc has initiated an investigation into the case, examining potential charges of abuse of official authority and money laundering. The police's organized crime unit is also involved in probing the circumstances surrounding the donation and its acceptance by the ministry.[75][77] Officials at the National Organized Crime Control Center have requested the cooperation of the FBI to jointly investigate Jiříkovský's connection to the dark web marketplace Nucleus Market. On 11 June 2025, an internal audit committee of the Financial Analysis Authority reviewed the FAA's handling of the case and concluded that the FAA's procedures had been followed correctly.

On 5 June 2025, Neovlivni.cz wrote that Jiříkovský had traveled to Asia, which he was able to do because he was not accused of anything at that time. Later, it was discovered that he was in Taiwan. Jiříkovský stated that he intended to return in the second half of June.[79]

Reactions

Domestic

Czech political analyst Lukáš Valeš described the Czech Republic as a "banana republic" to the foreign press.[80] Another political analyst, Jan Kubáček, commented on the case, saying, "The state administration is either incompetent or unethical." Kubáček disliked the government's unclear communication about the situation and non-professional conduct among government officials. During an interview with CNN Prima News, Kubáček criticized the slow manner in which the case was handled by Petr Fiala and said that the case could be characterized as one of the "demons of the 1990s".[81] Kubáček mentioned that STAN's departure from Fiala's government would either be expected by voters or necessary for the party to clarify its position against ministers from ODS. Political analyst Josef Mlejnek expressed that the case would weaken both the electoral coalition Spolu and Fiala himself.[82] "I never dreamed it was possible. That the Justice Ministry would take and legalize money from a convicted person without knowing the origin of that money," political scientist Vladimíra Dvořáková commented on the case.[83]

Government stability and leadership concerns

Political analyst Daniel Šárovec suggested that Blažek, Fiala, and Stanjura had underestimated the legal and reputational risks of accepting the donation without proper verification. Šárovec noted that the case has the potential to undermine the legitimacy of the government. He then pointed out that interior minister Vít Rakušan's statement about remaining in Fiala's cabinet is limited to "right here and right now." He speculated that the political leaders were prompted for their word because they wanted to buy time. Šárovec noted that Eva Decroix, who replaced Blažek as justice minister, was merely a "bridging minister."[81]

Media commentary and historical comparisons

Political commentator Thomas Kulidakis drew parallels to previous ODS scandals, including the controversial coupon privatization scheme and allegations against former advisor to the Prime Minister Nagyová.[84] Political commentator Kateřina Perknerová described the case as an event with an unusual number of coincidences. Journalist Petr Honzejk commented on Blažek's departure from his post as minister, saying that there was no society-wide catharsis that would restore trust in politics.[85] Publicist David Klimeš commented on the development of the case, saying that the public now had more comprehensive information. He also expressed the opinion that the story of the banana republic—the Czech Republic—is unfolding.[86]

Allegations of prior knowledge and internal communications

Commentator Miroslav Korecký highlighted communications between Decroix and Blažek regarding Deputy Dvořák's emails, suggesting prior knowledge of the donation. The email was supposed to prove that Dvořák should have known about the whole case from the beginning. Korecký used the phrase "the shredders will go there" for the supposed developments at the Ministry of Justice. He also expressed his conviction that neither TOP 09 nor KDU-ČSL could leave the cabinet because they were on the brink of dissolution. He described Fiala's TV appearance as the speech of a "communist puppet".[87]

Public opinion and electoral impact

Pavel Rychetský described the case as the cause of the upheaval in public opinion and the decline in popular support for the SPOLU coalition.[88] He denied that Jiřikovský's actions were entirely charitable. He also pointed out that, as of 28 June 2025, the state's consideration for the financial donation was still unknown. Political commentator Jindřich Šídlo warned that inadequate media explanation of cryptocurrency terminology and technical concepts hindered public understanding of the scandal's significance.[88]

Reactions of Czech politicians

Minister of Agriculture Marek Výborný (KDU-ČSL) said that Czechs are far more interested in affordable housing than in the bitcoin scandal. Interior Minister Vít Rakušan (STAN) said that he did not intend to overthrow the government of Petr Fiala at the start of June 2025. Subsequently, Rakušan described Eva Decroix's (ODS) statement that Deputy Minister Karel Dvořák (STAN) was implicated because Decroix knew about the donation in advance as an effort to cast suspicion on as many officials as possible. MEP Jan Farský (STAN) initially supported Rakušan's more conciliatory tone towards remaining in Fiala's cabinet. Later, Farský did not rule out a possible departure of STAN from Fiala's government. Farský also called for a 14-day ultimatum for ODS members to explain the case as a whole.[89] "The bitcoin case of Minister Blažek is a disgrace with the potential to jeopardize the Czech Republic's credit rating. It damages trust at home and abroad," said MEP Danuše Nerudová (STAN). According to participants, tensions between ODS and STAN coalition partners surfaced during a meeting on 10 June 2025, where Prime Minister Fiala reportedly left the room multiple times, apparently distressed by the scandal's political implications.[90]

Andrej Babiš, the chairman of the opposition ANO 2011 movement, commented on the case, saying that it was a criminal act that bore the hallmarks of money laundering by the state.[91] He described the case as the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the Czech Republic.[92] Babiš expressed the opinion that by dismissing Blažek, ODS representatives made Don Pablo of Brno (the media nickname of Blažek) a metaphorical scapegoat. Subsequently, Babiš gave a speech in France on Monday, 9 June 2025. Speaking in French at an event of the European faction Patriots for Europe, Babiš accused the Fiala cabinet of corruption in connection with the bitcoin scandal.[93] Alena Schillerová, chairwoman of the ANO 2011 parliamentary club, commented on the case by saying that the ministers shook hands with the mafia.[94]

Reaction of the Czech public

The bitcoin scandal did not affect the electoral preferences of the SPOLU coalition. According to the director of the STEM agency, Jaromír Mazák, this happened because people need more time to form their own opinions on more complex cases, or because the voters of SPOLU view Blažek's resignation as a sufficient response to the case.[95] According to another survey of voter preferences, the electoral core and potential remained stable after the outbreak of the case. Analysts compiling the IPSOS election survey up to 1 June 2025 stated that the predicted election result of the SPOLU coalition was within the statistical margin of error. Data scientists from Median found that for almost 30% of the original voters of the SPOLU coalition, the scandal has been the primary reason for the fall of the government of Petr Fiala.[96]

Representatives of the Czech non-profit organization Milion chvilek pro demokracii said in their statement on the Bitcoin case that they appreciated the efforts of the new Minister Decroix to conduct a transparent investigation into the case. They criticized the lack of concrete steps in dealing with the case.[97] Earlier, the "Momentarians" pointed out that the case is an opportunity to test the personal credibility of Fiala and called for "political accountability" for Finance Minister Stanjura.[98]

According to a survey by the STEM agency, two-thirds of Czechs considered the case to be serious in the second half of June 2025.[99] In response to the case, the SPOLU coalition began to lose electoral support. According to STEM analysts, the more serious cases can be expected to have a more gradual effect over time.[100]

Journalists from the Seznam Zprávy newsroom accessed an internal poll of electoral preferences commissioned by the SPOLU coalition. The poll shows that the coalition has lost the support of its disappointed supporters from the last election because of the case. Sociologist Jan Herzmann commented on the poll: "The case has definitely given SPOLU a leg up in its quest for electoral victory."[101] A third of the coalition's original voters agreed on the need for other ministers to resign and approximately one in four of the coalition's original voters wanted Fiala's cabinet to fall.[96]

International

Editors of Politico predicted that the case may help Andrej Babiš win the upcoming parliamentary elections. Petr Kaniok, a university teacher from Masaryk University, told the server that government politicians managed to cover up the case because Blažek resigned as minister.[102] The journalist Jan Lopatka noted for Reuters that Fiala's government should not face a vote of no confidence because it held a majority of 104 MPs.[103] The AP journalists said that the then-government opposition accused the government of money laundering.[75] The journalist Jean-Baptiste Chastand of the French daily Le Monde noted the shift in government officials' communication from "giving money away for free" to Blažek's removal from office.[13] The motive of fear of the Czech Republic's failure as a money-laundering state was elaborated on by Aneta Zachová for the European news website Euractiv, who shared President Petr Pavel's concerns about the weakening trust in the rule of law.[104]

The journalist Anton Filippov from the Ukrainian newspaper European Pravda stated that the case could jeopardize Czech assistance in the war in Ukraine. He further speculated about the weakening of Fiala within ODS and the possibility of him being replaced by Martin Kuba, which would lead to unpredictable changes in the relationship between Ukraine and the Czech Republic.[105] The editor Albin Sybera of the German agency Bne IntelliNews noted Zbyněk Stanjura's reluctance to resign from the position of Minister of Finance after the scandal, even though Blažek had informed him about the donation in advance.[106] Sybera also quoted the Czech economist Richard Hindls, referencing his interview with Czech Radio. Hindls stated that this type of transaction involving cryptocurrencies, including their sale at a state auction, would not be possible in the private sector due to state regulation.[107]

Impact on individual stakeholders

The case had a direct or indirect impact on its individual stakeholders over time.

Zdislava Pokorná

Prior to the publication of her first report, Pokorná received several phone calls from unknown numbers, which she believed were linked to Blažek and the "Brno cells" of the Civic Democratic Party (ODS).[108] Following the publication, Pokorná faced public attacks and ridicule for her role in uncovering the case. The discourse subsequently shifted from the factual aspects of the case to the author's personal life and her motivations for publishing the reports.[109] Regarding the development of the case, she stated her belief that the events were pre-planned.[110]

Kárim Titz

Acting as Jiřikovský's legal counsel, Titz was the first to approach Ministry of Justice officials with the offer of a donation. The attorney was present during the opening of the Bitcoin wallet on 7 March 2025. Prior to the Bitcoin case, Titz had visited Minister Pavel Blažek at the Ministry on several occasions.[111] Following the access of the wallet, Titz acquired land in Lelekovice valued at over CZK 11.6 million.[112] Subsequent to the acceptance of the donation, European Justice Organization initiated an investigation into Titz on suspicion of fraud, money laundering, failure to prevent a crime, and other related offences.[113]

In June 2025, the Czech Bar Association began examining whether Titz had violated anti-money laundering (AML) legislation during the facilitation of the donation. In March 2026, the Association filed a disciplinary complaint against him for failing to rigorously verify the origin of the cryptocurrency and for neglecting to report the transfer as a suspicious transaction.[113] In response to the complaint, Titz began transferring ownership of his real estate holdings to his wife. The filings with the Cadastre of the Czech Republic occurred one day after the charges against Jiřikovský were expanded.[114]

Notes

  1. ^ More precisely 468.468, according to the deed of gift (stipulated as 30% of 1,561.560).[42]

See also

References

  1. ^ Veselovský, Martin (5 June 2025). Pokorná: Bitcoinová kauza smrděla od začátku, spousta věcí nedává smysl. Fiala se do toho zamotává. DVTV (in Czech). Online Partners. Retrieved 7 March 2026 – via YouTube.
  2. ^ a b c "Czech government faces no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". Reuters. 12 June 2025. Retrieved 12 August 2025.
  3. ^ "Czech police probe convict's €40 mln gift to justice ministry". TVP World. Retrieved 4 October 2025.
  4. ^ "Denik N: Finance minister warned justice minister against accepting dodgy bitcoins". Radio Prague. 2 June 2025. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  5. ^ a b "Czech government survives no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". POLITICO. 18 June 2025. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  6. ^ Weissová, Soňa (5 June 2025). "Česká novinárka Pokorná vysvetľuje kauzu bitcoinov: Nerozumiem, ako si mohli myslieť, že je to legálne". Denník N (in Slovak). N Media. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  7. ^ "Denik N: Finance minister warned justice minister against accepting dodgy bitcoins". Radio Prague. 2 June 2025. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  8. ^ "České ministerstvo spravodlivosti zadávalo pokyny na prevod darovaných bitcoinov ich dražiteľom aj po tom, čo vtedajší minister Pavel Blažek vedel o podozreniach". Denník N (in Slovak). 1 September 2025. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
  9. ^ "Czech Justice Minister Resigns Over Bitcoin Scandal". Coinpaper. 2 June 2025. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
  10. ^ "Fiala's Cabinet Survives 4th No-Confidence Vote, Called Over Bitcoin Scandal". Brno Daily. Czech News Agency. 6 March 2026. Retrieved 6 March 2026.
  11. ^ Pohanka, Vít (2 June 2025). "Bitcoin scandal shakes Czech government as opposition pushes for no-confidence vote". Czech Radio. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  12. ^ "Czech Justice Minister Pavel Blažek has resigned over a 468 Bitcoin donation linked to convicted drug trafficker". Expats.cz. 31 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  13. ^ a b Chastand, Jean-Baptiste (31 May 2025). "Czech justice minister resigns after accepting €40 million in bitcoin from convicted criminal". Le Monde. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  14. ^ "Czech police probe convict's €40 mln gift to justice ministry". Telewizja Polska. 30 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  15. ^ a b Lazarová, Daniela (3 June 2025). "Czech PM calling National Security Council meeting over suspect bitcoin transaction". Czech Radio. Retrieved 4 June 2025.
  16. ^ "Czech government survives no-confidence motion over bitcoin scandal". 18 June 2025.
  17. ^ a b Pokorná, Zdislava (28 May 2025). "Blažkovo ministerstvo si vzalo miliardu v bitcoinech od obchodníka s drogami. Řeší to policie" [Blažek's ministry took a billion in bitcoins from a drug dealer. The police are investigating]. Deník N (in Czech). N Media. ISSN 2571-1717.
  18. ^ "Middle District of Florida | More Than $1.7 Million In Forfeited Funds Presented To Law Enforcement Agencies". United States Department of Justice. 17 January 2018. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  19. ^ "Miliardář z tržiště. Příběh zámečníka, který daroval miliardu v bitcoinech". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). 30 May 2025. Retrieved 8 December 2025.
  20. ^ "Jiřikovský z bitcoinové kauzy je stále v podmínce, skončí mu v listopadu 2026". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Czech News Agency. 19 June 2025. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  21. ^ Štický, Jiří; Pšenička, Jiří (30 May 2025). "Miliardář z tržiště. Příběh zámečníka, který daroval miliardu v bitcoinech". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Seznam Zprávy.
  22. ^ Blažek, Vojtěch (9 June 2025). "Jiřikovský vyzrál na soudy. Zapomněl heslo k miliardám, pak si vzpomněl". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  23. ^ Gavriněv, Vojtěch (3 June 2025). "Bitcoinová kauza: soud nechal smazat jen tři počítače. Osm zašifrovaných zařízení vrátil neporušených". iROZHLAS (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  24. ^ "Nejvyšší soud odráží kritiku. Verdikt v kauze Jiřikovského odpovídá zákonu, uvedl". iDNES.cz. MAFRA. 10 June 2025. Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  25. ^ Vávra, Jiří (30 June 2025). "Jiřikovský získal přístup i k alternativám bitcoinu". e15.cz (in Czech). CZECH NEWS CENTER. Retrieved 7 July 2025.
  26. ^ Valášek, Lukáš (14 June 2025). "První dopis Jiřikovského: Nabízel bitcoiny, o třetině nemluvil" [Jiřikovský's first letter: He offered bitcoins, remained silent about a third]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 14 June 2025.
  27. ^ Janouš, Václav (10 June 2025). "STAN o bitcoinech věděl. Náměstek Dvořák obdržel v prosinci spěchavou zprávu". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  28. ^ Šopfová, Kristýna; Kovářová, Radka (25 June 2025). "Pozor, až to bude chtít zpátky. Ministerstvo vědělo o varování soudu z bitcoinové kauzy". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Borgis. Retrieved 25 June 2025.
  29. ^ Blažek, Vojtěch (24 June 2025). "„Morální hazard". Právníci z financí včas varovali před bitcoinovým darem". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 24 June 2025.
  30. ^ Blažek, Vojtěch; Ciroková, Kristina (25 June 2025). "Ostře psaný dokument mohl zastavit kauzu s bitcoiny. Proč ho Stanjura nedostal?". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  31. ^ Kačmář, Tomáš (22 July 2025). "Benda: Bratr také udělal chybu. Babiš nás ale kritizuje, protože nenávidí polistopadový vývoj". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  32. ^ Grim, Jakub (19 June 2025). "Obětujte Bendu, zaznělo z koalice. Stanjura ale šéfa svého kabinetu zatím podržel". iROZHLAS (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  33. ^ Machová, Martina (25 June 2025). "Filip Benda dál vede Stanjurův úřad, i když opomenuté varování bylo závažné". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Borgis. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  34. ^ a b c d e f Kozelka, Petr (14 June 2025). "Advokát z bitcoinové kauzy promluvil: Žádné pokání. Miliardový dar si chtěl klient odečíst z daní". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Borgis. Retrieved 14 June 2025.
  35. ^ Janouš, Václav (17 June 2025). "Potkal se Blažek s dárcem bitcoinů? A jaká byla role náměstka Daňhela? ptá se policie". iDNES.cz. Mafra. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
  36. ^ Svoboda, Tomáš; Blažek, Vojtěch; Nohl, Radek (16 March 2026). "Není nestranná, řekl vrchní žalobce. Vyloučil kolegyni z bitcoinové kauzy" [She is not impartial, said the Chief Prosecutor. He recused his colleague from the Bitcoin case]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 17 March 2026.
  37. ^ Gavriněv, Vojtěch (30 May 2025). "Kauza bitcoiny: v peněžence nebyly 3 miliardy, ale 12. Informace ministerstva o výši prostředků mají trhliny". iROZHLAS. Czech Radio.
  38. ^ Müller, Matyáš (4 June 2025). "Notář u převodu bitcoinů stál ministerstvo o 50 tisíc víc, než bylo nutné". iDNES.cz. MAFRA. Retrieved 6 June 2025.
  39. ^ a b Ciriková, Kristina; Pšenička, Jiří (6 June 2025). "Znalce, který nenašel bitcoiny za devět miliard, zaplatil Blažkův dárce". Seznam Zprávy. Retrieved 6 June 2025.
  40. ^ Dimun, Petr (6 June 2025). "Bitcoingate: Zásadní otazníky nad rolí znalců a objektivností vyšetřování". Info.cz. CMI News. Retrieved 6 June 2025.
  41. ^ Blažek, Vojtěch (11 June 2025). "U převodu „Blažkových" bitcoinů měl být další svědek. Jeho šéfka to zakázala". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  42. ^ Deed of Gift No. MSP-31/2025-MSP-CES (PDF)
  43. ^ "Za přijetí bitcoinového daru nese odpovědnost Blažkův náměstek, uvedl audit - Seznam Zprávy". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). 31 August 2025. Retrieved 1 September 2025.
  44. ^ "Žalobci žádají, aby zpráva z auditu k bitcoinové kauze teď plně zveřejněna nebyla". České noviny (in Czech). Czech News Agency. 3 September 2025. Retrieved 3 September 2025.
  45. ^ Horák, Jan (30 May 2025). "Blažek zpravil Bradáčovou o miliardovém daru až týdny poté, co resort bitcoiny od dealera drog přijal" [Blažek informed Bradáčová about the billion-dollar gift only weeks after the ministry accepted the bitcoins from the drug dealer]. iROZHLAS (in Czech). Czech Radio.
  46. ^ Juran, Kirill (15 June 2025). Kdo byli kupující v kauze Bitcoingate? [Who were the buyers in the Bitcoingate case?]. Kirill Juran (in Czech). Retrieved 11 November 2025 – via YouTube.
  47. ^ a b Blažek, Vojtěch; Jelínková, Adéla (24 June 2025). "Schůzka, o níž Blažek dosud mlčel: Bitcoiny chtěl řešit se špičkami žalobců" [The meeting Blažek kept silent about: He wanted to discuss Bitcoin with top prosecutors]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 24 June 2025.
  48. ^ Danajský dar — Nerozpletené hnízdo [A Danaean Gift — An Unravelled Nest]. Reportéři ČT (in Czech). Czech Television. 2 June 2025. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  49. ^ a b Valášek, Lukáš; Blažek, Vojtěch; Jelínková, Adéla (29 May 2025). "Miliarda, kterou převzal Blažek, přitekla přímo z účtů drogového tržiště" [The billion Blažek took over flowed directly from drug market accounts]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  50. ^ a b c Blažek, Vojtěch (12 June 2025). "Smlouvu s Blažkem přinesl Jiřikovský i do směnárny. Doufal, že mu pomůže" [Jiřikovský brought the contract with Blažek to the exchange, hoping it would help him]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  51. ^ "Blažek rezignuje na post ministra. Nečekal jsem to, řekl Skopeček". Seznam Zprávy. 30 May 2025. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  52. ^ Podlešák, Václav; Gričová, Andrea (3 June 2025). "Fiala svolá Bezpečnostní radu státu kvůli bitcoinové kauze". ČT24 (in Czech). Czech Television. Czech News Agency. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  53. ^ Kropáček, Jiří (18 June 2025). "Nové milníky časové osy: Moment, kdy zavládla na Blažkově úřadu panika". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  54. ^ a b Zásadní moment pro bitcoin v Česku: Kirill Juran komentuje státní prodeje [A pivotal moment for Bitcoin in the Czech Republic: Kirill Juran comments on state sales] (Video). Události a komentáře (in Czech). Czech Television. 12 June 2025. Retrieved 11 November 2025 – via YouTube.
  55. ^ a b c Štrunc, Pavel (16 June 2025). Poslali státu stovky tisíc, nedostali plnění. Co mají dělat ti, co koupili bitcoiny z kauzy Blažek? [They sent hundreds of thousands to the state, received nothing. What should those who bought bitcoins from the Blažek case do?]. Echo24 (Video) (in Czech). Echo Media. Retrieved 13 November 2025 – via YouTube.
  56. ^ "Bitcoiny nevyužívejte, radí advokáti ministerstvu Evy Decroix. Je vysoké riziko, že jsou z trestné činnosti". iROZHLAS (in Czech). Czech Radio. 11 July 2025. Retrieved 13 July 2025.
  57. ^ Novák, Daniel (13 June 2025). "Ministerstvo nám dluží bitcoiny. Ať je pošle, říkají kupci z „Blažkovy aukce"". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 25 July 2025.
  58. ^ Vávra, Jan (25 July 2025). "Další past v bitcoinové kauze? Růst kryptoměny zadělává na problém". E15 (in Czech). Czech News Center. Retrieved 25 July 2025.
  59. ^ a b Jaroměřská, Petra (13 August 2025). "Stát musí sehnat jiné bitcoiny, než má od Jiřikovského. Jinak mu hrozí žaloba". Aktuálně.cz (in Czech). Economia. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  60. ^ Jelínková, Kristýna; Gričová, Andrea (15 August 2025). "Policie zajistila resortu spravedlnosti bitcoiny od Jiřikovského" [Police seize Jiřikovský's Bitcoins from the Ministry of Justice]. ČT24 (in Czech). Czech Television. Czech News Agency. Retrieved 17 August 2025.
  61. ^ Malinovská, Klára; Vavanová, Ana (15 August 2025). "‚Granát do jednání s ministerstvem.' Kupce bitcoinů překvapil krok policie, chystají dohodu o předání" ['A grenade into the negotiations.' Bitcoin buyers surprised by police action, preparing handover agreement]. iROZHLAS (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 17 August 2025.
  62. ^ a b Nohl, Radek; Novák, Daniel (21 August 2025). "Bitcoinová kauza: Po policejním zásahu se dohoda s investory komplikuje" [Bitcoin case: Negotiations with investors complicated following police intervention]. Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 21 August 2025.
  63. ^ Kropáček, Jiří (18 June 2025). "Nový milník časové osy: Vymlčené varování, které mohlo zastavit Blažka". Seznam Zprávy. Seznam. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  64. ^ "12. června". Události, komentáře. Czech Television. 12 June 2025. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  65. ^ "Poslali státu stovky tisíc, nedostali plnění. Co mají dělat ti, co koupili bitcoiny z kauzy Blažek?". Echo Podcasty. Echo Media. 16 June 2025. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  66. ^ "Bitcoiny nevyužívejte, radí advokáti ministerstvu Evy Decroix. Je vysoké riziko, že jsou z trestné činnosti". iROZHLAS. Czech Radio. Czech News Agency. 11 July 2025. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  67. ^ Novák, Daniel (13 June 2025). "Ministerstvo nám dluží bitcoiny. Ať je pošle, říkají kupci z "Blažkovy aukce"". Seznam Zprávy. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  68. ^ Vávra, Jan (25 July 205). "Další past v bitcoinové kauze? Růst ceny kryptoměny zadělává na problém". E15. Czech News Center. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  69. ^ a b Jaroměřská, Petra (13 August 2025). "Stát musí sehnat jiné bitcoiny, než má od Jiřikovského. Jinak mu hrozí žaloba". Aktuálně.cz. Economia. Retrieved 6 September 2025.
  70. ^ "Trust Format for Bitcoin Wealth Planning" (PDF). Dearkkamperland. 30 October 2025. Retrieved 30 October 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  71. ^ Nohl, Radek; Novák, Daniel (21 August 2025). "Bitcoinová kauza: Po policejním zásahu se dohoda s investory komplikuje". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 25 January 2026.
  72. ^ Drtina, Martin (2 June 2025). "Spící peněženka z bitcoinové kauzy obživla jen na dva dny. Miliardy z ní mizely před darem i po něm". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
  73. ^ Drtina, Martin (9 June 2025). "Záhada Bitcoinů v pohybu: z peněženek Nuclea odcházely i v noci po dealerově zatčení". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  74. ^ Drtina, Martin (19 June 2025). "Bitcoiny může stát stopnout jen při pokusech o jejich oficiální směnu". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  75. ^ a b c "Czech justice minister resigns over a donated bitcoin scandal". apnews.com. Associated Press. 30 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  76. ^ Zachová, Aneta (2 June 2025). "Czech Justice Minister Pavel Blažek resigns amid bitcoin scandal". Euractiv.com. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  77. ^ a b "Czech Justice Minister resigns over bitcoin scandal amid political fallout". Expats.cz. 31 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
  78. ^ "Czech coalition government survives no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". AP News. Associated Press. 19 June 2025.
  79. ^ Slonková, Sabina (5 June 2025). "Hlavní aktér bitcoinové aféry zmizel. Je v Asii". Neovlivni.cz (in Czech). Dead Line Media. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
  80. ^ Šilhán, Petr (2 June 2025). "Valeš k bitcoinové kauze: Česko je jako banánová republika. STAN je rád za odvedení pozornosti". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  81. ^ a b Pozor na "démony z devadesátek", varuje Kubáček Spolu. Mohou Starostové držet trumfy?. CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. 9 June 2025. Retrieved 30 July 2025 – via YouTube.
  82. ^ Frouzová, Kateřina (30 May 2025). "Bitcoinová aféra oslabí Spolu i Fialu, říká politolog. Premiérovi přinese hned dva problémy". Deník N (in Czech). N Media. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  83. ^ Senková, Zita (2 June 2025). "Politoložka Dvořáková: Blažkovo přijetí bitcoinů je absurdní. Skandál může být obrovských rozměrů". Czech Radio (in Czech). Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  84. ^ Dyntr, Josef (4 June 2025). "Bitcoiny vládním "strejdům z Brna" nic neříkají, myslí si komentátoři". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  85. ^ Honzejk, Petr (31 May 2025). "Petr Honzejk: Bitcoinová kauza Pavla Blažka ničí volební šance Spolu". Český rozhlas plus (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  86. ^ Hartmann, Petr (23 June 2025). "Petr Hartman: Bitcoinová kauza zatím neposlala Spolu ke dnu". Český rozhlas Plus (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  87. ^ Korecký: Kalousek si musí rvát vlasy. Kdyby založil stranu, voliče by teď rýžoval ve velkém. CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. 22 June 2025. Retrieved 30 July 2025 – via YouTube.
  88. ^ a b "Bitcoinová kauza? "Dar musel být spojen s požadavkem protislužby"". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). 29 June 2025. Retrieved 30 July 2025.
  89. ^ Mašková, Martina; Kadeřábková, Johana (10 June 2025). "Chceme do 14 dnů vědět, jak se kauza s bitcoiny odehrála. ODS to musí vysvětlit všem, volá Farský". Czech Radio (in Czech). Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  90. ^ Stuchlíková, Lucie; Dolejší, Václav (11 June 2025). "Rozčílený Fiala se uklidňoval za dveřmi. Jak probíhalo jednání mezi STAN a ODS". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  91. ^ Müller, Matyáš (11 June 2025). "Česká vláda spolupracovala s mafií, křičela ve Sněmovně Schillerová". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  92. ^ Vašek, Petr; Jelínková, Kristýna; Gričová, Andrea; Kořénková, Tereza (11 June 2025). "Sněmovní debatu opět ovládla bitcoinová kauza. Poslanci nic neprojednali". ČT24 (in Czech). Czech News Agency. Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  93. ^ Machová, Dominika (12 June 2025). "Ubohost, dělá ostudu v celé EU. Pospíšila nadzvedla Babišova slova na sjezdu Patriotů pro Evropu". Forum24 (in Czech). Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  94. ^ Cigánek, Lukáš (11 June 2025). "Hrozné, smutné a tragické, rozvášnila se Schillerová. Politici si podle ní podali ruku s mafií". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  95. ^ "Nový volební model: Bitcoinová kauza koalici Spolu zatím nepoškodila". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Czech News Agency. 8 June 2025. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  96. ^ a b Kučerová, Barbora (5 June 2025). "Průzkum: Třetina voličů Spolu po bitcoinové aféře nevěří vládě". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  97. ^ "Stanovisko Milionu chvilek ke kauze Pavla Blažka a tzv. bitcoinové aféře". Milion chvilek pro demokracii (in Czech). 11 June 2025. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  98. ^ Kolář, Petr (3 June 2025). "Milion chvilek kritizuje Fialu. Tohle je vaše zkouška důvěryhodnosti, apeluje". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  99. ^ Ferenčík, Jakub (20 June 2025). "Two-thirds of Czechs take bitcoin scandal seriously". Radio Prague. Retrieved 25 January 2026.
  100. ^ Veselý, Martin (22 July 2025). "EXKLUZIVNÍ výzkum: Bitcoinová kauza vysává Spolu. Piráti posílili, nad Motoristy visí otazník". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved 6 March 2026.
  101. ^ Stuchlíková, Lucie (24 June 2025). "Bitcoinová kauza odrazuje Spolu ty voliče, které potřebuje získat nejvíc". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 28 June 2025.
  102. ^ Jochecová, Ketrin (2 June 2025). "Drug dealer bitcoin scandal risks upending Czech election". politico.eu. Retrieved 8 June 2025.
  103. ^ Lopatka, Jan (3 June 2025). "Czech government set to face no-confidence vote in bitcoin scandal". Reuters. Retrieved 8 June 2025.
  104. ^ Zachová, Aneta (4 June 2025). "Czech bitcoin scandal sparks fears of state role in money laundering". Euractiv.com. Retrieved 8 June 2025.
  105. ^ Filippov, Anton (6 June 2025). "Could the bitcoin scandal bring down Czechia's pro-Ukraine government?". European Pravda. Retrieved 8 June 2025.
  106. ^ Sybera, Albin (6 June 2025). "Czech finance minister rejects calls for his resignation amid bitcoin scandal embarrassment". bne IntelliNews. Retrieved 8 June 2025.
  107. ^ Senková, Zita; Odložilová, Pavlína (5 June 2025). "Ekonom Richard Hindls: Zatloukat a vymlčet? Bankám by se aféra s bitcoiny nikdy nestala" (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  108. ^ Titlbach, Filip (29 May 2025). „Ultralegální“ miliarda v bitcoinech od drogového mecenáše. Jak náhle zbohatlo Blažkovo ministerstvo. Studio N (in Czech). N Media. Retrieved 20 January 2026 – via YouTube.
  109. ^ Šafaříková, Kateřina (10 July 2025). "Komentář: „Usekat ti prsty je málo." Otevřený dopis mužským členům vlády". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 20 January 2026.
  110. ^ Novinářka o kauze bitcoin: Tahle akce se plánovala. Mám pocit, že všichni ztrácejí paměť. CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. 13 June 2025. Retrieved 20 January 2026 – via YouTube.
  111. ^ Ryšavá, Michaela; Pokorný, Marek (10 June 2025). "Na ministerstvu jako stálý host, v ODS jako „firemní" právník. Kdo je advokát bitcoinového miliardáře Kárim Titz". Hospodářské noviny (in Czech). Economia. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  112. ^ Slonková, Sabina (9 June 2025). "Stát převzal bitcoiny, advokát začal s nákupy nemovitostí". neovlivni.cz (in Czech). Dead Line Media. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  113. ^ a b Tykalová, Tereza; Vaníčková, Kateřina (9 June 2025). "Advokát Titz po otevření bitcoinové peněženky koupil pozemek za miliony". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved 14 March 2026.
  114. ^ Mikel, Jakub (13 March 2026). "Advokát z bitcoinové kauzy převádí na manželku nemovitosti". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved 14 March 2026.
Wikiversity has learning resources about Summer Books of Petr Fiala 2025
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.