2012 California Proposition 31

Proposition 31
November 6, 2012 (2012-11-06)
Two-Year State Budget Cycle Initiative
Results
Choice
Votes %
Yes 4,642,088 39.48%
No 7,115,166 60.52%
Valid votes 11,757,254 100.00%
Invalid or blank votes 0 0.00%
Total votes 11,757,254 100.00%

No
  60-70%
  50-60%
[1]

The 2012 California Proposition 31 was officially titled "State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute." It was a California ballot measure in the November 2012 California elections. The initiative would have established a two-year state budget, allowed the governor to make budget cuts in fiscal emergencies, prevented the state state legislature from spending more than $25 million without creating spending cuts or other budget offsets, and allowed local governments the ability to transfer certain amounts of property taxes among themselves instead of the state.[2][3] Although the law was supported by the California Republican Party, multiple conservative groups came out against proposition 31, including members of the Tea Party movement who viewed the law as a way to undermine property rights.[4][5][6]

Analysis

If Proposition 31 had passed, it was estimated that the state government would have suffered a loss of $200 million, as these funds would have been transferred to local governments.[7]

Editorial endorsements

Newspaper Position
Bay Area Reporter[8] Oppose
Fresno Bee[9] Support
Los Angeles Daily News[10] Support
Los Angeles Times[11] Oppose
Modesto Bee[12] Support
Orange County Register[13] Oppose
Sacramento Bee[14] Oppose
San Diego Union-Tribune[15] Support
San Francisco Bay Guardian[16] Oppose
San Francisco Chronicle[17] Support
San Jose Mercury News[18] Support
Ventura County Star[19] Oppose

References

  1. ^ "Statement of Vote" (PDF). California Secretary of State. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  2. ^ "TEXT OF PROPOSED LAWS: Proposition 31" (PDF). California Secretary of State.
  3. ^ "Proposition 31 Title and Summary | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State". vigarchive.sos.ca.gov. Retrieved 2022-05-18.
  4. ^ Schmitt, Kevin (2014). "Turf Wars: Territoriality and the Allocation of Sales and Use Taxes in California". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2390418. ISSN 1556-5068.
  5. ^ Greene, Robert (2012-09-14). "Is Proposition 31 really a U.N. conspiracy?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
  6. ^ "California's Prop. 31: The Revolution Will Not Be Publicized". National Review. 2012-09-10. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
  7. ^ "Proposition 31 Analysis | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State". vigarchive.sos.ca.gov. Retrieved 2022-05-18.
  8. ^ Bay Area Reporter
  9. ^ Fresno Bee
  10. ^ Los Angeles Daily News
  11. ^ Los Angeles Times
  12. ^ Modesto Bee
  13. ^ Orange County Register
  14. ^ Sacramento Bee
  15. ^ San Diego Union-Tribune
  16. ^ San Francisco Bay Guardian
  17. ^ San Francisco Chronicle
  18. ^ San Jose Mercury News
  19. ^ Ventura County Star